![Image](http://bestnetworx.com/uploader/files/56/IMAG0271.jpg)
50 watts tuebs
Clean, gain, Moar Gain, 25w switch...
$200
Cat has accepted it as a perch
Moderated By: mods
Pics or it didn't happen.robroe wrote:Cat has accepted it as a perch
AcousticDoog wrote:Niceeeee, esp at that price. I don't think I've ever seen an Acoustic over here, and it's literally the hardest brand name to Google
matte30is wrote:Someone man up and get a balloon.
The volume of guitar amplifiers was on a hyperbolic curve throughout the entire decade that gave us The Boomers. If you start with the guitar volume of the Everly Brothers in 1960 and end with Jimi Hendrix in 1969, the volume differential is similar to the one between a sewing machine and a Saturn V rocket. The Ampeg B-15 was simply not designed to win a head-to-head collision with a Marshall stack set to “kill.� Something had to be done on behalf of bass players everywhere.
In 1967, enter the Acoustic 360, a 200-watt, solid state head designed to drive the 361 cabinet, a rear-firing 18� speaker enclosure modeled, I believe, after the Panzer tank. The 360/361 absolutely towered over the B-15, physically and sonically, and got the bass world ready for the Woodstocks, Altamonts and giant festival concerts to come.
In December of 1967, the Acoustic 360 actually helped The Doors get arrested for noise violations and put them - and the amp - on the cover of Life magazine. This notoriety had a very predictable response, which is that it made the amp a must-have for serious rockers who would love to be arrested by The Man for bass notes alone.
Not that this was an easily accessible piece of gear. The suggested retail price of the 360/361 package back in 1967 was $1250.00, which in 2014 dollars comes to USD$8,850.00 Not. A. Typo. There is not, to my knowledge, another bass amp that costs nine grand, unless you’re cutting an SSL console in half and dragging that around, which is actually a pretty awesome idea.
Nevertheless, price be damned, the best bassists of the era knew that this was a killer amplifier. Larry Graham himself used these towering stacks for the thumb, the stank and the funk. Led Zeppelin’s virtuosic bassist John Paul Jones had to keep up with Jimmy Page, for the love of Pete, and with the Acoustic 360 (or, say, a wall of them) he could. And there was a young bassist from Florida who knew that if he was going to be The Best, he had to play The Best Amp. That’s when Jaco Pastorius saved all his money (legend has it, sleeping on the beach when his bandmates on the road slept in hotel beds) and eventually purchased an Acoustic 360, which gave Jaco’s fretless J-bass that instantly-recognizable bump in the upper-mids that provided him bassdom’s most enduring, original voice.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
paul_ wrote:When are homeland security gonna get on this "2-piece King Size Snickers" horseshit that showed up a couple years ago? I've started dropping one of them on the floor of my car every time.
I didn't say I couldn't find the website, it's just a generic name which turns up a lot of ugly brown combossunshiner wrote:AcousticDoog wrote:Niceeeee, esp at that price. I don't think I've ever seen an Acoustic over here, and it's literally the hardest brand name to Google
Nick wrote: Can't go wrong with a 50w tube head for $200 tho.
I figured, but lol who cares, as long as nothing's ratting around or microphonic. If it sounds good, you really have the previous owner to thank for breaking in the tubes.robroe wrote:Nick wrote: Can't go wrong with a 50w tube head for $200 tho.
its used. i might have forgot to mention.
it looks and feels and sounds brand new to me though. fuck whoever played it for 10 minutes and brought it back.