I need GFS Vintage Split sound clips

Painting? Routing? Set-up tips? Or just straight-up making a guitar from scratch? Post here, and post pics!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
luciguci
.
.
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:46 am

I need GFS Vintage Split sound clips

Post by luciguci »

Does anyone have soundclips for the GFS Vintage Split Humbuckers? There's almost no clips of anyone using them, except for crappy ones recording straight from the camera and the sound clipping badly. If anyone has them and can record, I would be so grateful.
Doog wrote:Tone is stored in the balls
theshadowofseattle wrote:That's why there's two: one for pee, one for tone.
🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 (she/they)
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

they just sound like regular humbuckers. they do look cool though.
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
User avatar
luciguci
.
.
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:46 am

Post by luciguci »

Really? because I'd imagine have half of each coil filled in with wax instead of pole pieces would make them sound different, like humbucking split singles, but I want to hear how they sound because it's really uncommon.

Like so, Fender reissue on the left, GFS on the right, half of each coil is filled with wax.

Image
Doog wrote:Tone is stored in the balls
theshadowofseattle wrote:That's why there's two: one for pee, one for tone.
🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 (she/they)
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

weird. they don't have screws on the bottom? if they're really just empty, it probably sounds a bit like this: http://shortscale.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47319
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
User avatar
luciguci
.
.
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:46 am

Post by luciguci »

Mages wrote:they don't have screws on the bottom?
Three in the top coil on the bass side, three in the bottom coil on the treble side. So it's like a split single coil. so neither row is full.
Doog wrote:Tone is stored in the balls
theshadowofseattle wrote:That's why there's two: one for pee, one for tone.
🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 (she/they)
User avatar
SKC Willie
Bunk Ass Fuck
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO
Contact:

Post by SKC Willie »

I can do some samples here in a couple of days. I've got them in the Epiphone Dot I actually got from Mages.

They don't sound like a typical humbucker but they're definitely voice more like a traditional bucker than the WRHBs.
twitter.com/skcwillie

follow me . . . . you won't
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

They just sound like buckers to me, and not particularly good ones. They aren't copies of WRHBs, they're modeled after Fralin P92s which were meant to be like WRHBs but weren't the same at all... I think they were alnico V but the GFS may just be a ceramic magnet (can't remember, certainly reminds me of a ceramic bucker). I had one in the bridge of my Epi G400 but took it out in favour of an Alnico II PAF which was a lot nicer, then a Super Distortion which was a different ballpark altogether.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
luciguci
.
.
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:46 am

Post by luciguci »

SKC Willie wrote:I can do some samples here in a couple of days. I've got them in the Epiphone Dot I actually got from Mages.

They don't sound like a typical humbucker but they're definitely voice more like a traditional bucker than the WRHBs.
Cool, thanks. And I kinda figured, but if it was, it would be priced way higher.
Doog wrote:Tone is stored in the balls
theshadowofseattle wrote:That's why there's two: one for pee, one for tone.
🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 (she/they)