Sorry, guys! no good news here.

Moderated By: mods
So is the problem that the neck is too heavy or that the fingerboard is too flat? Fender's website says the radius is 9.5." I thought Gibsons were between 12" and 15" generally?drew199321 wrote:Finally, the neck is way too chunky. Fender, in it's attempt to compete with Gibson's new lineup, gave the new SS a neck radius larger than a Les Paul. Coming from a guy who uses an old Musicmaster as my main, I can't stand it. I feel like I'm playing the broad end of a cricket bat.
Sounds like she needs a proper setup before condemning the pickups. With the strings pinky height above the pickups you aren't getting a true representation of what the pickups are capable of producing. I have to admit that I am not a fan guitars without tone controls and some modding of the electronics may be required to hone this beast sonically.drew199321 wrote:I hate to say it first, guys, but from personal experience I can now say that the new SS is terrible. The pickups are horrendous. It's all mid-range and no bite. The action sucks. All the demo guitars had string height high enough that you could fit a fucking pinky under it. NOPE. Finally, the neck is way too chunky. Fender, in it's attempt to compete with Gibson's new lineup, gave the new SS a neck radius larger than a Les Paul. Coming from a guy who uses an old Musicmaster as my main, I can't stand it. I feel like I'm playing the broad end of a cricket bat.
Sorry, guys! no good news here.
Aye, that's what I thought. Also, I've never been to NAMM but understand it's incredibly noisy, so that you wouldn't be able to hear properly what something sounds like.Cymbaline wrote:Shouldnt you play one that's properly set up before putting the nail in its coffin?