interesting. if the guys right, a collector will pay high dollar for it. But when the dude says, "there will be paper work by Jimi's management." you have to be skeptical.
also, as I wrote that, I'm not sure any collector really has interest in a guitar that Hendrix "owned" but never played. Can't imagine that will sell for anymore than a normal bronco.
hotrodperlmutter wrote:as long as you can get his estate to provide notarized paperwork, and a cert. of authenticity, you can charge whatever you want.
it's worth what someone will pay.
no, no, no. I'm not arguing about the worth of the item. A cheap chinese copy of a gibson is wroth $700 because someone will buy it, but that certainly isn't the actual value of the guitar.
right now, he shows no proof of a notarized letter of authenticity, so, I have just as much proof that my strat was jimi's. And he's charging 50k for it? All I'm saying is that if the guitar was real and he really needed the $, why would he not go to EXTREME lengths to prove it was in fact owned by Hendrix and mention every single thing he's done to prove it was him. So, either A. the bronco is fake or B. He doesn't seem to understand the importance of verifying his piece. Either way, if you were an actual buyer, there is no way you'd buy this guitar.