How is this mix?

Guitar techniques, music theory, recording and anything to do with actually playing your guitar

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

How is this mix?

Post by Ian »

http://www.myspace.com/ianshanetyler

Listen to the first song.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

It sounds like it would work fairly well if you turned the vocals down a hell of a lot. It's hard to get a feel for the balance of everything else with the vocal so loud, but it seems ok underneath.
Shabba.
User avatar
Ninja Mike 808
.
.
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
Location: DFW
Contact:

Post by Ninja Mike 808 »

James wrote:It sounds like it would work fairly well if you turned the vocals down a hell of a lot. It's hard to get a feel for the balance of everything else with the vocal so loud, but it seems ok underneath.
Agreed. I would also add that I might've heard a lotta midrange, which I would cut. Or maybe boost some low treble on the guitars. The kick could also use more slap, and the hi hats could also be turned up...
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

What is that distortin effect on the guitar?
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Maybe a bit more focus of low mids on the bass and roll some of the lows off- when I turn my sub down, the bass pretty much dissapears. I'd favour a little more snare too, but that's just personal really.

Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.

I like how the other guitars fade out for the start of the solo.

As always- chuck a 192kbps mp3 up for proper listenz, myspace sucks the life out of stuff.
User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

Post by Ian »

Thanks guys!

The Distortion is from a Naylor head.

The solo is using a flange/delay effect with the same sound.

The octaves at the end are a mesa boogie mark II head (Like the blue album)

I sent you an email with the mix doog
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

When did you get a Mark II head? TAKE A PHOTO NOWWWWWWWW!

Mix sounds a bit better at a higher quality, dude. I'd definately put a bit more low mids/upper low end in the bass though- it'll definately make the mix a bit fuller sounding and help the bass not get lost on less rumbly hi-fi setups.
User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

Post by Ian »

It sounds just like the blue album sounds. Especially with my P90'd SG.

I've had it for a good half a year now. I'll take some pics, its sweet.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Doog wrote:Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.
For serious? I can hardy hear anything else.
Shabba.
User avatar
Ninja Mike 808
.
.
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
Location: DFW
Contact:

Post by Ninja Mike 808 »

James wrote:
Doog wrote:Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.
For serious? I can hardy hear anything else.
What's the difference between ya'lls monitoring situation?
User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

Post by Ian »

maybe his speakers are out of phase or something haha.
User avatar
Ninja Mike 808
.
.
Posts: 1643
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
Location: DFW
Contact:

Post by Ninja Mike 808 »

Ian wrote:maybe his speakers are out of phase or something haha.
hehe, well, if there's a boost in certain areas it can make vocals that aren't that much louder, seem way louder. Or maybe, they're flatter, so, possibly everything could sound duller. I'm speaking in theory, of course, I'd bet that they both have great speakers.
User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

Post by Ian »

I definitely have the vocals mixed more pop than rock. But they aren't TOO loud.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

James wrote:
Doog wrote:Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.
For serious? I can hardy hear anything else.
Are you listening on crappy uppermidrangetastic pc speakers perchance?

Image

The Siroccos never lie!

Listen to anything pop-rock mainstream alongside Ian's track, it doesn't sound any more vocal-heavy really.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Doog wrote:
James wrote:
Doog wrote:Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.
For serious? I can hardy hear anything else.
Are you listening on crappy uppermidrangetastic pc speakers perchance?

Image

The Siroccos never lie!

Listen to anything pop-rock mainstream alongside Ian's track, it doesn't sound any more vocal-heavy really.
From my soundcard into my Hi-Fi amp and then into Hi-Fi speakers.

I don't really listen to this sort of soft pop rock stuff so I guess I'm not that familiar with the mix style and how loud the vocals actually are. I listened on headphones too, and to me they're uncomfortably loud. But if it's what Ian's aiming for, I guess he's done it alright.
Shabba.
User avatar
Ian
.
.
Posts: 555
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Location: What do?

Post by Ian »

I just got called soft pop rock


:shock:

word.
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post by Sloan »

I finally got around to listening, I just started. No problem with the vocal level for me. Very radio-friendly vocals.
It's hard to critique mixes on myspace, but this sounds pretty good so far, lots of bass, but that's good for modern stuff, rite?

Sonds fine.
JamesSmann
.
.
Posts: 11873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by JamesSmann »

Doog wrote:
James wrote:
Doog wrote:Vocals down a bit I guess too, but they're hardly ridiculously loud- it's a very "pop" kind of mix.
For serious? I can hardy hear anything else.
Are you listening on crappy uppermidrangetastic pc speakers perchance?

Image

The Siroccos never lie!

Listen to anything pop-rock mainstream alongside Ian's track, it doesn't sound any more vocal-heavy really.
where did you get those? what did they cost? are they really super good style?
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Handmedowns from my hi-fi fixated Dad (just bought a tube hi-fi amp :roll:) , used to be used on his main home work PC. I've actually got a previous model, only has controls for volume, amount of sub volume and "Attitude" which is more or less a treble/upper mids control.

Love 'em to bits, I've had zero problems and they sound great. The speakers and amp all have proper sprung terminals and beefy cables, so you'd be hard pushed to fuck it up. Very cool for mixing/mastering, since you can disconnect the main speakers and just listen to how the sub reacts, compared some "pro" recording, or just turn the sub down to listen to the mids and highs.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Ian wrote:I just got called soft pop rock


:shock:

word.
Well, it certainly ain't hard rock. Maybe "maliable rock". Or "porous".