Trem Wars
Moderated By: mods
- taylornutt
- .
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Trem Wars
I have been wanting to learn how to effectly use the "reverb" handles on my guitars. I am mostly a rhythm player, so I just never bothered with them. Last night, I played all my guitars with Tremolos except for my Coronado II (missing "reverb" handle). I played the same song each time, used the bridge pickup, and played them in to the same amp settings on Amplitube on my iPad.
My guitars were setup like so:
Fender CompStang RI (setup with 12s and Lace Sensor Red in Bridge)
Fender Mullet-stang(setup with 11s)
Fender Bronco (setup with .10s)
Fender AVRI Jaguar (Setup with .11s)
Observations:
1)The Fender Bronco was more responsive and effective for quick wobbles than either Mustang guitar. The Bronco trem has a more limited range. Bronco kept it's tune very well. The modified Strat arm that came with the guitar sits in the perfect location for quick access but doesn't get in the way of strumming.
2) Both Mustangs were better for smoother, deeper dives than the Bronco. The Compstang with the heavier strings was better suited for quick wobbles than the Mullet-stang with .11s. The trem arm slowly slips down and dangles after a few uses.
3) Jaguar has the smoothest, most versatile tremolo. You can do the suble and deep dives and it stays in tune. The arms stays in place at first, but also drops down after some use.
The Bronco Trem is kinda a hybrid between the Mustang and Jaguar Trems. It has the saddles and trim in one unit like the Mustang, but the single spring design of the Bronco mimics the Jaguar. The Bronco was Leo Fender's last tremolo he designed before he left Fender, but it wasn't used until the Bronco was released in 1967.
Overall, I like all 3 trems. The Jaguar is definitely the best overall, but the Mustang has some definite advantages with the two spring design for even deep dives. The Bronco is great for quick trem, but not as good for the deeper dive bombs.
Post your experiences with your Shortscale trems.
My guitars were setup like so:
Fender CompStang RI (setup with 12s and Lace Sensor Red in Bridge)
Fender Mullet-stang(setup with 11s)
Fender Bronco (setup with .10s)
Fender AVRI Jaguar (Setup with .11s)
Observations:
1)The Fender Bronco was more responsive and effective for quick wobbles than either Mustang guitar. The Bronco trem has a more limited range. Bronco kept it's tune very well. The modified Strat arm that came with the guitar sits in the perfect location for quick access but doesn't get in the way of strumming.
2) Both Mustangs were better for smoother, deeper dives than the Bronco. The Compstang with the heavier strings was better suited for quick wobbles than the Mullet-stang with .11s. The trem arm slowly slips down and dangles after a few uses.
3) Jaguar has the smoothest, most versatile tremolo. You can do the suble and deep dives and it stays in tune. The arms stays in place at first, but also drops down after some use.
The Bronco Trem is kinda a hybrid between the Mustang and Jaguar Trems. It has the saddles and trim in one unit like the Mustang, but the single spring design of the Bronco mimics the Jaguar. The Bronco was Leo Fender's last tremolo he designed before he left Fender, but it wasn't used until the Bronco was released in 1967.
Overall, I like all 3 trems. The Jaguar is definitely the best overall, but the Mustang has some definite advantages with the two spring design for even deep dives. The Bronco is great for quick trem, but not as good for the deeper dive bombs.
Post your experiences with your Shortscale trems.
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
I can't really speak much for the Mustang or Bronco, but I love my Jaguar trem. It's very smooth and stays in tune without any problems. The only thing I don't like is the trem arm. To me, I feels like it sits too high. Maybe it's the way I use it when I play, but I feel like it should be a lot lower than it is. I like to be able to hold it while I'm strumming. I've been thinking about bending it so that it will be easier to use when I'm playing it.
As for the trem arm staying in place, I recently bought a stay-trem, but I haven't had a chance to install it yet. It seems like a great idea, so I can't wait to try it out.
As for the trem arm staying in place, I recently bought a stay-trem, but I haven't had a chance to install it yet. It seems like a great idea, so I can't wait to try it out.
George wrote:For being able to play with broken strings, alt-tunings and offering the nicest action and stability: Jaguar über alles.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
- NoisemakerEffects
- .
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:10 pm
- Location: Montana
- Contact:
- taylornutt
- .
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Since you are getting a Stay-trem it may not matter, but make sure you are pushing the trem arm all the way in until it "snaps". I had the same problem because I was not putting it in all the way.dren68 wrote:I can't really speak much for the Mustang or Bronco, but I love my Jaguar trem. It's very smooth and stays in tune without any problems. The only thing I don't like is the trem arm. To me, I feels like it sits too high. Maybe it's the way I use it when I play, but I feel like it should be a lot lower than it is. I like to be able to hold it while I'm strumming. I've been thinking about bending it so that it will be easier to use when I'm playing it.
As for the trem arm staying in place, I recently bought a stay-trem, but I haven't had a chance to install it yet. It seems like a great idea, so I can't wait to try it out.
I plan to get a Stay-trem for my upcoming Jazzmaster project.
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
- Johnny Noir
- .
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:02 am
- Location: Lille, France
- Contact:
Yeah I second Taylor's suggestion, dren... my CIJ Jag's arm is very comfy to hold while playing, it's even long enough that I can pick anywhere I want (I usually play over the neck pickup when holding it). And if anything it's TOO low on occasion, interfered with the buzzstop when I had that installed... I've never been one to fiddle with the inner workings of the Jag tailpiece much though, it just sorta always worked for me wherever it was... things can slip on the Japanese ones though and there's a couple decades of good fix-it tips on the net to help you out with almost any probs.taylornutt wrote:make sure you are pushing the trem arm all the way in until it "snaps". .dren68 wrote:I can't really speak much for the Mustang or Bronco, but I love my Jaguar trem. It's very smooth and stays in tune without any problems. The only thing I don't like is the trem arm. To me, I feels like it sits too high. Maybe it's the way I use it when I play, but I feel like it should be a lot lower than it is. I like to be able to hold it while I'm strumming. I've been thinking about bending it so that it will be easier to use when I'm playing it.
There was this guy in the old days of JS that had his shortie trems set-up really rock solid (with .009s)
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
- taylornutt
- .
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
I am subscribed to him on Youtube. I have conversed with him a few times, once about Mustang Trem height.Fran wrote:Mad-Mike!! He is a great player and knew how to get 110% from a Mustang trem.
I love pretty much all his main guitars, especially his homemade Jazzmaster and his vintage Mustang. I kinda like how he goes through the background of all his gear.
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
J Mascis Jazzmaster | AVRI Jaguar | Tuxedo-stang |Fender Toronado GT |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
Squier FSR Sparkle Jaguar | Squier CV Mustang |1971 Fender Bronco| Baja Telecaster |
Yeah, I think that may be the problem. I'm always scared to push too hard because I think I'm going to break something for some reason. I'll try not to be such a wuss with it and maybe that will do the trick.taylornutt wrote:Since you are getting a Stay-trem it may not matter, but make sure you are pushing the trem arm all the way in until it "snaps". I had the same problem because I was not putting it in all the way.dren68 wrote:I can't really speak much for the Mustang or Bronco, but I love my Jaguar trem. It's very smooth and stays in tune without any problems. The only thing I don't like is the trem arm. To me, I feels like it sits too high. Maybe it's the way I use it when I play, but I feel like it should be a lot lower than it is. I like to be able to hold it while I'm strumming. I've been thinking about bending it so that it will be easier to use when I'm playing it.
As for the trem arm staying in place, I recently bought a stay-trem, but I haven't had a chance to install it yet. It seems like a great idea, so I can't wait to try it out.
I plan to get a Stay-trem for my upcoming Jazzmaster project.
Can someone please post a picture of how far in the trem arm should be?
I'm pushing in hard but no snap. Wondering if the screw needs to be tightened.
EDIT: On a Staytrem I mean.
I'm pushing in hard but no snap. Wondering if the screw needs to be tightened.
EDIT: On a Staytrem I mean.
Last edited by George on Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wow, that guy can shred. I've never heard VH played on a Jaguar.paul_ wrote:Yeah I second Taylor's suggestion, dren... my CIJ Jag's arm is very comfy to hold while playing, it's even long enough that I can pick anywhere I want (I usually play over the neck pickup when holding it). And if anything it's TOO low on occasion, interfered with the buzzstop when I had that installed... I've never been one to fiddle with the inner workings of the Jag tailpiece much though, it just sorta always worked for me wherever it was... things can slip on the Japanese ones though and there's a couple decades of good fix-it tips on the net to help you out with almost any probs.taylornutt wrote:make sure you are pushing the trem arm all the way in until it "snaps". .dren68 wrote:I can't really speak much for the Mustang or Bronco, but I love my Jaguar trem. It's very smooth and stays in tune without any problems. The only thing I don't like is the trem arm. To me, I feels like it sits too high. Maybe it's the way I use it when I play, but I feel like it should be a lot lower than it is. I like to be able to hold it while I'm strumming. I've been thinking about bending it so that it will be easier to use when I'm playing it.
There was this guy in the old days of JS that had his shortie trems set-up really rock solid (with .009s)
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
- taylornutt
- .
- Posts: 4908
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Concretebadger
- .
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
- Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
- Contact:
I have to say that guy's Jag vid is almost enough to make me want one of my own...I'm not a shredder by any stretch, but it's a great advert for how versatile Jazzes and Jags can be. Given how over-engineered the design is in the rocking bridge and length of the arm, maybe I shouldn't be so surprised at the range of pitch change.
Honestly, I've not had any issue with my JM's trem at all either. When it's properly adjusted (which, I admit, takes some investment of time and effort initially) the tuning stability is perfectly fine, and I also like the 'gentler' action.
I'm still not convinced by the Mustang trem though. The steeper string break angle between the bridge and tailpice makes me constantly worried about the bridge staying upright; it seems to want to tip away from the tailpiece and mess with the intonation. Maybe need a bit more time to get used to it.
Honestly, I've not had any issue with my JM's trem at all either. When it's properly adjusted (which, I admit, takes some investment of time and effort initially) the tuning stability is perfectly fine, and I also like the 'gentler' action.
I'm still not convinced by the Mustang trem though. The steeper string break angle between the bridge and tailpice makes me constantly worried about the bridge staying upright; it seems to want to tip away from the tailpiece and mess with the intonation. Maybe need a bit more time to get used to it.
I like Mad Mikes view on the Mustang trem, basically that string gauges were much higher when they were designed so the tension is actually too high on the stock setup when using modern string gauges, meaning that by attempting to make it more stable by increasing the tension while making it more stable than the middle tension setting you're probably sacrificing the functionality of the trem unit.
Could 11s and the spring on the lowest tension be the key to having a perfectly set-up Mustang? I might give it a try next time I swap out the strings on mine.
I think in Mikes video he says he removed one of the springs in his trem all together cos it seized up or something...
Could 11s and the spring on the lowest tension be the key to having a perfectly set-up Mustang? I might give it a try next time I swap out the strings on mine.
I think in Mikes video he says he removed one of the springs in his trem all together cos it seized up or something...