Calling SGeniuses. Need help ID'ing an SG.

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
mkt3000
.
.
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:01 pm
Location: Miami

Calling SGeniuses. Need help ID'ing an SG.

Post by mkt3000 »

I just found this on offerup for dirt cheap, and I'm trying to ID it.

Seller says it's a refin (which I believe 100%) - just trying to figure out what kind of SG this is.

Image

Image

Image
10 PRINT "Bite Me!"
20 GOTO 10
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

Dunno but it looks cool
User avatar
benecol
Best Poster 2010
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Westcountry

Post by benecol »

I thought maybe it was a refinished SG Elite (late 80s model), but it's not. I'd say that's very very fake.
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Agreed w/benecol.

It's definitely loaded with "Maestro" parts which was like Gibson's recent Walmart brand. I didn't think it's just a modded Maestro because those had bolt-on maple necks, but after investigating a bit closer I now think it's possible from the neck heel/joint that it's actually one of those that has been converted to set-neck and then wood-filled/sanded down/primer'd over... it certainly has the same tuners they did. The early '70s models that had that sort of [fucking huge] headstock had volutes, and no tilt-back angle on the peghead, they also had vintage diameter strip Klusons. The fingerboard heel on this thing is modern as fuck (not like a Norlin at all) and the truss rod cavity/fret location for the neck joint is wrong for any Gibsons too. It just looks all kinds of wrong, this combination of build-features just as far as the wood parts are concerned never appeared on a Gibson.

Image
Image
Last edited by paul_ on Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
Dillon
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:03 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Dillon »

^ That. Avoid. lolz at how poorly cut the neck pickup route was.
User avatar
George
.
.
Posts: 20953
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK

Post by George »

Headstock doesn't look official.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

I reckon it's fake too.

They made some oddball 'Special' stuff in the 70's and 80's to try and make the model more appealing but everything conflicts on this.
I don't recall Gibson ever using those machine heads, the inlays at the twelfth fret are too wide apart (some Japanese companies did this on copies, my Flying V being one example) and why all the extra routing for the sake of a flimsy scratchplate?
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Fran wrote:the inlays at the twelfth fret are too wide apart
Actually Gibsons did have the dots that far apart from the '50s-'70s.

Image

The headstock is ok shape/size wise for the weirdo '70s Gibsons, but without a volute/that neck joint/that squared-off fingerboard end it doesn't go for any that I know of. To the best of my knowledge Gibsons never had an "import" style truss rod cavity like that either. Also worth noting that SGs of the weirdo '70s period did not have bevels on the inner part of the horns (SG bevels weren't truly standardized to where they are now/where this thing is until 1990 or so, on the '60s models they varied from body to body in terms of width and contour)

My '72 SG-II (looks like the classic Poo Brown from the front but is actually a "shop window" Cherry model)

Image
Image
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

paul_ wrote:
My '72 SG-II (looks like the classic Poo Brown from the front but is actually a "shop window" Cherry model)

Image
Fuck! So nice, never even seen one of these before
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post by dezb1 »

Doog wrote:
paul_ wrote:
My '72 SG-II (looks like the classic Poo Brown from the front but is actually a "shop window" Cherry model)

Image
Fuck! So nice, never even seen one of these before
Reminds me of the Lee Ranaldo model

Image
XY
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

That's an SG Deluxe from the same period. I believe the SG Deluxe, along with the Les Paul Deluxe, briefly replaced the "Standard" models in the early '70s before the SG Standard was reintroduced in 1973. These guitars also had a super narrow nut width, similar to A-width Fender (it's the closest feel I have to the Jag-Stang neck on another guitar when you're playing low on the neck).

These are the '72 and '73 SG sections in the Gibson catalog

Image

Image
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

mkt3000's been silent for >24 hours about this. Hoping he didn't buy it. :oops: :oops:
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

I've never liked SGs, but I do want that one of _paul's.
Image
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Bacchus wrote:I've never liked SGs, but I do want that one of _paul's.
I actually considered calling an NGD thread that never happened about the SG-II and my '67 Melody Maker "I don't normally like SGs but I'd play that one," as SGs seem to be the number one type of guitar you hear that said about online.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post by dezb1 »

SG's are great I'm just sorry I took so long getting round to buying one.

Also hope mkt didn't buy this one
XY
User avatar
mkt3000
.
.
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:01 pm
Location: Miami

Post by mkt3000 »

dezb1 wrote:Also hope mkt didn't buy this one
I did not.

Although Sam Ash has a used Epiphone Flying V that's talking to me, and there's a Roland JC50 on Craigslist for cheap. So I think I'm locking myself in my apartment this weekend so I don't spend money.
10 PRINT "Bite Me!"
20 GOTO 10
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

haha, the dark side has been tempting you a lot lately. Guessing you didn't go for the Silvertone?
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

paul_ wrote:
Bacchus wrote:I've never liked SGs, but I do want that one of _paul's.
I actually considered calling an NGD thread that never happened about the SG-II and my '67 Melody Maker "I don't normally like SGs but I'd play that one," as SGs seem to be the number one type of guitar you hear that said about online.
Dibs on both

I think it's the extra plates 'n stuff that do it for me on Gibsons; I still lust after a 'Recording' Les Paul

Image
edit: totally RobRoed that img link
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

paul_ wrote:
Fran wrote:the inlays at the twelfth fret are too wide apart
Actually Gibsons did have the dots that far apart
Thanks for clearing that up Paul.
I don't recall ever seeing any but your picture is proof.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

dezb1 wrote:SG's are great I'm just sorry I took so long getting round to buying one.
Before I went Fender mad I had about four SGs and a LP Junior. Soundwise they are still my favourite guitars with Teles being close behind.