hollow body feedback

Guitar techniques, music theory, recording and anything to do with actually playing your guitar

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

hollow body feedback

Post by robert(original) »

ok, tracy will not give up her hollow body ways, i can't blame her, it sounds great and plays great.
up until recently i was letting her use my big muff turned down a bit for the distorted stuff.
but recently she grabbed me super overdrive plugged it in and after about 3 hours she said she wanted one for herself(great.....)
only problem is..... the feedback from a full sized hollow body.
she has the settings that she wants all that jazz.
so my general question is.
besides stuffing the thing full of linens, does anyone have any ideas on how to cut back on the vibration/feedback?
i told her to suck it up and play a solid body, and then she told me to suck it up and fix it since im the "luthier"
i digressed and agreed.
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post by Sloan »

you gotta just rock the feedback.
User avatar
analogsystem
.
.
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by analogsystem »

so the big muff didn't feedback but the super overdrive did?

tell her to stand as far from the amp as possible and not use much more than a mild overdrive......or else get a semi-hollow like a 335 with the center block.
Johno
.
.
Posts: 1933
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:49 am
Location: East London

Post by Johno »

There is a company that sells plugs for the F holes on the internet. Its basically black rubber shaped to fit the hole :D you could prolly do it yourself. Back in the day people used to stuff them with paper. The pups wax potted?
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Stuff it with cotton or foam, cover the F holes from the back.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

the big muff had the sustain turned all the way down and basically just created some crunch, but the boss sd-1 gives it a GREAT sound but even with being 15 feet away from the amp its still uncontrolable.
the pups are deffinitly waxed up,
they are low output washburn humbuckers.
the f-hole feedbackbuster is something that i would be into getting,
stuffing a full sized hollow body full of linen/paper/ whatever would take forever, and plus the electronics are not taped to the top, so knowing my luck i would rip something loose.
More Cowbell
.
.
Posts: 6206
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Jefferson, GA

Post by More Cowbell »

Do they make a feedback destroyer type of pedal? One that would attenuate the frequency that is causing the feedback? :idea:
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by Hurb »

The behringer noise reducer would be an easy option to kill the feedbacks.
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

altho does it kill some of the dynamics?
i know i tried one once with my ds-1 and i remember thinking that it just made everything sound like it was comming thru a tube.
its wasn't a berhinger tho.
(did you get paid to say that?)
User avatar
Al_
.
.
Posts: 513818
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Vista, CA

Post by Al_ »

Not sure about the noise reducer. I've got a feedback destroyer I used to use on the PA, but after about 45 mins of playing through it it would end up sucking all the high end frequencies out. Might do better on a guitar amp; though I'd make sure you could take it back.
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

I use an Archtop (Epiphone Emperor Regent) with the Tom Waits thing I play on. I'd usually be using my Marshall halfstack with it, but manage to get away without much feedback.

I've done all the obvious things, like stuff it with toilet roll and I put a folded ujp sock behind the bridge.

It's still pretty bad if I'm in front of the amp, but you sort of learn to get used to it. It's definitely not like playing a regular electric, I always have to think about where my right hand is, and how I can damp the strings to stop the feedback, without losing the nice droning open strings that guitarist love.

I find that certain notes in certain places will feedback like mad. Sort of, harmonically live notes, like octaves at the twelfth fret, or playing at the seventh fret will do it. Also, you should try to avoid notes that are going to be sympathetic with open strings, so don't play a G (say, the tenth fret on the A string) whilst the G string is left unmuted. This sort of feedback will also happen with notes that are a fifth apart, or a fourth.

I think it's sort of unavoidable, but by changing your technique you can make things a lot easier for yourself.
Image
More Cowbell
.
.
Posts: 6206
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Jefferson, GA

Post by More Cowbell »

Your guitar should start to gradually feedback when your remove your hand from the guitar strings, this would be normal. But for it to squeal uncontrollably is not. FEEDBACK IS FUN.
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post by Sloan »

Fill the f-holes with boners.
























:?:
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by Hurb »

robert(original) wrote:altho does it kill some of the dynamics?
i know i tried one once with my ds-1 and i remember thinking that it just made everything sound like it was comming thru a tube.
its wasn't a berhinger tho.
(did you get paid to say that?)
haha no :lol:
Actually to be fair the noise reducer does stop microphonic feedback..but I cant be certain that it would stop feedback from a hollow body..it should though.
The pedal I have doesn't effect tone no. just make sure you put it after fuzz, but before delays. and it is koolio.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Tell her you fixed the guitar, and in secret, pull the knob off the gain dial on the Boss, and put it back on but bit higher. Same setting = less gain = less feedback, and I bet you she won't notice!

WIN WIN WIN
More Cowbell
.
.
Posts: 6206
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Jefferson, GA

Post by More Cowbell »

Doog wrote:Tell her you fixed the guitar, and in secret, pull the knob off the gain dial on the Boss, and put it back on but bit higher. Same setting = less gain = less feedback, and I bet you she won't notice!

WIN WIN WIN
This idea works wonders! Our bass player used to always complain he couldn't hear himself and would always crank his volume up and be overbearingly loud. So after practice one time I pulled the volume knob off and clocked it forward so it looked like it was cranked up, and he never noticed, in fact he rolled the knob back some because he claimed he didn't want to be "diming" his amp all the time. :lol: He is going deaf, he never wears earplugs and he's been in loud bands for 12yrs. That is the real reason he can't hear what he plays. :wink:
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

yeah.... i guess that could work, im gonna let her play on the fender blender for tonights practice.
let her figure something out.