Never owned a Jazzmaster...

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Never owned a Jazzmaster...

Post by dezb1 »

Am planning on buying one as my 'second' guitar for some wobbly trem action (and some hipster pointage) the contenders are Squier VM , Squier J Mascis, fender modern player (red with the rosewood fretboard). Which one would you guys choose from those 3?
XY
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

Sorry, sheer ubiquity means you no longer get free hipster points with each Jazzmaster sold :D

Sadly not tried these ones, just the AVRI and Japanese reissues.
User avatar
Josh
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 5010
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: George
Contact:

Post by Josh »

absolutely love my vm jazzy. have tried the j mascis and classic player and the trem placement really sells the vm for me. you could always swap the pups or bridge if they're not to your taste, but I've kept mine stock and it probably gets played the most outve all my guitars.

tl;dr: vm jazzy is incredible bang for buck, I love mine, and DAT SONIC BLUE.
User avatar
Rox
.
.
Posts: 1283
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:41 am

Post by Rox »

If those are the options out of those the JMJM is the best of them. Epecially for the money. The Modern player is ok but it's all hype to a J Mascis. Hell, for a Squier it plays as good if not better than a Classic Player Jazzmaster. See for yourself.
User avatar
Thomas
.
.
Posts: 3591
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Glasgow, UK

Post by Thomas »

VM are great bang for your buck but if I were to buy another Jazzmaster I'd probably pay the extra hundred or two and buy a second hand Japanese one. I kept the VM Jazzy I had for a couple of weeks. Having played my Japanese and vintage ones the VM was lacking in comparison. Great VFM but not a patch on the Japanese one.

Plus by the time you swap out the parts you don't like on the VM you'd have been better off just buying the Fender in the first place.

Also classic player is better quality-wise than the VM. Plus you can usually get them for less than a Japanese one. If you'd prefer the vintage look with modern radius etc then the Classic player has the perfect mix. Anyone who thinks the VM is as good is either:

a) Dreaming

or

b) Hasn't played the Fender versions

In all fairness tho any secondhand VM guitar is a no brainer. They're a helluva guitar for £100ish. As for the JM JM I've never owned one of them.
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

^ MODERN player, not classic player. Two different series.

Classic is MIM, pretty decent Fender quality.

Modern Players IIRC are more or less Squier CV's, and priced accordingly. Not that it's a bad thing in terms of quality, just a bit Paul1k of them.

In terms of these three I'd say it should be an easy decision because of how different they all are. Fender has humbuckers, the Mascis has a TOM style tailpiece, and the VM is closest to vintage spec as you're gonna get at that price but it'd probably be worth at least upgrading the bridge. Also the QC on those based on the varied reviews would have me wanting to try one in person if I could.
User avatar
speedfish
.
.
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:08 am

Post by speedfish »

I love my JMJM. Outstanding quality and sound for the money, but if you want
hipster cred then probably should go with the VM.
Disciple of Pain

"I'm like the monkey screwing the skunk. I haven't had enough, but I've about had all that I can stand!"

"Born to Lose. Live to Win." Lemmy Kilmister
User avatar
Rox
.
.
Posts: 1283
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:41 am

Post by Rox »

speedfish wrote:but if you want
hipster cred then probably should go with the VM.
:lol:
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post by dezb1 »

Rox wrote:
speedfish wrote:but if you want
hipster cred then probably should go with the VM.
:lol:

This is my priority, other wise I'd just stick with ma Strat.
XY
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

loved the Squier JMJM I tried recently. Great bridge and the pickups were hot and full of jangle.

Kevin Shields told a guy at work if he wanted a Jazzmaster that was the best way to go.

Do an JMJM, ffs.
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

VM JM is a solid choice on the whole. I've owned one for a few years. It has its plusses and minuses.

I like the JMJM a bit better, but you have to be OK with a chunkier neck, jumbo frets, P90ish pickups, TOM, and revised trem placement. If I could do it over again, I prolly would have gone for the Mascis.

I don't have enough experience with MIJ guitars, but if you were to snag one of these, you'd prolly need a pup swap.
User avatar
lorez
.
.
Posts: 9689
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Hopelessly Wayward

Post by lorez »

JMJM all the way. Amazing guitars for the price. Great value for money. I have an old JM & this was an amazing alternative. Great sound, lovely neck & sweet look.
plopswagon wrote:I like teles and strats because they're made out of guitar.
robroe wrote:I dont need a capo. I have the other chords in my tonefingers
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

Another vote for the JMJM here, the best player out of your choices.
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

Yarp, not heard one bad thing about the Squier Mascis.
User avatar
gusman2x
.
.
Posts: 4198
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: Manchester U.K.

Post by gusman2x »

I own the JMJM and agree it's the best player. However, if you're in it for the trem, then I think you'd be better off with a s/h Japanese model. Reason being is that the JMJM has the TOM, so you would at least need the roller bridge replacement. Plus the pups are pretty hot on the JMJM, but I guess they're shit on a MIJ.

One thing I can say, the neck on the JMJM is AMAZING.
User avatar
ultratwin
The 25.5" subversion
Posts: 6731
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:47 pm
Location: Seoul

Post by ultratwin »

The JMJM has the appointments, it's probably the best quality bang for the buck, and I'm convinced the included TOM-like bridge & 9/5" fretboard radius is a good plus for Virgin Jazzers like yourself.

The standard VM Jazz felt weird to me and the tone seemed strangely "loose" compared to my CIJs, but I'm still keeping the body for a baritone project #maybe
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

my mate is selling a CAR matching headstock 2007 CIJ for £250 atm on facebook lmao. i pm'd him to get him to raise the price and everything

apparently there's a few scratches but really it looks in vgc

i might buy it, see how i get on, then set it free within the shortscale family
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

You should, that's a hell of a price.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

which irks me a bit (the low price), but he wouldn't have any of it. i think he wants rid because in his head it's awful, likely because he doesn't have much setup experience and didn't learn the idiosyncrasies. i've messaged him now.

edit: drat, it's gone. oh well, wasn't that bothered tbh.
User avatar
jagsonic
.
.
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:57 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by jagsonic »

Really love my JMJM 8)