NPD: Morley classic wah

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

NPD: Morley classic wah

Post by Concretebadger »

I used to have a Vox 847, which sounded nice but there were a few things I didn't like about it: bad bypass, lack of clarity with distortion, annoying stiff on/off switch at the toe end. I traded it for a Morley and I think I like the Morley more.

I will say though that the factory setting of the LED/photoresistor is a bit too trebly for me. Pushing them further apart/prodding one to point at a slight angle makes it darker and adds some midrange, and improves it a lot.

For a cheap wah I'm pretty happy with it. Shame it's a bit too big to fit on my board, but I'm only an occasional wah user.
User avatar
rps-10
.
.
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:41 pm
Location: S.E. WALES
Contact:

Post by rps-10 »

Do like Morley wahs
Mike wrote:All my LEDs are bright, the blues are bright as all hell.
mezzio13 wrote:JJ makes sweeps look easy and effortless. His nick name should be broom.
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

a friend of mine found a morley wah in a truck bed. it ad the bypass switch on the side, which i liked, and t was a bit smaller in size. the only bad part was it didn't have much color to it and the pot was forever scratchy no matter what i did to it. and if i remember correctly it was actually a slider that relied on a piece of clear fishing line to move it back and forth and i couldn't find one to replace it with at the time.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

Have got a Morley Bad Horsie which is now my oldest pedal I still own, must have got it in 2001 or something. I really like it and it has never let me down. You do sacrifice being able to set it at cocked and leave it, but the optical switching is great. Ideally I'd like something with a smaller footprint, but that's not a huge thing.
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Hate the switchless ones. Too subtle for me, plus no midrange filter by leaving it half-cocked, etc... and as big as a house.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

paul_ wrote:Too subtle for me...
That's probably one of the main reasons I like mine.
User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

Post by Concretebadger »

Yeah, I'm not keen on the idea of switchless either. For some people it's okay I guess, but fortunately this one has the switch on the side near where your heel goes, which is better than both the traditional and the switchless designs. Which means I can do the Michael Schenker thing if I want. The lack of 'colour' or midrange honk is a actually better with distortion, but perhaps not as warm on cleans.

The only annoyance is that the 'throw' of the treadle puts my toes lower than my heel at the top end of the sweep. Which I solve by propping up the front end of the pedal with something like an empty ring binder or dvd case. :P