24 neck pref. squier, all parts etc

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
broomhandle
.
.
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:42 pm

24 neck pref. squier, all parts etc

Post by broomhandle »

I'm looking to get a neck for a mustang. Im on a budget...

I have been looking at a new:

Squier mustang neck vs a all parts jag neck.

Any thoughts? The Squier is ready to go...

I have never used either necks. I like a lot of Squier necks I have...,
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

The Squier Mustang neck is particularly chunky. It does not really feel like other Mustang necks (Japanese, Vintage, Pawn Shop).

I would probably get a Squier Jaguar neck on eBay. They are less than $100.
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

If an Ibanez Wizard is a 1 on a 10-point chunkiness scale and a 50s Tele is a 10 and a Standard Strat is a 5, then:

Fender HH Jaguar Special - 6.5
Fender Kurt Cobain Mustang - 5.5
Squier Mustang - 5
'65 RI - 4
'69/'73 RI (my fave) - 3.5

I don't know where the All Parts JGRO fits in that scale because I've never tried it. That said, I think the Squier Mustang neck is very nice. It feels more like a Strat neck than a Mustang neck in terms of dimension (b/c thickness and radius), but that's not necessarily a bad thing. You will be able to do whole step bends on the high E string, which is always a bit of a challenge on a 7.25" radius Mustang neck. You just have to make sure and get a 9.5" or adjustable radius bridge... which does matter.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

Was this
honeyiscool wrote:You just have to make sure and get a 9.5" or adjustable radius bridge... which does matter.
In response to this? :lol:
singlepup wrote:Radius doesn't need to be exact...Players like Cobain and J. Mascis had 12" radius tune-o-matic bridges matched with vintage 7.25" radius necks
I think it mostly depends on your playing style and preferences. That said, I prefer it when neck and bridge match.
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

Also, great chunkiness chart. I think the Jag-Stang would be a 3?
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

Well I think if you are to have mismatches in radius, it's a lot better to err in the other direction, to be flatter at the bridge. In fact, some even prefer it so as to get greater bending ability on the E strings. Also, I think the difference between 7.25" and 9.5" feels a lot bigger than 9.5" and 12".
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

Good point. Never had a problem with the radius mismatch on a KC Mustang or a MIJ Mascis. However, I put a vintage Mustang bridge on a Squier JM and the mismatch was noticeable. Nothing a pair of washers couldn't fix, but still...
Cymbaline
.
.
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 6:23 pm

Post by Cymbaline »

Is there a drop-in bridge replacement for Teh Kurdts with the correct radius yet? Don't care if it's TOM.
I still get buzzing on that thing from time to time.