I'm recording a track for the charity my wife works for and I'm hoping I'm near finished....
I'd be super-grateful if some of you could run your ears over this
Every time I mix using my headphones, the bass ends up crazy boomy because I must be compensating for that. So I've tried to tame it a fair bit. My hifi system at home is fairly bassy. To me, it sounds like it's booming a bit on my hifi, which probably isn't a problem.
Also, have I fallen for the trap of compressing everything and then turning everything up louder than everything else?
Thanks.
Opinions Sought: Is this too boomy?
Moderated By: mods
-
Freddy V-C
- NOD FLANGERS
- Posts: 5591
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm
Sounds alright to me. Maybe a little bit boomy but not enough for it to be a problem imo. If you want to tidy up the low end without faffing about loads with individual aspects of the mix, I often shove a master EQ on my whole mix with a high pass filter somewhere between 35 and 80Hz (depending on the track) and take out around 3 or 4dB at 350Hz. You could give that a try and see if it neatens things up a bit.
Sounds fine on my Plantronics foam-pad headset, so maybe it is a bit bass-heavy; what are people going to be listening on (what media is it going out on?)
A good job IMHO, but if you re-record the vocals, put more stress on the first syllable so that it sounds less like hoss piss care. I found the mention of skin slightly surprising but I guess you need to stress the inclusivity.
A good job IMHO, but if you re-record the vocals, put more stress on the first syllable so that it sounds less like hoss piss care. I found the mention of skin slightly surprising but I guess you need to stress the inclusivity.
Sounds a little bit boomy to me (PC connected to Tannoy monitors) but not sure how much of that might be down to you saying it was boomy and putting the thought in my head. 
Nothing I'd worry too much about though tbh.
Disclaimer - my mixes often sound fairly shitty so I'd ignore me and listen to Freddy.
Nothing I'd worry too much about though tbh.
Disclaimer - my mixes often sound fairly shitty so I'd ignore me and listen to Freddy.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
-
Fakir Mustache
- .
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm
-
Concretebadger
- .
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
- Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
- Contact:
It sounds fine through my hi-fi speakers, but the commonplace technique for recording acoustic guitar seems to be to send it through a high pass filter that completely obliterates everything except the upper mids and treble. That's often acoustic guitar being mixed with other instruments though, where you're going for the percussive jangle more than anything. A bit of Nick Drake or something similar might be a better yardstick for solo acoustic, where you need the "body" of the sound to still be there.
The way I approach mixing in general is similar to Freddy's: set the eq to cut anything below 50-80Hz. Frequencies lower than those don't get reproduced by most home hi-fi speakers and headphones, and it's probably out of human hearing range anyway. If you want to tighten up the bottom end and get rid of the mud, that might be a good thing to try.
This tune really does sound okay to my ears though.
The way I approach mixing in general is similar to Freddy's: set the eq to cut anything below 50-80Hz. Frequencies lower than those don't get reproduced by most home hi-fi speakers and headphones, and it's probably out of human hearing range anyway. If you want to tighten up the bottom end and get rid of the mud, that might be a good thing to try.
This tune really does sound okay to my ears though.
