goddamn it I guess just like strats

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by JJLipton »

I played an original 65 strat the other day. It was quite awesome.
User avatar
BillClay
.
.
Posts: 1421
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:05 pm

Post by BillClay »

iCEByTes wrote:my dream is this
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars/ ... ric-guitar
Olympic pearl Rosewood
Image

+

FiberCarbon Pickguard , true fibercarbon
Image

+

Curtis Novak lipticks 3x
Image

+

CTS 250k Pots and Metal knobs barrel i think
Image

+

Schaller strapslock


will looks bestial :D
Your dream looks p tight.
User avatar
westtexasred
Shortscale Cultural Minister
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by westtexasred »

JJLipton wrote:I played an original 65 strat the other day. It was quite awesome.
Was it like this one?

Image
User avatar
61fury
.
.
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:53 pm
Location: Knoxville, TN

What did they look like in 1954?

Post by 61fury »

I used to think they were boring, especially the black/ white PG variety. But in the right colors they look great. Then I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special. Sure they and their knock offs are common as dirt but get one in the right combination and they still look like they're from the future. I've really come around to them.
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Re: What did they look like in 1954?

Post by paul_ »

61fury wrote: I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special.
This. It looked like a spaceship, and the body and trem design are two of the most historically noteworthy innovations in electric guitar design ever, they've just become so ubiquitous that we're used to them now. Forget about the Jazzmaster or Mustang having turned out like they did if not for the Strat. Page, Beck, Harrison, Knopfler etc all talked about seeing them in shops as kids and getting goosebumps like they were looking at a Ferrari or something. A TV press guy writing a review of Buddy Holly on Ed Sullivan didn't even realize it was a guitar, he was writing about the weird sound of Holly's futuristic electronic banjo driving his band.

Remember that when the Strat came out the only solidbody electrics similarly fancy to them in the shops were butterscotch/blackguard Teles and Goldtop P90 Les Pauls. The Strat had way more going on, it changed the whole game.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022402
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Re: What did they look like in 1954?

Post by dots »

paul_ wrote:
61fury wrote: I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special.
This. It looked like a spaceship, and the body and trem design are two of the most historically noteworthy innovations in electric guitar design ever, they've just become so ubiquitous that we're used to them now. Forget about the Jazzmaster or Mustang having turned out like they did if not for the Strat. Page, Beck, Harrison, Knopfler etc all talked about seeing them in shops as kids and getting goosebumps like they were looking at a Ferrari or something. A TV press guy writing a review of Buddy Holly on Ed Sullivan didn't even realize it was a guitar, he was writing about the weird sound of Holly's futuristic electronic banjo driving his band.

Remember that when the Strat came out the only solidbody electrics similarly fancy to them in the shops were butterscotch/blackguard Teles and Goldtop P90 Les Pauls. The Strat had way more going on, it changed the whole game.
love this. strats get some hate around here, and i have always felt it undeserved. this post says it all.
User avatar
ultratwin
The 25.5" subversion
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:47 pm
Location: Seoul

Post by ultratwin »

Aye, great stuff to think about there, paul_.


izodiak wrote:Ultratwin You know how to post nice stratocasters ! Really good looking both of them !
Aren't they charming? I wish that two-pickuper was mine!

The collage of my ST68-TX was done using good ol' Comic Life, which I usually use just to make Shortscale banners.
JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by JJLipton »

westtexasred wrote:
JJLipton wrote:I played an original 65 strat the other day. It was quite awesome.
Was it like this one?

Image
Indeed it was sir. The small frets made bending very difficult but the sound was AWESOME through the fender amp.
User avatar
ultratwin
The 25.5" subversion
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:47 pm
Location: Seoul

Post by ultratwin »

When I was first asked to play in Lee Seunghwan's band, my two friends on guitar had a 3TS '63 and a '64 respectively. One of them, originally purchased for $16000, just got sold for $25000.


2005 Backstage ULTRALOLZ.

I believe this one was the '64, it was kinda unnerving just holding the thing.

► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Good post paul.
It is truly iconic and the design still looks fresh and futuristic today.

I remember reading somewhere that Strat sales were floundering in the 60's until Hendrix arrived. The rest is history.
User avatar
brainfur
.
.
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:40 pm
Location: United States

Post by brainfur »

Fran wrote:Good post paul.
It is truly iconic and the design still looks fresh and futuristic today.

I remember reading somewhere that Strat sales were floundering in the 60's until Hendrix arrived. The rest is history.
i watched the woodstock documentary this last weekend and it ended w jimmy hendrix playing and the cameraman focused in on his face and cropped out his hands and guitar! what the hell man???
George wrote:in the future there must be only guitars or only computers
theshadowofseattle wrote:TYPICAL AMERICAN BAND LIKE JAY Z, AXE BODY SPRAY, AND THE VENTURES.
Image
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

ultratwin wrote:the '64
[pics]
That's lovely. I never tire of seeing a properly old-school Strat re-shaped/coloured by years of use and exposure to the elements... I know what you mean by "unnerving" though, it always strikes me how pre-CBS Fenders are almost invariably all beat-up and we know they're rugged, yet I handle them more carefully than I would an antique vase or something.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
Mo Law-ka
strictly roots
Posts: 3105
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: a series of tubes

Post by Mo Law-ka »

Paul_, I'd venture to guess that stems from them costing more than an antique vase.
jcyphe wrote: Mo is the most sensible person in this thread.
icey wrote:and thats for the hatters (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

it fetched that much?!?!?! the one your holding? it looks like it had a refret. that is craziness. i rmember the first time going to hollywood guitar center an playing a 99,000.00 59 lp goldtop and there was an early 60s strat for around 25,000.00 or so but i didn't touch it.
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Re: What did they look like in 1954?

Post by benecol »

paul_ wrote:
61fury wrote: I think about how it must have looked in 1954, like Back to the Future, what else looked like that? That view from the forearm cut , belly cut side makes it look like it's melting, the whole body shape is really special.
This. It looked like a spaceship, and the body and trem design are two of the most historically noteworthy innovations in electric guitar design ever, they've just become so ubiquitous that we're used to them now. Forget about the Jazzmaster or Mustang having turned out like they did if not for the Strat. Page, Beck, Harrison, Knopfler etc all talked about seeing them in shops as kids and getting goosebumps like they were looking at a Ferrari or something. A TV press guy writing a review of Buddy Holly on Ed Sullivan didn't even realize it was a guitar, he was writing about the weird sound of Holly's futuristic electronic banjo driving his band.

Remember that when the Strat came out the only solidbody electrics similarly fancy to them in the shops were butterscotch/blackguard Teles and Goldtop P90 Les Pauls. The Strat had way more going on, it changed the whole game.
Aye, very good points both. Can't think what else could be done to make a strat any more visually appealing - it's about perfect. It's only its ubiquity that makes some guitarists love them less.

Paul - do yoy have a link to that Buddy Holly factlet? I love that...
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Re: What did they look like in 1954?

Post by Pens »

benecol wrote: Aye, very good points both. Can't think what else could be done to make a strat any more visually appealing - it's about perfect. It's only its ubiquity that makes some guitarists love them less.
Eh, no. I don't like them, hate the contours, hate the bridge entirely in both looks and function and the amount of routing it requires, hate the placement of the controls, hate the sound, hate the three pickups, hate the switching, hate the scale, hate the tuners. There's almost nothing I like about strats at all and it's not how common they are.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

You hate everything, you fucking curmudgeon.
User avatar
brainfur
.
.
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:40 pm
Location: United States

Post by brainfur »

Pens hate strat so much that it sounds like he *envies* them...
George wrote:in the future there must be only guitars or only computers
theshadowofseattle wrote:TYPICAL AMERICAN BAND LIKE JAY Z, AXE BODY SPRAY, AND THE VENTURES.
Image
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

I like my Musicmaster. It has none of the problems the strat has.

My point is only to say that it's not envy or ubiquity of the Strat that makes some people dislike them. Some just actually hate the stupid things. Y'all can go back to your circlejerk on the strat, it's fine.









Okay, I admit I do fucking hate everything.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

I like the 2&4 positions on a Strat... ya don't really get those sounds anywhere else.

I really quite like the way my G&L Legacy plays, and the sounds it gives. It's 2 point trem works far better than any 6-point I've used. I find it, and other Strats, looks kinda uninteresting, but it is definitely a player.
ekwatts wrote:That's American cinema, that is. Fucking sparkles.
Donate to Ankhanu Press