Zachary guitars: wtf?

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

robert(original) wrote:i like that he points out that.
1.) fancy wood does not make a guitar sound any better
2.) thick poly finishes are very plastic like
but he kinda double fucks himself in the ass in the article by stating that wood doesn't matter, and proves it by using discaded pine(leo started out using pine)
and the goes on to say that pine resonates and tries to imply that an oil finish will let the tone of the instrument ring thru.
BULLSHIT!
ITS A SOLID BODY, BOLT ON GUITAR.
YOUR "TONE" COMES IN THE FORM OF A POTENTIOMETER VALUE!!!!
im fucking sick of hearing that crap. there is more tone in your picking style and playing style than there is in the difference of wood or finish, IN THE CONTEXT OF AN ELECTRIC SOLIDBODY BOLT ON GUITAR.
as far as acoustics go, thats another ballgame. different wood and finishes will affect the sound. as well as bracing styles. body depth etc etc.
the guy has a few points. but he uses them to stab himself in the cock.
I respectfully disagree. Two of the same make/model/wood will not sound/resonate the same through the same amp. Your personallity/picking style will ring through, but the guitars will not be necessarily sound equal in quality when heard. In my experience the guitar that sounds better unamplified sounds better amplified.
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
User avatar
Dave
TOTALLY MODD
Posts: 10439
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:35 pm
Location: UK - Southampton

Post by Dave »

With all due respect, these kinds of statements are only valid when you have done so in a completely blind test with as physically identical gear (wood excepting) as is controllable in our hypothetical experiment.... or you are more likely to be subject to the clinically observed cognitive phenomena called 'Confirmation Bias'.

Do I think wood would make any difference? Yes (difference always equals a difference), but its effect would be so microscopic that I doubt that it is noticeable consciously to most. in fact difference might be so small that minor inconsistencies in the manufacturing of any given pots or capacitors might equal as great a difference between two 'identical' guitars. How tightly the neck screws are done up might yield similarly tiny variables. It really is the realm of the uncontrollably small you're talking about.... Either opinion is pretty much just hypothesis without some hard scientific tests.
User avatar
BearBoy
.
.
Posts: 7013
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:27 am
Location: Strung up to the lemons

Post by BearBoy »

Zachary Guitars wrote:The idea of people with phisical (sic) disabilities buying Zachs just bugs me.
Nice bloke.
User avatar
SKC Willie
Bunk Ass Fuck
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 pm
Location: Columbia, MO
Contact:

Post by SKC Willie »

Dave wrote:Either opinion is pretty much just hypothesis without some hard scientific tests.
A dude on TDPRI did a recording of a bunch of different guitars, with different woods, different pickups etc. and asked people to guess what they were. Most people could tell the difference between a strat and a les paul or a tele and an SG but it was tough to tell the difference between a strat and a tele on a recording. And these were people who played/listened to guitars all the time. So, if you're telling me the guitar sounds better when it's not plugged into an amp, I would somewhat agree but when you use the power of EQ, the type of wood has so little effect, it can't be noticed. It's hard to tell the difference between ash, pine, or plywood.

Anything in the electronics can change tone. RobOG is totally right. The pots in your guitar effect the tone much more than wood ever will.
Last edited by SKC Willie on Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
twitter.com/skcwillie

follow me . . . . you won't
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

the j.s. body i built for.... shit i don't remember who. but it was hardtail and ash. anywho. i took apart my j.s. and put all the parts on the ash hardtail body.
and guess what. it sounded exactly the same.
so ash hartail vs basswood top load trem system= same fucking sound.
thats about as good as it gets. same electronics. same player. same neck, same string gauge. everything really. except for the bridge style and the wood. which supposedly make the most difference(depending on which guitar wanker your listening to)
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Robert is right but I would add that all the "tone" of a bolt-on (i.e. resonant properties and timbre) is in the neck. THIS is what's different on every guitar, even two consecutive production line imports.

I've swapped this MIM Classic '70s RI Strat's neck around on a GFS paulownia and an old Squier alder body (I converted it to a 4-bolt), it always sounds the same. It's a distinctively bassy and boomy sounding Strat. Everyone who plays it unplugged kind of raises an eyebrow. I want to put it on a VM Jazzmaster body so bad.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

Here ya go:



I bet it would sound better made from red brick :wink:
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister