My collection - Updated - that's the lot

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

love this

Image
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

Freddy V-C wrote:These are all lovely looking!

Other than the brown one, which you've mentioned is in standard, what tunings do you use?
The 64 is in D#D#A#D#GG, the VM is in EGDGED, the JMJM is in CGDGBB. I've also got a Tele in CGCCCG and a Jag in EG#EG#EG#. I've tried a couple of other tunings but they haven't stuck.
Noisy Cat wrote:Judging by the wider string spacing, it looks like the sunburst Squier VMJM has an American tailpiece – yet a standard non-locking Squier trem plate...
The Staytrem bridge is narrower than the standard bridge string spacing (55mm v 52mm) so it may be that it makes the trem look less narrow.
finboy wrote:Great collection, curious on your opinion of mastery vs staytrem
I've been using the Staytrems for longer - the brown JM had one until I got the Mastery last week.

But so far, the Staytrems are way easier to set up, both bridges get rid of the majority of the standard style bridges foibles. The Mastery is better for behind the bridge stuff - it is clearer, and the Mastery seems to transfer more string vibration to the body. I probably like the Mastery a little better, but the Staytrem is nearly as good for half the price.

FWIW the only standard offset bridge I've used that has been any good at all is the vintage on on the 64.
User avatar
Noisy Cat
.
.
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:55 pm
Location: East London

Post by Noisy Cat »

NickD wrote:
Noisy Cat wrote:Judging by the wider string spacing, it looks like the sunburst Squier VMJM has an American tailpiece – yet a standard non-locking Squier trem plate...
The Staytrem bridge is narrower than the standard bridge string spacing (55mm v 52mm) so it may be that it makes the trem look less narrow.
No, nothing to do with the spacing at the bridge (I too have a VMJM with a Staytrem bridge). Look at the outer E-strings in relation to the screws just above the tailpiece.

USA spacing:
Image

CIJ spacing (and Squiers have the same – look at your JMJM for example):
Image

Just an observation!
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

Noisy Cat wrote:
NickD wrote:
Noisy Cat wrote:Judging by the wider string spacing, it looks like the sunburst Squier VMJM has an American tailpiece – yet a standard non-locking Squier trem plate...
The Staytrem bridge is narrower than the standard bridge string spacing (55mm v 52mm) so it may be that it makes the trem look less narrow.
No, nothing to do with the spacing at the bridge (I too have a VMJM with a Staytrem bridge). Look at the outer E-strings in relation to the screws just above the tailpiece.

USA spacing:

CIJ spacing (and Squiers have the same – look at your JMJM for example):

Just an observation!
With that in mind, I just checked - the JMJM, the trem on the brown JM (from a VM Squier) and the CIJ trem on my Jag are all about 52mm, the 64, VMJM and my Squier Bass VI are all 55mm. The two Squiers were bought at the same time.

Not sure what that means though.
User avatar
JohnnyTheBoy
.
.
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Middle England
Contact:

Post by JohnnyTheBoy »

Cracking collection Nick!...and perfect perfect colour choices...the vintage has my win...and yeh hows the Staytrem/Mastery debate? Very tempted for a staytrem for the vm mustang i got...have even thought about making my own..a kind of bastard of all styles :twisted:
Image
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

Added 6 more - some Gibson style stuff mainly.
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

I was dreading you doing these... That white one especially was the bollocks. Have since decided, though, that I only like P90s when they're pickguard mounted. They're just too hairy-chested for me when they're body mounted.
User avatar
sunshiner
.
.
Posts: 8299
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:05 pm
Location: Around the corner

Post by sunshiner »

That Tokai is super beautiful
matte30is wrote:Someone man up and get a balloon.
User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

Post by Concretebadger »

I'm so glad the old Ibanez found a good home. She looks like she's been in the wars but the playability's superb, and the pickups are hotter than YOUR MUM.

And yeah...that Tokai is really damned nice. Another one of those under-appreciated MIJ brands that make some really nice stuff.
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

I think even at the £500 they go for in perfect condition the Ibanez Artists are cheap, I've played Gibsons of that era and they were no better I want to fill in the missing piece of maple, but that will mean refinishing the top. If I go ahead it will become a goldtop.

Tim - they are both in a good home, neither are going anywhere. The Tokai especially gets a lot of play, probably the second most used after the brown JM.
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

Love that artist yoke.
Image
User avatar
jculpjr
.
.
Posts: 561
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:58 pm

Post by jculpjr »

Curious how you are getting along with the SG? The vintage versions are out of my price range and I've heard some of the recent versions were crap. I'd love to get one- any recommendations on year for a solid player under $800?
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

The SG is great, I like big necks on my 24.75 scale guitars, and it is fairly chunky, and build quality is good. I'm not sure what year mine is, mid 2000s I think. I've had other SGs before, but never quite gelled with them - I'd definitely try a special out, and they are good value as well.
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

I got a 2005 faded special recently and it's great, impeccable fretjob and nice rosewood. They didn't get crap until Gibson started selling them for even cheaper in like 2008-ish. If you want an even safer bet, the pre-2002 Fadeds with crescent moon inlays and ebony boards are invariably swiggity if they aren't beat up (though I never actually liked those inlays).
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
94CIJMustang
.
.
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:24 am
Location: Alabama....

Post by 94CIJMustang »

Awesome collection man.

I've been really wanting a Jazzmaster lately and I'm trying to decide between a J Mascis Signature or a Squier VM.

Which do you guys prefer?

and how are the pickups in each?
finboy
.
.
Posts: 3564
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:56 am
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by finboy »

I've got that same epi les paul! I can't bring myself to sell it as it was the first real guitar I bought myself when I got back into guitars after highschool. It is NOT light, but I found out it has a maple cap with maple veneer overtop, I thought it was photoflame based on the price point but apparently not.
User avatar
Josh
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 5010
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: George
Contact:

Post by Josh »

94CIJMustang wrote:Awesome collection man.

I've been really wanting a Jazzmaster lately and I'm trying to decide between a J Mascis Signature or a Squier VM.

Which do you guys prefer?

and how are the pickups in each?
the j mascis jazzmaster is nice because the neck is smooth satin, but the trem is moved up like the CP jazzmasters, so in terms of play it'll feel like those, pickups were pretty good.

i bought a sonic blue VM jazzmaster and i love it to bits, amazing guitar, pickups are awesome in it too. traditional tremolo placement too if that's important to you. (that's what sold me on it, i own a CP jaguar and the trem placement just doesn't feel right)
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

I have a VM Jazzmaster and my former bandmate has a J Mascis. I've played the Mascis a bit at rehearsal and in guitar shops.

I really love the Mascis and wish I owned one. Will probably buy one within the next year. Satin neck feels great. Has medium jumbo frets, if you like those. Pickups are a bit darker than those on the VM in my opinion. They have more emphasis on the midrange. Somewhat similar to a P90. I think they sound terrific. Also, the TOM bridge is nice and makes the guitar very stable.

That said, I like my VM quite a bit and won't be parting with it. The pickups do have that traditional JM feel. They are bright and chimey like they should be. They are a tad shrill but can be tamed with some EQ adjustment. I got rid of the stock bridge and added a Staytrem. Huge improvement! The neck is fairly slim whereas the Mascis neck is a bit more chunky.

I hate to say it as a proud VM owner, but you'll probably be more happy with the Mascis "out of the box." That being said, the VM is a great guitar and a more traditional Jazzmaster. If you like playing Jazzmasters, you may want both. I sure do.
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

Sorry for thread-jack; please continue with Gibson style lurve!
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

Loads more added to the first post. That's the lot (for the moment!)