goddamn it I guess just like strats
Moderated By: mods
Your dream looks p tight.iCEByTes wrote:my dream is this
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars/ ... ric-guitar
Olympic pearl Rosewood
+
FiberCarbon Pickguard , true fibercarbon
+
Curtis Novak lipticks 3x
+
CTS 250k Pots and Metal knobs barrel i think
+
Schaller strapslock
will looks bestial
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
What did they look like in 1954?
I used to think they were boring, especially the black/ white PG variety. But in the right colors they look great. Then I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special. Sure they and their knock offs are common as dirt but get one in the right combination and they still look like they're from the future. I've really come around to them.
Re: What did they look like in 1954?
This. It looked like a spaceship, and the body and trem design are two of the most historically noteworthy innovations in electric guitar design ever, they've just become so ubiquitous that we're used to them now. Forget about the Jazzmaster or Mustang having turned out like they did if not for the Strat. Page, Beck, Harrison, Knopfler etc all talked about seeing them in shops as kids and getting goosebumps like they were looking at a Ferrari or something. A TV press guy writing a review of Buddy Holly on Ed Sullivan didn't even realize it was a guitar, he was writing about the weird sound of Holly's futuristic electronic banjo driving his band.61fury wrote: I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special.
Remember that when the Strat came out the only solidbody electrics similarly fancy to them in the shops were butterscotch/blackguard Teles and Goldtop P90 Les Pauls. The Strat had way more going on, it changed the whole game.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
- dots
- BADmin (he/him)
- Posts: 1022402
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
- Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
- Contact:
Re: What did they look like in 1954?
love this. strats get some hate around here, and i have always felt it undeserved. this post says it all.paul_ wrote:This. It looked like a spaceship, and the body and trem design are two of the most historically noteworthy innovations in electric guitar design ever, they've just become so ubiquitous that we're used to them now. Forget about the Jazzmaster or Mustang having turned out like they did if not for the Strat. Page, Beck, Harrison, Knopfler etc all talked about seeing them in shops as kids and getting goosebumps like they were looking at a Ferrari or something. A TV press guy writing a review of Buddy Holly on Ed Sullivan didn't even realize it was a guitar, he was writing about the weird sound of Holly's futuristic electronic banjo driving his band.61fury wrote: I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special.
Remember that when the Strat came out the only solidbody electrics similarly fancy to them in the shops were butterscotch/blackguard Teles and Goldtop P90 Les Pauls. The Strat had way more going on, it changed the whole game.
Aye, great stuff to think about there, paul_.
The collage of my ST68-TX was done using good ol' Comic Life, which I usually use just to make Shortscale banners.
Aren't they charming? I wish that two-pickuper was mine!izodiak wrote:Ultratwin You know how to post nice stratocasters ! Really good looking both of them !
The collage of my ST68-TX was done using good ol' Comic Life, which I usually use just to make Shortscale banners.
When I was first asked to play in Lee Seunghwan's band, my two friends on guitar had a 3TS '63 and a '64 respectively. One of them, originally purchased for $16000, just got sold for $25000.
2005 Backstage ULTRALOLZ.
I believe this one was the '64, it was kinda unnerving just holding the thing.
2005 Backstage ULTRALOLZ.
I believe this one was the '64, it was kinda unnerving just holding the thing.
► Show Spoiler
i watched the woodstock documentary this last weekend and it ended w jimmy hendrix playing and the cameraman focused in on his face and cropped out his hands and guitar! what the hell man???Fran wrote:Good post paul.
It is truly iconic and the design still looks fresh and futuristic today.
I remember reading somewhere that Strat sales were floundering in the 60's until Hendrix arrived. The rest is history.
George wrote:in the future there must be only guitars or only computers
theshadowofseattle wrote:TYPICAL AMERICAN BAND LIKE JAY Z, AXE BODY SPRAY, AND THE VENTURES.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac637/ac637dc36d4134ca9e5ce77c743df090951943bb" alt="Image"
That's lovely. I never tire of seeing a properly old-school Strat re-shaped/coloured by years of use and exposure to the elements... I know what you mean by "unnerving" though, it always strikes me how pre-CBS Fenders are almost invariably all beat-up and we know they're rugged, yet I handle them more carefully than I would an antique vase or something.ultratwin wrote:the '64
[pics]
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
Re: What did they look like in 1954?
Aye, very good points both. Can't think what else could be done to make a strat any more visually appealing - it's about perfect. It's only its ubiquity that makes some guitarists love them less.paul_ wrote:This. It looked like a spaceship, and the body and trem design are two of the most historically noteworthy innovations in electric guitar design ever, they've just become so ubiquitous that we're used to them now. Forget about the Jazzmaster or Mustang having turned out like they did if not for the Strat. Page, Beck, Harrison, Knopfler etc all talked about seeing them in shops as kids and getting goosebumps like they were looking at a Ferrari or something. A TV press guy writing a review of Buddy Holly on Ed Sullivan didn't even realize it was a guitar, he was writing about the weird sound of Holly's futuristic electronic banjo driving his band.61fury wrote: I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special.
Remember that when the Strat came out the only solidbody electrics similarly fancy to them in the shops were butterscotch/blackguard Teles and Goldtop P90 Les Pauls. The Strat had way more going on, it changed the whole game.
Paul - do yoy have a link to that Buddy Holly factlet? I love that...
Re: What did they look like in 1954?
Eh, no. I don't like them, hate the contours, hate the bridge entirely in both looks and function and the amount of routing it requires, hate the placement of the controls, hate the sound, hate the three pickups, hate the switching, hate the scale, hate the tuners. There's almost nothing I like about strats at all and it's not how common they are.benecol wrote: Aye, very good points both. Can't think what else could be done to make a strat any more visually appealing - it's about perfect. It's only its ubiquity that makes some guitarists love them less.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
I like my Musicmaster. It has none of the problems the strat has.
My point is only to say that it's not envy or ubiquity of the Strat that makes some people dislike them. Some just actually hate the stupid things. Y'all can go back to your circlejerk on the strat, it's fine.
Okay, I admit I do fucking hate everything.
My point is only to say that it's not envy or ubiquity of the Strat that makes some people dislike them. Some just actually hate the stupid things. Y'all can go back to your circlejerk on the strat, it's fine.
Okay, I admit I do fucking hate everything.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
I like the 2&4 positions on a Strat... ya don't really get those sounds anywhere else.
I really quite like the way my G&L Legacy plays, and the sounds it gives. It's 2 point trem works far better than any 6-point I've used. I find it, and other Strats, looks kinda uninteresting, but it is definitely a player.
I really quite like the way my G&L Legacy plays, and the sounds it gives. It's 2 point trem works far better than any 6-point I've used. I find it, and other Strats, looks kinda uninteresting, but it is definitely a player.
Donate to Ankhanu Pressekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.