Line 6 - Digital dream or Technological nightmare?

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Line 6 - Digital dream or Technological nightmare?

Post by JJLipton »

I've had my pod xt live for a while now and the opinions of the unit in general seem to be polarized. It was all i played through while away at college, since using an amp at pretty much any volume proved to be too loud for dormitory settings. Mainly playing through my vox advt 15 while home at summer and then randomly taking the pod xt live for a jam i noticed a few things that seem to bug me about it.
The good: The clean amp simulations (fender deluxe, twin, etc) sound amazing. Reverbs, modulation, and delay effects also seem to be pretty top notch. I especially enjoy the stereo delay setting on an ac30 patch.

The bad: While the distortions geared towards heavy metal sound pretty authentic to me, milder to moderate levels of gain lack dynamics and the saturation that you get from playing just about any real amp regardless of tubes or solid state. The pedal worked great while i went through a few stints with various desperate local metal acts but i find the distortion extremely lacking when i play music that i actually enjoy. The initial "Attack" of the amp sounds just like the real thing but there is a lack of saturation on all models unless you really drench it in gain.

This was recorded using windows stock recording program, the quality of my playing is as bad if not worse than the quality of the sound.
http://download.yousendit.com/6AE08C5834589F13

I think you can really hear what i mean in this clip.
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

I have an older pod, and the overdrive on the fender type models is really nice. But I agree, the cleans and reverb sims are great, and the rest (with the exception of the afformenoned fender OD) is pretty useless.

That said it was probably the best $70 i ever spent. I think i even nailed some keeper guitar tracks using the POd.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post by Sloan »

They have a new Pocket Pod out that costs like $130. I might look into it just for jamming out song ideas. I still like the idea of using amplifiers and microphones though.
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

Yeah the pocket Pod looks like an interesting product. I'll wait for the Behringer version.
Image
euan
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

I don't like Pods really. I got better results with GuitarRig2 and on the cheaper side with a simple Vox Valvetronix Amp DId.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Convert to mp3 in future too, sheesh. Wav files are bloated.

Ew. Shred. Thumbs Down.
JJLipton
.
.
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:39 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by JJLipton »

Well, thats the thing really. I hate shred too but the dynamics of most of the amp models give you no choice but to play quickly, since sitting on a note for too long will cause it to fade away quicker than on a normal amp. I think i may save up for a used dsl401 combo in the distant future. I like the sound clips of it and everyone who owns one seems to be pretty happy with it.
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

You have to be a fruit to try and use digital modelling devices for distortion or gain sounds.
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.