Are Mustang pickups meant to be so weak?
Moderated By: mods
- StevePirates
- .
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:00 am
- Location: Reno
-
- .
- Posts: 1401
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am
If you want new pickups i recommend these:
http://www.dimarzio.com/pickups/strat/h ... ling-strat
Air norton s
Dimarzio bc1
Dimarzio bc 2
The chopper have tried these can recommend them all.
Some say that fast track is good.
And of course you have super distortion to.
http://www.dimarzio.com/pickups/strat/h ... ling-strat
Air norton s
Dimarzio bc1
Dimarzio bc 2
The chopper have tried these can recommend them all.
Some say that fast track is good.
And of course you have super distortion to.
- Phil O'Keefe
- .
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:50 am
- Location: Riverside CA USA
That's fairly typical. Most of the ones I've measured have been in the 5.5 - 6.5k range. I don't think I've ever seen a stock Mustang pup that hit 7k, and never anything lower than 5k. If it's in the 2-3k range, something's not right...taylornutt wrote:I think they should have an output in the 5 -6K range.
i think that'll be a little tricky as the strat sounds are really down to the pickup positions and bridgejbgron wrote:I want to have similar output levels to a strat but without sounding exactly like a strat. I want them to look like Mustang pickups too. The Fralins are the front runners at the moment. Money is not really an issue.
however, that said i think pitching a bit higher in output would help compensate as mustangs don't have as much low end oomph compared to a strat. maybe 8-9k in the bridge, 6-7k in the neck. it may also be worth considering whether you want alnico 2, 3 or 5.
i'd also opt for staggered pole pieces and ditch the covers to get better string separation and response too (in my opinion) but that's not really a big deal, plus you want the pickup covers so you'll have to go for flat pole pieces or be prepared to hammer them down