New Jaguar + pickup question

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

New Jaguar + pickup question

Post by bill.lee »

Hi guys!

A month ago I purchased this cutie for a ridiculous price (the seller was super sure it was a Squier Jaguar!), it's a 2002-3 CIJ old apple red Jaguar.

Image

It plays great (even if the fretboard has a small bump somewhere in the first frets, but it doesn't really affect the playability other than setting the string height a little higher than I'm used to, but actually it's still super comfortable), the vibrato is surprisingly stable, and the pups don't sound that bad. I dropped one of the new Staytrem fixed bridges and quite like it, it probably affects a little the tuning stability using the vibrato but again I'm used to retune it very often, so it's not really an issue.
My main gripe is about the sound. The pickups sound better than I expected, but the sound is thinner than what I'd like. It's not a problem of the japanese pickups (I used to have an AVRI some time ago and the sound of this one is not so distant!), it's more a problem of the vintage jag sound which is too thin for my needs. I play jazz funk, love this guitar (super comfortable to play and it's really gorgeous just to look at) and need a warmer and thicker sound. What kind of pickups would you suggest? I'd avoid boutique ones since they are quite expensive, and I would have no problems putting humbuckers in this guitar.

FYI I also have a Gibson Les Paul Special P90 and a Squier VMJM with Creamery WRHB, and would like to have pickups at least as warm as the ones on these other guitars.. My main amp is a Mesa Boogie Mark III set clean with a T-Rex Moller overdrive, a Mooer Blue Faze (sounds like a starved fuzz face on acid) and other stuff..

Thanks!
User avatar
Thomas
.
.
Posts: 3591
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:05 am
Location: Glasgow, UK

Post by Thomas »

Seymour Duncan Quarter Pounder for Jaguar. Best Jag pickups ever.
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

They are quite interesting indeed.. Have you compared them volume-wise to p90s? are they louder? My Les Paul Special P90 is quite loud and I fear they would sound even louder
Dillon
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:03 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Dillon »

AVRI for neck, it is much fatter sounding than the specs indicate. Agreed on quarter pounder for bridge; it's not too hot. And, honestly, the Squier "Duncan Designed" bridge pickup sounds fantastic to my ears.
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Dillon wrote:AVRI for neck, it is much fatter sounding than the specs indicate. Agreed on quarter pounder for bridge; it's not too hot. And, honestly, the Squier "Duncan Designed" bridge pickup sounds fantastic to my ears.
So you would recommend the AVRI over the quarter pounder for the neck pickup, right? Have you ever compared the avri with the duncan sjag vintage one?
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Thomas wrote:Seymour Duncan Quarter Pounder for Jaguar. Best Jag pickups ever.
I think they are a bit harsh on the cleans.
SJAG-2 all the way for me, hot vintage sound. They handle almost any style.
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Fran wrote:
Thomas wrote:Seymour Duncan Quarter Pounder for Jaguar. Best Jag pickups ever.
I think they are a bit harsh on the cleans.
SJAG-2 all the way for me, hot vintage sound. They handle almost any style.
It's funny because you are one of the very few who praise duncan hots.. have you compared them with other jaguar pickups?
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

bill.lee wrote:
Fran wrote:
Thomas wrote:Seymour Duncan Quarter Pounder for Jaguar. Best Jag pickups ever.
I think they are a bit harsh on the cleans.
SJAG-2 all the way for me, hot vintage sound. They handle almost any style.
It's funny because you are one of the very few who praise duncan hots.. have you compared them with other jaguar pickups?
The name is a bit misleading, they aren't as hot as a QP and if I remember right the output is lower. I've tried about four different types (including the QP, vintage, CIJ and AVRI) and preferred them. I currently have some in my Duo, although the claw isn't present and I used 500k pots.

Kind of related; I found it interesting that J Mascis used Duncan Antiquity pickups in his Jazzmasters and not higher output types despite his high gain sound. His theory was the magnets had mellowed with age and didn't sound as harsh with high gain.

Another option could be changing the 1meg pots to a lower value, but that's another debate. Considering most Fenders used 250k, there must be something in it.

It's been some years since I tinkered with Jaguars but there's plenty of others on here like paul that good knowledge on them.

Nice Jag btw and for the record, stock CIJ pickups are by far the worst of the bunch in my opinion. Upgrading will turn it into a great guitar.
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Fran wrote:
bill.lee wrote:
Fran wrote: I think they are a bit harsh on the cleans.
SJAG-2 all the way for me, hot vintage sound. They handle almost any style.
It's funny because you are one of the very few who praise duncan hots.. have you compared them with other jaguar pickups?
The name is a bit misleading, they aren't as hot as a QP and if I remember right the output is lower. I've tried about four different types (including the QP, vintage, CIJ and AVRI) and preferred them. I currently have some in my Duo, although the claw isn't present and I used 500k pots.

Kind of related; I found it interesting that J Mascis used Duncan Antiquity pickups in his Jazzmasters and not higher output types despite his high gain sound. His theory was the magnets had mellowed with age and didn't sound as harsh with high gain.

Another option could be changing the 1meg pots to a lower value, but that's another debate. Considering most Fenders used 250k, there must be something in it.

It's been some years since I tinkered with Jaguars but there's plenty of others on here like paul that good knowledge on them.

Nice Jag btw and for the record, stock CIJ pickups are by far the worst of the bunch in my opinion. Upgrading will turn it into a great guitar.
Could you compare the hot and the quarter pounders? Is the neck QP harsher too? From the (few) clean soundclips it sounded warm and round rather than harsh.. How would you compare them against avri's?
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

I don't have experience with the Jaguar side of this, but anytime I buy AVRI single coils ('50s Strat and '60s Tele so far) they're the best vintage-style Fender pickups I've ever tried (even having advantages over actual vintage pickups which are usually all worn out/weaker by now or just had crazy inconsistent tolerances to begin with), and anytime I try Duncans they're something a bit more modern and robust that handle palm-muting and psycho dirt pedals, etc... a little better. YMMV, naturally... will have a lot to do with your amp, what you use for gain, and the natural sound of your guitar whether it has pickups in it or not.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

bill.lee wrote:
Fran wrote:
bill.lee wrote: It's funny because you are one of the very few who praise duncan hots.. have you compared them with other jaguar pickups?
The name is a bit misleading, they aren't as hot as a QP and if I remember right the output is lower. I've tried about four different types (including the QP, vintage, CIJ and AVRI) and preferred them. I currently have some in my Duo, although the claw isn't present and I used 500k pots.

Kind of related; I found it interesting that J Mascis used Duncan Antiquity pickups in his Jazzmasters and not higher output types despite his high gain sound. His theory was the magnets had mellowed with age and didn't sound as harsh with high gain.

Another option could be changing the 1meg pots to a lower value, but that's another debate. Considering most Fenders used 250k, there must be something in it.

It's been some years since I tinkered with Jaguars but there's plenty of others on here like paul that good knowledge on them.

Nice Jag btw and for the record, stock CIJ pickups are by far the worst of the bunch in my opinion. Upgrading will turn it into a great guitar.
Could you compare the hot and the quarter pounders? Is the neck QP harsher too? From the (few) clean soundclips it sounded warm and round rather than harsh.. How would you compare them against avri's?
Like I said, it's been a while...
I'm talking bridge position only, the hot sounds more musical to me if that makes sense? It's more tonally balanced, yet I found the QP a bit bland, like ceramic pickups. It didn't particularly shine in any department and was all high mids.
Cant remember the AVRI, it's so long ago.

The good thing with pup upgrades is they hold most of their value in the event of a resale. So it may be an idea to try a few.
Dillon
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:03 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Dillon »

That's about how I remember the QP (though I don't consider it bland, personally). Typical characteristics of most other high output pickups---a very "modern" sound when purely clean, and it doesn't have as much of the single coil jangle that an AVRI or SJag-1 or -2 would. But, it's ballsy when driven. Loves high gain. I like that, personally. But then, I did put a humbucker in the bridge of my own Jaguar :roll:

The SJag-2, I had in a Jaguar years ago. My memory may be a bit clouded, but I remember it as being "just OK", better than the factory MIJ pickup it had, but nothing exceptional about it. Still too weak for my taste.

Duncan's own demos are a pretty good comparison.

[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Thanks again guys!

I already saw those videos, but to me there is too much distortion to understand the differences.. Comparing the pickups in SD site, it seems that the SJAG-1 neck is the warmer and most articulate, the other ones sound kinda dull - but probably the fault is in the clips ;-)

I'm also having a weird idea.. has anyone ever put a pair of SD lil 59's in a jaguar? From the clips online they sound really full and warm but articulate - and I play lots of complex jazz chords..
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

I think a few have, same with the JB Jr which I have also tried, a lot of folk tried to beef up their Jags sound at one time. I also routed for humbuckers once.
Then everyone seemed to switch to other guitars which were more suitable for the sound they were looking for.

You can go so far with it.
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Interesting.. I will probably stick to a vintage sounding neck pickup (probably the AVRI), and put a QP/lil 59 in the bridge. Actually I like the neck sound in this guitar, it's just the bridge which is too thin for my needs. And ergonomically it's so comfortable to play!
User avatar
Fakir Mustache
.
.
Posts: 4362
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm

Post by Fakir Mustache »

I found this, stock Squier pickups distorted towards the end of the video:
[youtube][/youtube]
sounds pretty good to me, you might be able to get a set somehow
NickD wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 11:44 pm
plopswagon wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 7:05 pm Fuck! My car runs on Tubes!
When you press the accelerator past halfway it doesn’t actually go any faster, but the engine noise distorts
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Ok, pulled the trigger on a Novak set. The previous owner (who never actually mounted those p'ups) asked Curtis for a vintage set with a warmer and bassier sound, while retaining clarity. it seems perfect for me! I'll let you know..
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Hi guys! I ended up with that Novak set I wrote in the post before. I had them installed on the guitar and BAM! They sound almost exactly like the old japanese ones. They have a little more definition and the bridge is less anemic, but the mid and neck position are 90% the same as before - so thin and trebly. I'm not saying this by memory, before having the guitar modded I recorder some quick clips and then re-recorded them with the exact same setup - and the sound the same!

I think I'll give up on jags.. I mean, they are the most gorgeous looking guitars in the world, but I simply don't need a guitar so thin sounding (can achieve that sound with my LP special P90, which can sound even a lot fatter)
User avatar
honeyiscool
.
.
Posts: 2072
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Post by honeyiscool »

Should have gone for SJAG-2 like that fellow said.

And you can get a thicker tone just by changing the bridge, too.
Kicking and squealing Gucci little piggy.
bill.lee
.
.
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:58 am

Post by bill.lee »

Actually the bridge is great (a new staytrem), and to me changing bridge doesn't make such a great difference in tone.

I played the guitar more, and actually quite like these pups. I don't really need such a "plinky" sound, so the guitar is still on sale, but meanwhile I'm enjoying it. When I'll have an offer I'll decide if selling or keeping it