Never owned a Jazzmaster...
Moderated By: mods
Never owned a Jazzmaster...
Am planning on buying one as my 'second' guitar for some wobbly trem action (and some hipster pointage) the contenders are Squier VM , Squier J Mascis, fender modern player (red with the rosewood fretboard). Which one would you guys choose from those 3?
XY
absolutely love my vm jazzy. have tried the j mascis and classic player and the trem placement really sells the vm for me. you could always swap the pups or bridge if they're not to your taste, but I've kept mine stock and it probably gets played the most outve all my guitars.
tl;dr: vm jazzy is incredible bang for buck, I love mine, and DAT SONIC BLUE.
tl;dr: vm jazzy is incredible bang for buck, I love mine, and DAT SONIC BLUE.
VM are great bang for your buck but if I were to buy another Jazzmaster I'd probably pay the extra hundred or two and buy a second hand Japanese one. I kept the VM Jazzy I had for a couple of weeks. Having played my Japanese and vintage ones the VM was lacking in comparison. Great VFM but not a patch on the Japanese one.
Plus by the time you swap out the parts you don't like on the VM you'd have been better off just buying the Fender in the first place.
Also classic player is better quality-wise than the VM. Plus you can usually get them for less than a Japanese one. If you'd prefer the vintage look with modern radius etc then the Classic player has the perfect mix. Anyone who thinks the VM is as good is either:
a) Dreaming
or
b) Hasn't played the Fender versions
In all fairness tho any secondhand VM guitar is a no brainer. They're a helluva guitar for £100ish. As for the JM JM I've never owned one of them.
Plus by the time you swap out the parts you don't like on the VM you'd have been better off just buying the Fender in the first place.
Also classic player is better quality-wise than the VM. Plus you can usually get them for less than a Japanese one. If you'd prefer the vintage look with modern radius etc then the Classic player has the perfect mix. Anyone who thinks the VM is as good is either:
a) Dreaming
or
b) Hasn't played the Fender versions
In all fairness tho any secondhand VM guitar is a no brainer. They're a helluva guitar for £100ish. As for the JM JM I've never owned one of them.
^ MODERN player, not classic player. Two different series.
Classic is MIM, pretty decent Fender quality.
Modern Players IIRC are more or less Squier CV's, and priced accordingly. Not that it's a bad thing in terms of quality, just a bit Paul1k of them.
In terms of these three I'd say it should be an easy decision because of how different they all are. Fender has humbuckers, the Mascis has a TOM style tailpiece, and the VM is closest to vintage spec as you're gonna get at that price but it'd probably be worth at least upgrading the bridge. Also the QC on those based on the varied reviews would have me wanting to try one in person if I could.
Classic is MIM, pretty decent Fender quality.
Modern Players IIRC are more or less Squier CV's, and priced accordingly. Not that it's a bad thing in terms of quality, just a bit Paul1k of them.
In terms of these three I'd say it should be an easy decision because of how different they all are. Fender has humbuckers, the Mascis has a TOM style tailpiece, and the VM is closest to vintage spec as you're gonna get at that price but it'd probably be worth at least upgrading the bridge. Also the QC on those based on the varied reviews would have me wanting to try one in person if I could.
VM JM is a solid choice on the whole. I've owned one for a few years. It has its plusses and minuses.
I like the JMJM a bit better, but you have to be OK with a chunkier neck, jumbo frets, P90ish pickups, TOM, and revised trem placement. If I could do it over again, I prolly would have gone for the Mascis.
I don't have enough experience with MIJ guitars, but if you were to snag one of these, you'd prolly need a pup swap.
I like the JMJM a bit better, but you have to be OK with a chunkier neck, jumbo frets, P90ish pickups, TOM, and revised trem placement. If I could do it over again, I prolly would have gone for the Mascis.
I don't have enough experience with MIJ guitars, but if you were to snag one of these, you'd prolly need a pup swap.
JMJM all the way. Amazing guitars for the price. Great value for money. I have an old JM & this was an amazing alternative. Great sound, lovely neck & sweet look.
plopswagon wrote:I like teles and strats because they're made out of guitar.
robroe wrote:I dont need a capo. I have the other chords in my tonefingers
I own the JMJM and agree it's the best player. However, if you're in it for the trem, then I think you'd be better off with a s/h Japanese model. Reason being is that the JMJM has the TOM, so you would at least need the roller bridge replacement. Plus the pups are pretty hot on the JMJM, but I guess they're shit on a MIJ.
One thing I can say, the neck on the JMJM is AMAZING.
One thing I can say, the neck on the JMJM is AMAZING.
The JMJM has the appointments, it's probably the best quality bang for the buck, and I'm convinced the included TOM-like bridge & 9/5" fretboard radius is a good plus for Virgin Jazzers like yourself.
The standard VM Jazz felt weird to me and the tone seemed strangely "loose" compared to my CIJs, but I'm still keeping the body for a baritone project #maybe
The standard VM Jazz felt weird to me and the tone seemed strangely "loose" compared to my CIJs, but I'm still keeping the body for a baritone project #maybe