Check out my 1964 Mustang!

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

RonnieHornschuh
.
.
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:34 pm
Location: Vienna

Check out my 1964 Mustang!

Post by RonnieHornschuh »

Got this beauty for only 790 Euros yesterday. A bit banged up, but all parts are original. No whammy bar though...
Sounds great, the neck on the lower frets is really thin though, it plays like a children's guitar...

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
MattK
.
.
Posts: 1080
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:06 am
Location: Hobart, Australia

Re: Check out my 1964 Mustang!

Post by MattK »

RonnieHornschuh wrote:... the neck on the lower frets is really thin though, it plays like a children's guitar...
Weird - I would have guessed that as a Duo-Sonic neck, and it has no MUSTANG on the decal. Does it have an 8 on the heel stamp?
RonnieHornschuh
.
.
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:34 pm
Location: Vienna

Post by RonnieHornschuh »

From what I've read the 64 Mustangs put the decal for the logo on top of the lacquer. That's why it went off. You can see a tiny black dot where the M used to be. Neck stamp says Okt. 1964 B, not sure about the heel stamp. I don't wanna unscrew it again...
User avatar
MattK
.
.
Posts: 1080
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:06 am
Location: Hobart, Australia

Post by MattK »

Aha, that's a much more likely explanation than some mystery Duo-Sonic neck becoming attached to it!
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

it's definitely not a duo-sonic II neck, looking at the decal. here's my '64:

Image

however, i've never seen or heard of a 1964 mustang with a B width neck, only As.
Image
User avatar
BobArsecake
a mannequin made by madmen
Posts: 10957
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)

Post by BobArsecake »

That is lovely.
User avatar
Thomas
.
.
Posts: 3591
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Glasgow, UK

Post by Thomas »

The numbers under the decal for a 64 should be:

Headstock numbers (early '64): DES. 186,826 PAT. 2,960,900 2,741,146 & PAT. PEND.
Headstock numbers (late '64): DES. 186,826 PAT. 2,960,900 2,741,146 3,143,028 & PAT. PEND.
RonnieHornschuh
.
.
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:34 pm
Location: Vienna

Post by RonnieHornschuh »

Yes, they match. You can't really see the numbers on the posted pictures.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Is that an A width or B width??
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

A nice piece of history you got there. Congrats! :D
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

here's my 64 A neck.

Image

Image
RonnieHornschuh
.
.
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:34 pm
Location: Vienna

Post by RonnieHornschuh »

Wow, that looks even tinier than mine. Love the colour too.