Anyone using a rollerbridge on a Classic Player Jaguar?

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Anyone using a rollerbridge on a Classic Player Jaguar?

Post by gypsyseven »

I was thinking about getting one, maybe....

What are the pros and cons on a rollerbridge on a Classic Player Jaguar?
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

Good luck trying to find it in 9.5" radius.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
Cvillethug
.
.
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:34 am
Location: Ohio

Post by Cvillethug »

To me the roller didn't feel quite as stable and definitely pops strings off the saddles more than the regular TOM. I did like how it sounded a little better, not quite as percussive and the attack seemed softer or something. It didn't seem to do anything as far as trem operation goes.

They're really cheap on guitar fetish so I say you might as well try it out.
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

honeyiscool wrote:Good luck trying to find it in 9.5" radius.
Why not?! http://www.guitarfetish.com/Roller-Brid ... p_661.html#
User avatar
avj
A Select Individual
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:54 am
Location: Detroitish.

Post by avj »

I am, and it's rad. The radius disparity between 9.5" and what is likely close to 12" on the one linked below is negligible and certainly not as noticeable as, say, using that bridge on a vintage-spec 7.25" radius. I use that exact one and it's a simple drop-in; no bubbles, no troubles. I threw one on both my CP Jag and CP JM and haven't looked back. I found no issue with string pops with 11s on the Jag and 10s on the JM, and I play the absolute piss out of both. I found trem action to be improved, as the AOM bridge doesn't really rock in the thimbles like a traditional Jag/JM bridge does because the posts screw in. This means you're just pulling the strings back and forth in the grooves on the stock bridge, which of course can lead to tuning issues if they're not lubed up properly.

Roller Bridge Chrome plated fits Les Paul @ GFS

Also, as a new CP Jaguar owner, let me point you to this gem of wisdom curated by dearest Dave, me, and several others:

Fender Jaguar Classic Player: Quest for the Amber Switch Tip
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

avj wrote:I am, and it's rad. The radius disparity between 9.5" and what is likely close to 12" on the one linked below is negligible and certainly not as noticeable as, say, using that bridge on a vintage-spec 7.25" radius. I use that exact one and it's a simple drop-in; no bubbles, no troubles. I threw one on both my CP Jag and CP JM and haven't looked back. I found no issue with string pops with 11s on the Jag and 10s on the JM, and I play the absolute piss out of both. I found trem action to be improved, as the AOM bridge doesn't really rock in the thimbles like a traditional Jag/JM bridge does because the posts screw in. This means you're just pulling the strings back and forth in the grooves on the stock bridge, which of course can lead to tuning issues if they're not lubed up properly.

Roller Bridge Chrome plated fits Les Paul @ GFS

Also, as a new CP Jaguar owner, let me point you to this gem of wisdom curated by dearest Dave, me, and several others:

Fender Jaguar Classic Player: Quest for the Amber Switch Tip

Thanks mate!
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

I use one on my Japanese Jaguar, the chunky Wilkinson one rather than the TOM-style one. It works fine, the strings don't pop out at all, it's a good bridge. The radius difference makes absolutely fuck-all difference though I have my Jag set up with a fairly medium string height so the different really isn't noticeable. I guess if you want the strings so low that you can do Yngwie tapping solos then it might make a difference, but then you're a cunt so fuck you.
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

ekwatts wrote:...but then you're a cunt so fuck you.
Thanks a lot, especially to be so honest with me...

I always prefer/ set my guitars with medium action.I´m strumming very hard and don´t wanna hear any buzz when playing my guitars unplugged...
MMPicker
.
.
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:55 am

Re: Anyone using a rollerbridge on a Classic Player Jaguar?

Post by MMPicker »

gypsyseven wrote:I was thinking about getting one, maybe....
Why? Are you having some issue with your AOM? Mine works fine, no problems.

BTW I put a strat trem spring under the screw-in trem arm, now my trem stays where I want it, and works just fine. As does the bridge in all other respects. YMMV.
User avatar
avj
A Select Individual
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:54 am
Location: Detroitish.

Re: Anyone using a rollerbridge on a Classic Player Jaguar?

Post by avj »

MMPicker wrote:
gypsyseven wrote:I was thinking about getting one, maybe....
Why? Are you having some issue with your AOM? Mine works fine, no problems.

BTW I put a strat trem spring under the screw-in trem arm, now my trem stays where I want it, and works just fine. As does the bridge in all other respects. YMMV.
Great idea! I usually like mine flopping around all limpy (as noted in the Quest thread above), but I'm going to give that a try and see how it feels.
User avatar
Joey
.
.
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Joey »

My Fender Flame came stock with the Schaller Roller Bridge. I enjoy it, don't have a tremolo on the guitar though. The Flame & Esprit dissolved and became the Robben Ford model. Ford said the rollers lacked tone and swapped em out for TOM's.
User avatar
Loco3
.
.
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:47 am
Location: The rolling hills of Nimbin

Post by Loco3 »

Oh yeah!
Just put a Mosrite roller bridge on my CP Jag, fat chunky rollers, bridge solid as, really nice, radius is supposedly 9" but it seems to match the 9 1/2" fingerboard exactly.
Same post spacing as standard but only 2" string spacing though, which luckily I like.
Needed to shim the neck, but well worth it. Great tone, great sustain, trem feels great, stays in tune.
I tried reaming out the CP thimbles and fitted the Mosrite thimbles inside them, but not quite enough intonation adjustment on the 1st str. so took out the CP thimbles and moved the Mosrite thimbles forward in the hole, filled the rest with epoxy putty for now, still just barely enough adjustment, I will eventually plug and re-drill a little further forward when I re-fin.
User avatar
Dave
TOTALLY MODD
Posts: 10439
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:35 pm
Location: UK - Southampton

Post by Dave »

Sweet where did you get the Mos bridge?
iCEByTes wrote:5 Most Jizz face maker Solo�s , classic Rock music i ever listened.
iCEByTes wrote:Blunt a joint , Take the Touch , Listen this.
User avatar
Loco3
.
.
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:47 am
Location: The rolling hills of Nimbin

Post by Loco3 »

Dave wrote:Sweet where did you get the Mos bridge?
The fleabay, only $25, cheap enough to try, would probably need half a deck of cards in the neck pocket if you wanted to use a mute though, as the bridge is a touch higher than stock.

Cheers, Steve
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

friend of mine had one on a Jazzmaster project, and I did not like it one bit!
The little wheelies on it were way too small to hold the lowest two strings. Sure, maybe the trem's action was a little smoother, but it didnt matter, because as soon as you gave your strum any guts at all it was flying E-string city.

I imagine it might be a little better with the trem a little closer to the bridge on the CP, but as far as I'm concerned (yes, I'll say it again) the CP jag is the closest to perfect Jag. The only reason I have an AV jag is because i was offered an INSANE deal on it, and it was already tricked out with a buzz stop, mustang bridge, and 3 way toggle. The CP trem always seemed rock solid to me, and just as smooth as the AV.
avj wrote:I am, and it's rad. The radius disparity between 9.5" and what is likely close to 12" on the one linked below is negligible and certainly not as noticeable as, say, using that bridge on a vintage-spec 7.25" radius. I use that exact one and it's a simple drop-in; no bubbles, no troubles. I threw one on both my CP Jag and CP JM and haven't looked back. I found no issue with string pops with 11s on the Jag and 10s on the JM, and I play the absolute piss out of both. I found trem action to be improved, as the AOM bridge doesn't really rock in the thimbles like a traditional Jag/JM bridge does because the posts screw in.
This is encouraging, though. I wouldnt make the change, but it looks like it works for mr. avj.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury