Amp Woes

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

Which option should I choose?

Go for the twin, reverb is the best.
4
33%
Weber amp kit, someone here needs to get one and see just how hard they really are to build.
5
42%
Small amp, save your money.
1
8%
These choices suck, get something else. (Make a suggestion)
2
17%
 
Total votes: 12
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Amp Woes

Post by Justin J »

I'm at a point where I feel like I need another amp. Right now, I only have a '65 Bandmaster and a DeVille that I never use. Mainly because my Bandmaster makes it look like an idiot, but also the reverb sucks ass. I'll probably end up selling the DeVille someday.
I've had so many ideas about amps, but I can't seem to make a firm decision on what I should do. So I'm enlisting you guyses help.

The Options:

- A local shop has a late '70s master volume twin reverb, the reverb feedbacks but Mike and Filtercap tell me it'll probably be an easy fix. I would probably get a discount because of this and I would definitely check to see if it actually is easily fixable before I buy.

- I'd like to buy a Weber amp kit. Probably a tweed Bandmaster or a Marshall clone. This would be loads of fun to build and probably around the same price as the Twin, but won't have reverb.

- I could also just buy a small tube practice amp like a Musicmaster or a Champ/Princeton and save my money for guitar/effect purchases.
User avatar
matte30is
Gimme' head till I'm dead
Posts: 2920
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:22 am
Location: Adams College home of the Atoms

Post by matte30is »

I'd buy the twin. You can fix it and if you dont like it then you could flip it.
User avatar
mickie08
.
.
Posts: 6417
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Contact:

Post by mickie08 »

I'd probably skip the twin myself as you have a bandmaster and a deville. I'd build a Marshall to have a different sound. That, or buy/fix the twin, then sell the devill to build the marshall
They say great minds think alike....Sometimes we do too...
User avatar
filtercap
.
.
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:51 am
Location: the information coalmine

Post by filtercap »

If you like the Bandmaster sound just fine and aren't needing the Twin for its louder clean sondz, you could buy a standalone reverb unit kit instead of the Twin. Weber has verb unit kits, though it looks like they include tremolo circuitry that may be redundant for you. Other manufacturers might have similar kits without the trem. New-reissue Fender reverb units are expensive, but it looks like you get more control over the sound than just one knob.
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

the reissue fender reverb is kind of a ripoff. i've seen vintage units go for around $600, while a brand new reissue is like $400 and they don't even use the same tubes or circuit.
I am actually looking at a weber reverb kit. the "add-a-verb" seems like a cool deal. but even then, $300 bucks just for reverb. i'm just not sure.

but my bandmaster does sound amazing. especially at gigging volume. i really like the idea of having a tweed combo, though.

argh, this is why i never bothered to get much into amps, there's just too much stuff that i want.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

mickie08 wrote:I'd probably skip the twin myself as you have a bandmaster and a deville. I'd build a Marshall to have a different sound. That, or buy/fix the twin, then sell the devill to build the marshall
+1.

What can a Twin do that your Bandmaster can't? nothing.
User avatar
NickS
.
.
Posts: 13769
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:08 am
Location: Down at the end, round by a corner

Post by NickS »

Build!
Personal pronouns he/him
User avatar
Sublimedo
.
.
Posts: 2656
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:24 am
Location: SO CAL
Contact:

Post by Sublimedo »

Mike wrote:
mickie08 wrote:I'd probably skip the twin myself as you have a bandmaster and a deville. I'd build a Marshall to have a different sound. That, or buy/fix the twin, then sell the devill to build the marshall
+1.

What can a Twin do that your Bandmaster can't? nothing.
i third this as this is sort of the direction i'd like to take. definitely a tiny terror along the way.
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

Mike wrote:What can a Twin do that your Bandmaster can't?
reverb and clean headroom. i really want a good tube reverb and somehow it just makes more sense to spend $500-$600 on an amp than $400-$1000 on just reverb.

i'm beginning to think that the solution might be to buy some speakers and finish the cabinet i made for my bandmaster, then buy a weber "add-a-verb" kit, then sell my deville and come out close to even, and then take things from there.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

40 Watts isn't enough Clean headroom for you? I think Twins are pretty silly to be honest.

Anyway. Reverb is for fags - there I said it.
User avatar
filtercap
.
.
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:51 am
Location: the information coalmine

Post by filtercap »

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

For me, 40 watts is close to ideal for a Fender amp, because the volume level you need to deal with a moderately loud 4-piece band happens right where the amp starts to compress & overdrive.

By the same token, however, 40 watts from 2 6L6's isn't going to stay clean at volumes loud enough to balance with a moderately loud band, at least not with the power supply a Bandmaster has. Biasing tubes cooler and/or using lower-"mu" preamp tubes will give you cleans farther up the volume dial, but at the expense of overall volume. So the amp will break up later but the cleans won't be much louder if louder at all.

Basically, if you took a 40-Watt Fender and start upgrading things to get your cleans louder with less saturation, you'd wind up putting in bigger transformers, 2 more power tubes, and if you have 10-inch speakers switch to 12-inch speakers or add more 10's. You'd essentially end up with a Twin no matter what.
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

i love my bandmaster and have no plans on changing it. with my jaguar, it's the best sounding combination. possibly ever.
but i also like the idea of a really loud, clean amp with reverb. like the twin.
then again, i would also like to hear my bandmaster with outboard reverb as well. i guess there's just too much stuff to get.
i'm starting to see how mike could cut down to just one guitar, while focusing more on amps. that never made sense to me before.
User avatar
Will
Up on his Whore Lore
Posts: 5328
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:40 am
Location: MADTOWN RAT 2011

Post by Will »

Twins are a pain in the ass to carry around. To my mind, they're the type of amp a venue or rehearsal space would have on wheels in a closet for use in-house. loading one into and out of a car, up stairs, on to a stage will make playing miserable.

I say get a reverb pedal like the Holy Grail (or even a behringer) and see if reverb is really important to you.
User avatar
filtercap
.
.
Posts: 493
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:51 am
Location: the information coalmine

Post by filtercap »

bubbles_horwitz wrote:i love my bandmaster and have no plans on changing it. with my jaguar, it's the best sounding combination. possibly ever.
Naw, I was just hoping to illustrate to certain members :wink: how, while hefty, a Twin isn't overkill if you need to break through the clean-volume ceiling of a 40-watt two-6L6 Fender. If one were to put together the components needed to break thru that ceiling, they'd inevitably end up with something very much like a Twin, with all the weight and bulk that implies.

They are a pain to move around, but so are Vox AC30s and many giggable bass rigs. An Ampeg tube bass head weighs a dozen pounds more than a Twin. You just figure out the best way to lift and carry one, and you're good. Wheels are a big help, whether casters or a dolly. A 70's silverface probably has sockets for snap-in casters underneath. Mine does.

+1 on the try-a-reverb-pedal idea. Not the same coolness factor as a mechanical reverb, but see what your ears think.

Also, if you're building a cab anyway, you might squeeze more volume (hence more clean volume) out of your Bandmaster by loading it with more efficient speakers if possible. Check the "sensitivity" ratings on spec sheets, and look for speakers rated at 100dB or more.
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

the cab i'm making for my bandmaster is a 3x10". i was just gonna put in jensen ceramics because they're cheap and jensen is the pre-anglicized version of my last name. i guess that second one is kinda stupid, but whatever. i'm not at a point where i really wanna go nuts with speaker options.

i've tried various reverb pedals including dddave's holier grail, and they sound good, but just don't have that warm tube and huge surfy sound that i like.