Cyclone II or Mustang Special?

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

MMPicker
.
.
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:55 am

Post by MMPicker »

speedfish wrote: ..there were no American made Cyclones that I am aware of.
"US Cyclone
The Cyclone was also promoted as a USA-made guitar for a brief time in 2000. The US Cyclone featured two dual-coil ceramic Vintage Noiseless single-coils and a modern 2-point synchronized vibrato with stainless steel saddles. The Custom Cyclone had similar features, but used two Gold Lace Sensor pickups with black covers and a custom vintage 2-point tremolo bridge with bent solid steel saddles. Both guitars were made at the Fender Custom Shop. These American-made Cyclones were gone at the end of 2001."

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fender_Cyclone"


"In 2000, the Fender Cyclone debuted for sale as a USA-made guitar, although it was originally featured two years earlier at the Summer NAMM convention.

The Cyclone featured two single coil noiseless pickups with white covers and exposed pole-pieces, a two-point stainless steel vibrato with steel bridge saddles.

The vibrato unit was similar to a Stratocaster unit and the springs were in a cavity in the guitars back. There was a three-way switch, similar to those Gibson used that was place on the lower horn.

The upgraded model was named the Custom Cyclone had the same accoutrements, but had Gold Lace sensor pickups with black covers. The Cyclones had one tone and one volume control. Both potentiometers were housed on a stainless steel plate, much like that of a Jaguar. Both guitars were produced for only one year."
"http://uniqueguitar.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... clone.html"

picture:
"http://m.digimart.net/guitar/inst_detai ... DS01809772"
"http://www.j-guitar.com/product_id152152.html"
"http://homepage3.nifty.com/sinchang/mus ... tars2.html"
User avatar
jagsonic
.
.
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by jagsonic »

Yeah, there are american made cyclones. But these are the ones with two singlecoils. Not the cyclone II with the three jaguarpickups. It is all mexicanmade. But with two kinds of bridgesystems (as it seems).
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

MMPicker wrote:
speedfish wrote: ..there were no American made Cyclones that I am aware of.
"US Cyclone
The Cyclone was also promoted as a USA-made guitar for a brief time in 2000. The US Cyclone featured two dual-coil ceramic Vintage Noiseless single-coils and a modern 2-point synchronized vibrato with stainless steel saddles. The Custom Cyclone had similar features, but used two Gold Lace Sensor pickups with black covers and a custom vintage 2-point tremolo bridge with bent solid steel saddles. Both guitars were made at the Fender Custom Shop. These American-made Cyclones were gone at the end of 2001."

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fender_Cyclone"


"In 2000, the Fender Cyclone debuted for sale as a USA-made guitar, although it was originally featured two years earlier at the Summer NAMM convention.

The Cyclone featured two single coil noiseless pickups with white covers and exposed pole-pieces, a two-point stainless steel vibrato with steel bridge saddles.

The vibrato unit was similar to a Stratocaster unit and the springs were in a cavity in the guitars back. There was a three-way switch, similar to those Gibson used that was place on the lower horn.

The upgraded model was named the Custom Cyclone had the same accoutrements, but had Gold Lace sensor pickups with black covers. The Cyclones had one tone and one volume control. Both potentiometers were housed on a stainless steel plate, much like that of a Jaguar. Both guitars were produced for only one year."
"http://uniqueguitar.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... clone.html"

picture:
"http://m.digimart.net/guitar/inst_detai ... DS01809772"
"http://www.j-guitar.com/product_id152152.html"
"http://homepage3.nifty.com/sinchang/mus ... tars2.html"
Edit: Cyclone II's as the original post pertains to, but good work there!
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
User avatar
Awstin
.
.
Posts: 3935
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:31 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by Awstin »

THESE... If I am not mistaken are the U.S. Models.


Image
Congratulations! Your Punkacc9 evolved into Awstin.
User avatar
jagsonic
.
.
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by jagsonic »

Yes. Very cool things. 8)
User avatar
jculpjr
.
.
Posts: 561
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:58 pm

Post by jculpjr »

I've never seen this color before
Ebay
User avatar
kypdurron
.
.
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Kaiser Wilhelm Kuntry

Post by kypdurron »

that picture may still be a photoshop mistake, but it propably doesn_t matter, if no one has ever seen a Cyclone II with that kind of hardware.

I own a Cyclone II and played the Pawn Shop Mustang in a shop. (the older japanese one).

The PS Mustang is the overall better guitar, imho. it has superior building quality, a much nicer neck and fretboard, it has pickups that work well with it and it has a ton of switching options that go from plinky single coil sounds to fat humbucker sounds. for 450 € new it will be hard impossible to find anything better (at Fender).

But, as the others have said, it's just a new guitar. the Cyclone II is an odd rarity and you propably won't have the chance to buy another at acceptable money. and it has a trem.

the PS Mustang may become an oddball rarity too, think of how short the time was they offered the japanese ones. but it isn't exactly sought after yet.

So better buy them both :D
Obi Wan says: The Jundland Wastes are not to be traveled lightly.

strat-talk says: Shortscale is a crazy place. There seems to be no rules at all and they're all insane!
User avatar
jagsonic
.
.
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by jagsonic »

kypdurron wrote:So better buy them both :D
oh, i think you actually caught my conflict :D

the only way to get out of that tight spot will be buying nothing at all :oops: 8)
User avatar
Dokterrock
.
.
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Dokterrock »

I put out a feeler thread over on OSG for my Cyclone II and I was told that $700 was not an unfair price for it. Definitely more than I expected, so 500 euros doesn't seem that crazy. I was hoping someone had an HH model they'd trade me for it but no dice.
User avatar
kypdurron
.
.
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Kaiser Wilhelm Kuntry

Post by kypdurron »

yours was the blue one that is more rare, and in pristine condition, wasn't it? 500 € might work for these, if you sell with patience. but is definitely on the high end for a red CyII with dings and dongs. after all, these price differences are normal fluctuation on a used market. and, when you look at it rationally, 700 $ can buy you a much nicer guitar.
Obi Wan says: The Jundland Wastes are not to be traveled lightly.

strat-talk says: Shortscale is a crazy place. There seems to be no rules at all and they're all insane!
User avatar
Dokterrock
.
.
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Dokterrock »

Mine's the one in my avatar - it had actually been cannibalized and I restored it, so I don't actually have the original pickups or guard.

You're definitely right about how that kind of money could probably get me a nicer guitar, but damn, the number of these on the market has shrunk considerably since even a year ago when I bought it.
MMPicker
.
.
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:55 am

Post by MMPicker »

Just because something is rare doesn't mean I necessarily want to be playing it.
I would get the one I thought I'd rather play, personally.

These are different enough guitars that one should be able to develop a preference based on their different specs.
They are different in:
Tone- production features:pickups and pot values too I think.
Playability-related features: scale length, frets, radius, weight, switching, trems

If it were me, I would decide on that basis. Period. (Within reason; in which I would include this case).

Who cares if a guitar is some relatively small amount underpriced if I'd rather not play it.
User avatar
jagsonic
.
.
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by jagsonic »

MMPicker wrote:Just because something is rare doesn't mean I necessarily want to be playing it.
I would get the one I thought I'd rather play, personally.

These are different enough guitars that one should be able to develop a preference based on their different specs.
They are different in:
Tone- production features:pickups and pot values too I think.
Playability-related features: scale length, frets, radius, weight, switching, trems

If it were me, I would decide on that basis. Period. (Within reason; in which I would include this case).

Who cares if a guitar is some relatively small amount underpriced if I'd rather not play it.
Yes, i'm totally in. After reflecting some days it will be the best to buy the guitar i've played and liked instead of buying a guitar i never had my hand, and that's the mustang special. So i think i will go for it...
User avatar
jculpjr
.
.
Posts: 561
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:58 pm

Post by jculpjr »

Punkacc9 wrote:THESE... If I am not mistaken are the U.S. Models.


Image
Another photo of the rare beast
Image
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

jagsonic wrote:
MMPicker wrote:Just because something is rare doesn't mean I necessarily want to be playing it.
I would get the one I thought I'd rather play, personally.

These are different enough guitars that one should be able to develop a preference based on their different specs.
They are different in:
Tone- production features:pickups and pot values too I think.
Playability-related features: scale length, frets, radius, weight, switching, trems

If it were me, I would decide on that basis. Period. (Within reason; in which I would include this case).

Who cares if a guitar is some relatively small amount underpriced if I'd rather not play it.
Yes, i'm totally in. After reflecting some days it will be the best to buy the guitar i've played and liked instead of buying a guitar i never had my hand, and that's the mustang special. So i think i will go for it...
Well done brother. 8)
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
User avatar
jagsonic
.
.
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Mustang or Cyclone? Got now a VM Jag...

Post by jagsonic »

so i went to the store and wanted to buy the mustang and it was sold half an hour ago! :shock:

after having a short time of breathing, i just bought a vm jaguar :twisted:

... and it was the all-time right decision! such a great playing and sounding guitar!!!


Image
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

Certainly not a bad choice at all :)
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press