Neck Comparison Question

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
satans_mariachi
.
.
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 3:40 pm
Location: Denton, TX

Neck Comparison Question

Post by satans_mariachi »

Hey there folks, first post here. I recently played a lacquer 60s Jaguar, and loved the neck. How do they compare to the AVRI 62 Jag necks?
User avatar
singlepup
.
.
Posts: 4206
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:27 am
Location: San Diego

Post by singlepup »

I played a 60s roadworn Jag recently and liked the neck. Had a great feel to it overall. Very similar to my old 62 AVRI in terms of chunkiness. However, I found the roadworn more comfortable. I never really liked the shape of the 62 AVRI neck.

Others are gonna disagree with me here though. A lot of people love the 62 AVRI on this site, but I sold mine because of the neck. I actually liked the Squier Jag's neck much better.
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022402
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

The 62 avri is more rounded than the Japanese necks which have a flatter profile. It's definitely an adjustment switching back and forth (and I have to admit I like my Japanese jag neck better), but the avri is still a great neck.
User avatar
Johnny Alien
.
.
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 7:59 pm

Post by Johnny Alien »

I feel the road worn and classic lacquer series necks are ever so slightly chunkier than the AVRI line but they are pretty close. I agree that the road worn finish makes the neck very comfy. I prefer it to a standard AVRI neck.
User avatar
satans_mariachi
.
.
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 3:40 pm
Location: Denton, TX

Post by satans_mariachi »

Thanks for the help fellas! Between here and Offset, the general consensus is that they are similar or even smaller. That suits me JUST FINE!!
User avatar
Johnny Alien
.
.
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 7:59 pm

Post by Johnny Alien »

I would say the AVRI 62 is definitely a little slimmer. If that is what would work for you then I think you are golden.
arkivel
.
.
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 5:00 am

Post by arkivel »

The 62 reissue AVRI necks all seem pretty close to a modern Fender C profile. They're a little too thin for me.
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

It's a nicer neck profile. Fit my hand better and felt fast.
The AVRI I tried years ago had a chunky neck IIRC. The lacquer had one more similar to my CiJ Jaguar.
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

As a regular CIJ Jag-slinger I can also confirm that the AVRI '62 neck profile is decidedly fatter feeling than those... if the Lacquer '60s neck compares to the Japanese ones then the AVRI will probably feel bigger to you.

Don't know what the new AV Jag ('65 I believe) feels like but as it costs 100 billion dollars I imagine that's out of most people's equation.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

paul_ wrote:Don't know what the new AV Jag ('65 I believe) feels like but as it costs 100 billion dollars I imagine that's out of most people's equation.
I tried one but I remember not really being that arsed about it. IIRC felt more rounded than the flatter feeling CIJ/Lacquer necks.
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED