gfs p-90's
Moderated By: mods
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
- analogsystem
- .
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:02 pm
- Location: Seattle
I put a GFS "Dream 90" in the neck of a tele and I could not take it out fast enough! It sounded so generic and mediocre. I sent it back to GFS and they sent me a "Dream 180" which has sat in the parts drawer ever since.
I have heard good things about Kent Armstrong for cheap pups, GFS is really hit or miss.
I have heard good things about Kent Armstrong for cheap pups, GFS is really hit or miss.
yea, sloan I'd really like to hear what you think of the of the mean 90. from what I've read people say the dream 90 is muddy and not that great and the mean 90 is even more so. I've read the kent armstrong one is more jangly like a real p90. but hey, I have not heard any of these pickups with my own ears, this is just what I've read. so It'll be great to get a opinion from a knowledgeable person such as yourself
btw, the kent armstrongs are on macdaddy music for $50
http://www.macdaddymusicstore.com/servl ... Categories
btw, the kent armstrongs are on macdaddy music for $50
http://www.macdaddymusicstore.com/servl ... Categories
All I really have for comparison is an Epiphone SG Jr that I played for almost a year. It was my friend's and I loved it. Tried to buy it off him, but he didn't want to get rid of it.
A lot of people were talking about the increased low-end that the GFS p-90 pickups have and that's really my only worry since my Artcore is already what I would call "muddy" or "undefined" or whatever. Going from the stock humbucker to a p-90 style pickup should be noticable change, but we'll see. I'm not sure what pot values are normally used with a p-90, but I suspect this may be one of the reasons people think it's muddy if they just change the pickup and not the pots etc...
Thanks for the link to that cheaper Kent Armstrong p-90. If I don't like the GFS, I may give that a shot if I have any monies...
A lot of people were talking about the increased low-end that the GFS p-90 pickups have and that's really my only worry since my Artcore is already what I would call "muddy" or "undefined" or whatever. Going from the stock humbucker to a p-90 style pickup should be noticable change, but we'll see. I'm not sure what pot values are normally used with a p-90, but I suspect this may be one of the reasons people think it's muddy if they just change the pickup and not the pots etc...
Thanks for the link to that cheaper Kent Armstrong p-90. If I don't like the GFS, I may give that a shot if I have any monies...
Just put the Mean 90 in the Artcore.
Here are some samples of Guitar > Epiphone Valve Jr > Layfayette cab with old 60's organ speakers.
Stock Humbucker:
http://bestnetworx.com/uploader/files/5 ... dgehum.mp3
Mean 90:
http://bestnetworx.com/uploader/files/52/gfs_mean90.mp3
Mean 90 with more drive:
http://bestnetworx.com/uploader/files/5 ... rdrive.mp3
^ I play an out of tune C chord to demonstrate how it cleans up with a light touch.
Click-clack for pictars of HOW IT'S DONE!!!
► Show Spoiler
yea, that sounds pretty good. not nearly as bad as all those harmony central dimwits made it out to be. what is the output like? my epiphone dot has a retainer clip that holds the wires back too. you can reach in there and bend it open to pull the wires out to work on it and bend it back when you put them back.
I wonder how that pickup would sound without the metal cover...
I wonder how that pickup would sound without the metal cover...
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
Pretty much smack bang on my experience with the mean 90. Muddy stock artcore pickup > replaced with mean 90 > much brighter and snappier > weird sounding middle.
I haven't tried anything with the middle position yet since I only ever use the bridge pickup on the artcore as the neck is knee deep in mud.
I haven't tried anything with the middle position yet since I only ever use the bridge pickup on the artcore as the neck is knee deep in mud.