12 string Tele build
Moderated By: mods
maybe i'm just bitter because my much lusted after 620/12 arrived with a broken pickup (which i wasn't allowed to fiddle with due to rickenbackers bizarre warranty) and various finish imperfections. this made me less and less willing to tolerate the narrow nut and general unplayability, and so it was sent back the next day. i stand by my comment that they are not practical guitars regardless. people just seem hindered when playing them, relying on a few chord voicings and arpeggios to get some shimmer. i want to be able to pick up a 12 string and play it in the same way i play a 6 string, with no restrictions - soloing, jazz chords, open tuning and finger style. an individually intonatable bridge and wider nut, available on many other non-rick models, allows this.
rickenbacker have now cottoned onto this though and offer a 12 saddle bridge and wider nut on models like the 660/12 but they are nearly double the price of standard models, but they are very pretty...
to my shame, if i won the lottery i'd still check it out
rickenbacker have now cottoned onto this though and offer a 12 saddle bridge and wider nut on models like the 660/12 but they are nearly double the price of standard models, but they are very pretty...
to my shame, if i won the lottery i'd still check it out
lots of nice features. that nut width is similar to a DC12 and fender strat 12 string which i can do most things on. additionally it has the slotted headstock design, which is on ricks (most rick models however are not completely slotted, just recessed, making string changing slightly difficult)dezb1 wrote:This sounds like your kind of guitar George:
[youtube][/youtube]
George wrote:lots of nice features. that nut width is similar to a DC12 and fender strat 12 string which i can do most things on. additionally it has the slotted headstock design, which is on ricks (most rick models however are not completely slotted, just recessed, making string changing slightly difficult)dezb1 wrote:This sounds like your kind of guitar George:
[youtube][/youtube]
Again with the Ric hate... You're like a spurned lover, that Ric experience has really affected you.
Ha, no, it's quite funny (and refreshing).
When I first started playing the guitar I wanted to get a Rickenbacker, because Ride, but they were way out of my price range then and I'd lost interest by the time I could afford one. I do sort of admire their refusal to make non-US budget Rickenbackers but there is also a total load of bollocks associated with the brand. IMHO etc.
When I first started playing the guitar I wanted to get a Rickenbacker, because Ride, but they were way out of my price range then and I'd lost interest by the time I could afford one. I do sort of admire their refusal to make non-US budget Rickenbackers but there is also a total load of bollocks associated with the brand. IMHO etc.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
BearBoy wrote:Ha, no, it's quite funny (and refreshing).
When I first started playing the guitar I wanted to get a Rickenbacker, because Ride, but they were way out of my price range then and I'd lost interest by the time I could afford one. I do sort of admire their refusal to make non-US budget Rickenbackers but there is also a total load of bollocks associated with the brand. IMHO etc.
This^ apart from it was because of Marr not ride... I've still never played a Ric.
Me neither. Maybe I should actually give one a go. Might actually like it.dezb1 wrote:BearBoy wrote:Ha, no, it's quite funny (and refreshing).
When I first started playing the guitar I wanted to get a Rickenbacker, because Ride, but they were way out of my price range then and I'd lost interest by the time I could afford one. I do sort of admire their refusal to make non-US budget Rickenbackers but there is also a total load of bollocks associated with the brand. IMHO etc.
This^ apart from it was because of Marr not ride... I've still never played a Ric.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
Done a bit more work on the beast tonight, got it all wired up and went to string it and had two problems 1, one if the machine heads isn't drilled all the way through and 2, the strings came in a big unmarked bundle and I have no idea what goes where... Is it optional whether the thin string goes at the top? And if so are the low E strings the thinnest wound string and the thickest, therefore leaving the G B E strings all unwound or is the thinnest wound string the G?
How many wound strings have you?
The thicker string of each pair should be closer to your nose when playing.
As I understand it the E and A strings get double two octaves up. The D one octave, and the G, B and e strings are all just doubled in the same octave.
So that would mean you should (could?) have either three wound strings (Low E, Low A, Low D) or five (Low E, Low A, Low D and the two Gs).
The thicker string of each pair should be closer to your nose when playing.
As I understand it the E and A strings get double two octaves up. The D one octave, and the G, B and e strings are all just doubled in the same octave.
So that would mean you should (could?) have either three wound strings (Low E, Low A, Low D) or five (Low E, Low A, Low D and the two Gs).
not quite paul. E to G strings are all octaved but just one octave up from the regular string. B and E are doubled up, same octave
pretty much *all* 12 strings except rickenbackers have the thinner octave drone string like this nearer your nose (good description):
E
E
B
B
G
G (drone)
D
D (drone)
A
A (drone)
E
E (drone)
check the nut grooves and it should corroborate with that. the B and top E are just repeated obvs. if you're cutting your own nut you can swap the octaves and the regular string if you like, to replicate how a rick does it. up to you, the bridge won't care
if you're stuck and can't tell which string goes where, check with a set of digi calipers or feel thickness and rough it out against a standard set description online. if you have a, let's say 9-42 gauge, they're all pretty much apcked the same
pretty much *all* 12 strings except rickenbackers have the thinner octave drone string like this nearer your nose (good description):
E
E
B
B
G
G (drone)
D
D (drone)
A
A (drone)
E
E (drone)
check the nut grooves and it should corroborate with that. the B and top E are just repeated obvs. if you're cutting your own nut you can swap the octaves and the regular string if you like, to replicate how a rick does it. up to you, the bridge won't care
if you're stuck and can't tell which string goes where, check with a set of digi calipers or feel thickness and rough it out against a standard set description online. if you have a, let's say 9-42 gauge, they're all pretty much apcked the same
By "drone" do you mean the lower or higher (pitchwise)?
You are right. It seems my brother's 12 string (which I'm basing all this off) was done Lead Belly style. Perhaps for teh kurtz.wikipedia wrote:The most common tuning, considered standard today, is E3•E2 A3•A2 D4•D3 G4•G3 B3•B3 E4•E4, moving from lowest (6th) course to highest (1st) course. Lead Belly and some other players have doubled the lowest course two octaves above instead of one, producing a third string in unison with the top course.
- BobArsecake
- a mannequin made by madmen
- Posts: 10957
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)
Personal preference/idiosyncrasies figure into this so much though... I'm absolutely hindered by the extra-wide nut on my Seagull S12+... when I play Ricky 12-strings they seem more practical to me because I can wrap my hands around the neck like a regular guitar.George wrote:maybe i'm just bitter because my much lusted after 620/12 arrived with a broken pickup (which i wasn't allowed to fiddle with due to rickenbackers bizarre warranty) and various finish imperfections. this made me less and less willing to tolerate the narrow nut and general unplayability, and so it was sent back the next day. i stand by my comment that they are not practical guitars regardless. people just seem hindered when playing them, relying on a few chord voicings and arpeggios to get some shimmer. i want to be able to pick up a 12 string and play it in the same way i play a 6 string, with no restrictions - soloing, jazz chords, open tuning and finger style. an individually intonatable bridge and wider nut, available on many other non-rick models, allows this.
I've sort of been cautioned vicariously by your experience with Rick, if that makes you feel better. Every time my finger is poised over the Buy It Now button on a $1500 4001 because I've been watching Sgt Peppers/Lemmy/Cliff Burton vids all night I'm like "well, what if this goes all Georgy in my face..."
I've always been weary of their "dangerously close to that other Adolph" business policies though, to be fair.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"