Return of the Bassman
Moderated By: mods
Return of the Bassman
Those of you who have been around that long will remember that 10 years ago I bought James' blackface Bassman (LANK), and some of you will have played it at Doogfest II when it was still James'. It was a 1964 AA864 circuit, which is arguably the most sought after version having been in production only between Aug '64 and Jan '65 at which point CBS made some changes. Anyway, it was an AWESOME amp, and unfortunately about 3 years ago I sold it. It was possibly by biggest gear regret ever, but I needed the cash and it wasn't being used much.
Fast forward to this week when I spotted another '64 AA864 Bassman on eBay. After chatting a bit with the seller I took the plunge, and got it yesterday. The seller was in Bodmin, Cornwall about 60 miles from me, and I could only realistically make it down to pick it up next Friday, but he offered to drive it up yesterday! Top bloke. His friend had acquired the amp in the early seventies and then passed it onto him when he moved abroad about 30 years ago. Funnily they are both bass players and used it as a bass amp. It's pretty much all original, just the knobs and one jack socket have been replaced. Even the tubes are original! Though that's not a good thing! Switched out the pre-amp tubes and it's nice and quiet...need to do the power tubes and get it re-biased. It's a bit worn, but actually not too bad for a 56 year old amp! Need to spend some time cleaning it up properly. Production stamp puts it at a Nov '64 assembly. Just serviced and recapped in July this year. One of the best things is that it's a proper export version so switchable to 240V and no need for an external transformer.
Got it home, plugged it in and it sounded just as good as I remember James' sounding. Really happy. Not letting this one go.
Fast forward to this week when I spotted another '64 AA864 Bassman on eBay. After chatting a bit with the seller I took the plunge, and got it yesterday. The seller was in Bodmin, Cornwall about 60 miles from me, and I could only realistically make it down to pick it up next Friday, but he offered to drive it up yesterday! Top bloke. His friend had acquired the amp in the early seventies and then passed it onto him when he moved abroad about 30 years ago. Funnily they are both bass players and used it as a bass amp. It's pretty much all original, just the knobs and one jack socket have been replaced. Even the tubes are original! Though that's not a good thing! Switched out the pre-amp tubes and it's nice and quiet...need to do the power tubes and get it re-biased. It's a bit worn, but actually not too bad for a 56 year old amp! Need to spend some time cleaning it up properly. Production stamp puts it at a Nov '64 assembly. Just serviced and recapped in July this year. One of the best things is that it's a proper export version so switchable to 240V and no need for an external transformer.
Got it home, plugged it in and it sounded just as good as I remember James' sounding. Really happy. Not letting this one go.
Me neither but I like seeing other people’s. Congrats Thom; glad you’ve been (sort of) reunited.gusman2x wrote:Man that’s a lovely thing!
Can’t see me needing gig volumes for a long time, if ever again actually. Which has got me wanting something like a champ, or a princeton. I just love fender amps so much.
Fran wrote:I love how this place is basic as fuck.
ekwatts wrote:I'm just going to smash it in with a hammer and hope it works. Tone is all in the fingers anyway.
- Fakir Mustache
- .
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm
Selmer? They were making brass instruments before that.Mike wrote:The amp that inspired an entire other company.
It certainly isn't Marshall, completely different circuit.
Or was this on 5 Watt World?
Jim Marshall used the Bassman tweed 5F6-A circuit in 1958-1959 as the template for the JTM45.Fakir Mustache wrote:Selmer? They were making brass instruments before that.Mike wrote:The amp that inspired an entire other company.
It certainly isn't Marshall, completely different circuit.
Or was this on 5 Watt World?
Cheers Hurb Am dead happy.Hurb wrote:Lovely! Well jel.
- Fakir Mustache
- .
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm
Duh!Thom wrote:Jim Marshall used the Bassman tweed 5F6-A circuit in 1958-1959 as the template for the JTM45.Fakir Mustache wrote:Selmer? They were making brass instruments before that.Mike wrote:The amp that inspired an entire other company.
It certainly isn't Marshall, completely different circuit.
Or was this on 5 Watt World?
Guitars also have 6 strings, but sometimes they have seven or even eight!
Oh do get over yourself and fuck off.Fakir Mustache wrote:Duh!Thom wrote:Jim Marshall used the Bassman tweed 5F6-A circuit in 1958-1959 as the template for the JTM45.Fakir Mustache wrote: Selmer? They were making brass instruments before that.
It certainly isn't Marshall, completely different circuit.
Or was this on 5 Watt World?
Guitars also have 6 strings, but sometimes they have seven or even eight!
- Fakir Mustache
- .
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm
Secret fact: the guitar pick is also known as a "plectrum", but most people don't know that.Thom wrote:Oh do get over yourself and fuck off.Fakir Mustache wrote:Duh!Thom wrote: Jim Marshall used the Bassman tweed 5F6-A circuit in 1958-1959 as the template for the JTM45.
Guitars also have 6 strings, but sometimes they have seven or even eight!
I don't even see what your point is here, Fakir, other than being an antagonistic dickhead. Quit it.Fakir Mustache wrote:Duh!Thom wrote:Jim Marshall used the Bassman tweed 5F6-A circuit in 1958-1959 as the template for the JTM45.Fakir Mustache wrote: Selmer? They were making brass instruments before that.
It certainly isn't Marshall, completely different circuit.
Or was this on 5 Watt World?
Guitars also have 6 strings, but sometimes they have seven or even eight!
- Fakir Mustache
- .
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:23 pm
Actually that was my point exactly. Completely different. Look at the schematics.Mike wrote:It may well be a different circuit but the topology is not radically different but that's not even your point silly internet man..
Or the thought also came up that you were actually referring to another company.