Thats its correct term. The Jaguars from the US that are available now are AmaericanVintageReIssue (AVRI) as are the Jazzmasters. The first run are AV. The Mustang has never been reissued from America.Mike wrote:Don't call it that.Fran wrote:only the original AV (american vintage)
what is it about the jag-stang neck
Moderated By: mods
dont call it thatFran wrote:Thats its correct term. The Jaguars from the US that are available now are AmaericanVintageReIssue (AVRI) as are the Jazzmasters. The first run are AV. The Mustang has never been reissued from America.Mike wrote:Don't call it that.Fran wrote:only the original AV (american vintage)
I don't know, I don't care, all I know is you can take me there
Sryrobroe wrote:what exactly are you trying to say with your post?
its just two identical jagstang necks from different years if you don't point out whats not the same
(I was going to edit that post)
Even though they look the same, I found the 96' a little thinner than the 02'. The 96 feels Mosrite like thin IMO. Very comfy to play, even more so than the already comfy 02'
I just think there are a few inconsistencies. Paint being another one. I think there is a slight difference in shades on the Sonic Blue Jagstang.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
It's not the correct term. The correct term would be simply "Vintage" or "1965". AV has never and will never be a term for the initial 60s and 70s guitars Fender produced.Fran wrote:Thats its correct term. The Jaguars from the US that are available now are AmaericanVintageReIssue (AVRI) as are the Jazzmasters. The first run are AV. The Mustang has never been reissued from America.Mike wrote:Don't call it that.Fran wrote:only the original AV (american vintage)
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
jag-stang necks are not the same as jaguar necks nor mustang necks
i thought they were but i measured the hell out of my 96 jaguar neck and my 96 jag-stang neck and found that they were slightly different but enough to take notes of.
and when i bought tracy her comp blue mustang a few years ago i remember doing a profile of the back and it was slightly "rounder" than my j.s.
i thought that they would all be exactly the same but there is enough of one to say that they are not the same.
i thought they were but i measured the hell out of my 96 jaguar neck and my 96 jag-stang neck and found that they were slightly different but enough to take notes of.
and when i bought tracy her comp blue mustang a few years ago i remember doing a profile of the back and it was slightly "rounder" than my j.s.
i thought that they would all be exactly the same but there is enough of one to say that they are not the same.
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
Vintage maybe, for now.Mike wrote:It's not the correct term. The correct term would be simply "Vintage" or "1965". AV has never and will never be a term for the initial 60s and 70s guitars Fender produced.Fran wrote:Thats its correct term. The Jaguars from the US that are available now are AmaericanVintageReIssue (AVRI) as are the Jazzmasters. The first run are AV. The Mustang has never been reissued from America.Mike wrote: Don't call it that.
So whats your verdict rob? Say it! Dont skip around the pool... jump in!
im just trying to point out that the fretboards are OBVIOUSLY DIFFERENT. look at how the 65 bows out at the end and the compstang curves in.
your hand wraps around the fretboard too, its part of the neck. therefor if the fretboards are different, the feel of the neck is going to be different too
your hand wraps around the fretboard too, its part of the neck. therefor if the fretboards are different, the feel of the neck is going to be different too
Last edited by robroe on Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dots wrote:incesticide
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
Yeah, i'd just got home, just about to open it then i saw your annoying post. So...
Looks great dude! Its size is awesome! Better than i had hoped, really board-friendly and colour is ace.
I was desperate for this, mine packed in last week so i will be using it at rehearsal tomorrow night and i will give it a blast tonight as well.
Looks great dude! Its size is awesome! Better than i had hoped, really board-friendly and colour is ace.
I was desperate for this, mine packed in last week so i will be using it at rehearsal tomorrow night and i will give it a blast tonight as well.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
Wicked. Glad it got there OK, you'll have to let me know how it goes at practise and stuff, I'm sure you'll like the sounds, it sounds huge to me.Fran wrote:Yeah, i'd just got home, just about to open it then i saw your annoying post. So...
Looks great dude! Its size is awesome! Better than i had hoped, really board-friendly and colour is ace.
I was desperate for this, mine packed in last week so i will be using it at rehearsal tomorrow night and i will give it a blast tonight as well.
Don't forget to bring the Black one to Doogfest, I should be able to fix it. For free of course.
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
Nice one.Mike wrote:Wicked. Glad it got there OK, you'll have to let me know how it goes at practise and stuff, I'm sure you'll like the sounds, it sounds huge to me.Fran wrote:Yeah, i'd just got home, just about to open it then i saw your annoying post. So...
Looks great dude! Its size is awesome! Better than i had hoped, really board-friendly and colour is ace.
I was desperate for this, mine packed in last week so i will be using it at rehearsal tomorrow night and i will give it a blast tonight as well.
Don't forget to bring the Black one to Doogfest, I should be able to fix it. For free of course.
- Armchair Bronco
- .
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:26 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
this is from a few months ago.
i compared a 96 j.s. neck and a 96 jaguar neck.
so in theory they should be exactly the same right?
same factory, same year, similer marks on the neck, i don't remember the serial number on the jag but they were the same damn thing.
except....
the profile is different.
i compared a 96 j.s. neck and a 96 jaguar neck.
so in theory they should be exactly the same right?
same factory, same year, similer marks on the neck, i don't remember the serial number on the jag but they were the same damn thing.
except....
the profile is different.
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest