Some thoughts on the Boss DS-1

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

paul_ wrote:My fave Kurt live and studio sounds were his Jag (1meg pots and Super D) going through a DS-2. I always thought his MIJ Stangs and Sansamp on the In Utero tours sounded like flat-ass dogshit by comparison. The In Utero sessions were great too though as they were the dream team through a Twin Reverb (versus his ridiculous live rig).

[youtube][/youtube]
This is some PHAT TONE
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Fran wrote:Mode I or II?

That recording sounds more like mode I to me, which is basically a DS-1 circuit, right?

Mode II sounds more vowel-like, almost like a cocked Wah setting.
Neither mode on a DS-2 sounds or behaves anything a DS-1 to me. I’ve heard a lot of people say it over the years but I’m not convinced they even aimed it that way unless the Japanese DS-1 was actually THAT much different than the current one.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

paul_ wrote:
Fran wrote:Mode I or II?

That recording sounds more like mode I to me, which is basically a DS-1 circuit, right?

Mode II sounds more vowel-like, almost like a cocked Wah setting.
Neither mode on a DS-2 sounds or behaves anything a DS-1 to me. I’ve heard a lot of people say it over the years but I’m not convinced they even aimed it that way unless the Japanese DS-1 was actually THAT much different than the current one.
Interesting.
My DS-1 has the Jizzer Mod so can't really compare it to my DS-2.
I seem to remember them being similar but that was a long time ago.

That black label SD-1 sounds different to the current model so who knows...
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

The circuits are totally different.

DS-1 is an op-amp with buffering and a boost up front

Image

DS-2 is all discrete bipolar transistors and FETs, no op-amps

Image

DS-1 clips to Vref (half supply) and DS-2 clips to ground

Distortion and Tone controls/networks look really different.
User avatar
NickS
.
.
Posts: 13769
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:08 am
Location: Down at the end, round by a corner

Post by NickS »

DS-2 is all discrete bipolar transistors and FETs, no op-amps
And apart from the long-tailed pair, all the FETs are used as switches. Three pairs of clipping diodes, and the remote Turbo input. Seems a little over-egged to me, but I've got cloth ears.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Mike wrote:The circuits are totally different.

DS-1 is an op-amp with buffering and a boost up front

Image

DS-2 is all discrete bipolar transistors and FETs, no op-amps

Image

DS-1 clips to Vref (half supply) and DS-2 clips to ground

Distortion and Tone controls/networks look really different.
Thanks Mike.

Any idea on the DF-2 circuit, minus the feedback of course. All three sounded similar to me.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

NickS is more of a circuit guru than me, he saw right through the DS-2 circuit :)

The DF-2 is a BEAST

http://images.talkbass.com/attachments ... g.1396652/

From what I can tell the distortion side looks a bit more DS-1 ish than the DS-2

Input preamp stage into op amp - clipping to ground and then the tone control doesn't really match either the DS-1 or the DS-2...

My guess is they started with the DS-1 basics but then did a whole bunch of tweaking. It's not 100% of either of them

I'm sure Nick can get much more than I could though
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Good stuff Mike.

About the most informative thread we've had on here in ages.
User avatar
NickS
.
.
Posts: 13769
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:08 am
Location: Down at the end, round by a corner

Post by NickS »

Mike's spot on about the distortion path for the DF-2. The "feedbacker" bit is interesting, I'll have to find a YouTube video to hear how it works.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

NickS wrote:Mike's spot on about the distortion path for the DF-2. The "feedbacker" bit is interesting, I'll have to find a YouTube video to hear how it works.
It works like the EHX Freeze. A bit like tinnitus in a pedal.

I've only ever seen one two bands exploit that pedal well and that was Swervedriver and the Kitchens of Distinction.

[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]
User avatar
Concretebadger
.
.
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
Contact:

Post by Concretebadger »

Fascinating.

It's interesting to see the DS-2 is discrete components rather than op-amps...I normally expect newer versions of a circuit to go more towards the op-amp route because I assumed it would be cheaper. One of these days I'm going to buy that book that Boss published where they interview the techs/designers...I doubt it has circuit diagrams or schematics and the listing is probably out of date by now, but there's probably some interesting info on the design process for the old classics.

I wonder what the guts of an OS-2 look like - it would be interesting to see how two separate circuits are squeezed onto one board.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electron ... php?id=163

The OS-2 is really cool!

the signal is buffered and then split and goes two ways:


1. to an op-amp based Distortion design (hard clipping to ground - sort of like a DS-1 without the input boost)

2. to an op-amp based Overdrive design (assymetrical soft clipping in feedback loop - more like an SD-1)

the clever part is they SHARE a dual gang Drive pot so when you change the gain they both are moved up and down together

Then a COLOR pot effectively mixes the outputs of these two paths together into one, and then feeds the tone control (new, again not DS-1 or DS-2 like) and level control to create the output

So it really is what you would hope it is, two separate circuits you can blend before tone and output level are set.
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

You guys know about the OD-2 and BD-2 circuits? The latter is supposed to be an improved version of the OD2
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED
User avatar
sunshiner
.
.
Posts: 8299
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:05 pm
Location: Around the corner

Post by sunshiner »

^^^^Mad Professor Sweet Honey is the same circuit as BD-2, costs twice more money. But I'll save your time - Joyo Sweet Baby is a direct copy of Sweet Honey and costs $30
matte30is wrote:Someone man up and get a balloon.