Pre-1969 vs. Reissue Mustangs: differences?

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

Doug
.
.
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia and Cashiers, North Carolina

Pre-1969 vs. Reissue Mustangs: differences?

Post by Doug »

For those who have pre-1969 Mustangs, what are the differences between yours and the reissue Mustangs?
Doug
User avatar
Rox
.
.
Posts: 1283
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:41 am

Post by Rox »

To be honest? A ton. Especially weight. Necks they say are about the same but if you play one you'll disagree. I prefer a 69RI over an original but that is just preference. Poplar vs Basswood is another.
User avatar
Fakir Mustache
.
.
Posts: 4362
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm

Post by Fakir Mustache »

I'm not even sure the Squiers can be considered re-issues: thicker necks, thicker frets, heavier body, pickups sound different and so do the guitars unplugged. I do think the Squiers play nice though.

I can't say anything about Japanese re-issues, never played one.
NickD wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 11:44 pm
plopswagon wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:05 pm Fuck! My car runs on Tubes!
When you press the accelerator past halfway it doesn’t actually go any faster, but the engine noise distorts
User avatar
HNB
.
.
Posts: 4089
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:32 pm
Location: Puyallup, WA

Post by HNB »

Also the body thickness is different with vintage vs reissue. The bridges are a little different, the pickguards are a bit different (reissue bridge pickups are physically closer to the bridge than vintage), the contours are slightly different..

They are similar in many ways, but there are differences. Oh and vintage logos are normally smaller than the reissues.
J0K1
.
.
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 2:07 pm

Post by J0K1 »

Everything is different, you should try them both!
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

Squier has 9.5" fretboard radius and jumbo fret wire. Pre-69 is 7.25" radius and small vintage fret wire. Pre-69 pickups were hand wound vs machine wound.
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
Doug
.
.
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia and Cashiers, North Carolina

Vintage, Reissue, two different guitars

Post by Doug »

speedfish wrote:Squier has 9.5" fretboard radius and jumbo fret wire. Pre-69 is 7.25" radius and small vintage fret wire. Pre-69 pickups were hand wound vs machine wound.
Thanks, everyone. I've not had a chance to do a point-by-point comparison and this helps. I played a Reissue Mustang and yeah, it felt different. But did not have my '65 with me for direct comparison.

Some have claimed the original Mustang pups are "weak" but I'm happy with mine. I always play with the guitar volume dimed to get the most out of my pups and I'm sure that helps. An amp is such a big part of the sound, I don't notice any weakness.

The neck is thinner and the fret spacing up near the body gets a bit tight, so it takes some playing for my fingers to adjust after playing a BluesHawk or Les Paul. But I have medium-sized hands and it's no big deal to adjust.

The original and the Reissue...really two different guitars.

Cheers,
Doug
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

WHAT THE FUCK IS A PRE-69 REISSUE ?
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
Rox
.
.
Posts: 1283
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:41 am

Post by Rox »

robroe wrote:WHAT THE FUCK IS A PRE-69 REISSUE ?

Maybe a 65RI? :?
User avatar
serfx
ss.o bastard son
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:34 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Contact:

Post by serfx »

would be a 65RI


having owned several of both, i've found that i just don't get along with the re-issues, usually due to the medium jumbo frets (or the squire 9.5r)
that japanese 69ri's are good, pups sound thinner then on my og 69 & 72, but feel about the same, i find the og models weigh less.

there is a dude on the forum that hand winds mustang pups, i used them in my `72 build and they sound spot on with my 65 & 69.

(i've sold off all the reissues i've bought over the years)
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022402
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

i wish i kept my RI comp stang. they're harder to find on the 'bay these days.
Doug
.
.
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia and Cashiers, North Carolina

The frets

Post by Doug »

serfx wrote:...having owned several of both, i've found that i just don't get along with the re-issues, usually due to the medium jumbo frets (or the squire 9.5r)
that japanese 69ri's are good, pups sound thinner then on my og 69 & 72, but feel about the same, i find the og models weigh less...(i've sold off all the reissues i've bought over the years)
You're reminding me, the 1960s frets are lower and thinner. I'm used to that. I know bigger frets can make bending a bit easier, but because my action's pretty low, I can bend strings just fine.
Doug
Doug
.
.
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia and Cashiers, North Carolina

For those who have pre-1969 Mustangs, what are the differenc

Post by Doug »

Rox wrote:
robroe wrote:WHAT THE FUCK IS A PRE-69 REISSUE ?

Maybe a 65RI? :?
We're comparing the original 1960s Mustangs with the reissue Mustangs.
Doug
User avatar
serfx
ss.o bastard son
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:34 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Contact:

Re: For those who have pre-1969 Mustangs, what are the diffe

Post by serfx »

Doug wrote:
Rox wrote:
robroe wrote:WHAT THE FUCK IS A PRE-69 REISSUE ?

Maybe a 65RI? :?
We're comparing the original 1960s Mustangs with the reissue Mustangs.
ie: Fender 64-68 vs 65RI
69-73 comp vs ri comp
74+ vs whatever else & the squier models.

least thats my take on the topic.
Doug
.
.
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia and Cashiers, North Carolina

Re: For those who have pre-1969 Mustangs, what are the diffe

Post by Doug »

serfx wrote:
Doug wrote:
Rox wrote:
Maybe a 65RI? :?
We're comparing the original 1960s Mustangs with the reissue Mustangs.
ie: Fender 64-68 vs 65RI
69-73 comp vs ri comp
74+ vs whatever else & the squier models.

least thats my take on the topic.
Yeah, that nails it, Serfx. Though I was focusing in on 64-68 vs the 65 Reissue. Because mine is a 1965 and I'm just learning that there are some significant differences with the 65 Reissue.
Doug
User avatar
Fakir Mustache
.
.
Posts: 4362
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm

Post by Fakir Mustache »

There's also a 66RI and some other ones like Factory Special Run, one of which had a bent arm vibrato when the other ones used the straight one and came in Cobalt Blue I think, they called the arm something like "vintage corksniffer" although those weren't the exact words that came up when using the translator. Unfortunately, I do not know any more about them and actual differences.
NickD wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 11:44 pm
plopswagon wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:05 pm Fuck! My car runs on Tubes!
When you press the accelerator past halfway it doesn’t actually go any faster, but the engine noise distorts
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

What about finish? Is the 65RI poly or nitro?
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
User avatar
gusman2x
.
.
Posts: 4198
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: Manchester U.K.

Post by gusman2x »

Pretty sure all the reissues from Japan (which is the vast majority) are Poly.

There was a USA CS vintage reissue made specifically for Namm, and I'm sure they were Nitro.

In fact, here's the US Custom Shop one MEGA $$$ - JUST BUY AN ORIGINAL AND STILL HAVE CHANGE FOR A HOLIDAY
User avatar
Rox
.
.
Posts: 1283
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:41 am

Post by Rox »

3000 Euros for a Stang? :?

You can go custom built for less..
weeping_moon
.
.
Posts: 1401
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:44 am

Post by weeping_moon »

Rox wrote:3000 Euros for a Stang? :?

You can go custom built for less..
yeah lets talk about overpriced.

you could get a vintage one for less?

and white pickup covers on pearl pickguard?

if i would buy anything at that price (i wouldnt), everything has to be perfect.

can anyone tell me whats so special about these stangs? except they were only one made in each color?