Artec onboard effects

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
aphasiac
.
.
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: London, UK

Artec onboard effects

Post by aphasiac »

niiiiice - never seen these before

Image

Image

Image

http://stores.ebay.com/GUITAR-FUEL-PERF ... idZ2QQtZkm

the active boost is kinda sexy, also the 5-way active EQ (QDD) cos it has a METALZ setting! someone buy one and stick it in, ah go on they're cheap as chips.
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

Artec make the Guitarfetish Modboards as well.
Image
euan
User avatar
aphasiac
.
.
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by aphasiac »

never heard of them before, so looked them up:

http://store.guitarfetish.com/modboards.html

sorry but thats totally retarded - no phaser or fuzz? FFS, who wants an onboard delay or trem?!! anyway the Artec boosters are cooler cos they require no modding of the guitar - should fit nicely in your tone/volume route.
mezzio13
GOODmin
Posts: 14632
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:20 am
Location: Center of the Universe
Contact:

Post by mezzio13 »

euan wrote:Artec make the Guitarfetish Modboards as well.
And GFS pups.
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

Yeah that too but we weren't talking about pickups.

There is a possibility that Artec make SD Far East pickups and some from other names too.
Image
euan
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

I had a similar thing on my Man Strat. They are limited but definitely usefull if used in the right context.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

A friend of mine has a G&L strat-thing with an active boost. It made every pedal sound like complete shite.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

They do work better with valve amps than into pedals. I had active EMG's and onboard Fuzz going into 2 x Big Muffs and it was like WTF?
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

aphasiac wrote:
sorry but thats totally retarded - no phaser or fuzz? FFS, who wants an onboard delay or trem?!!
Uhm, a lot of people I'd think- trem and delay being time-based effects, having them at your finger tips would be pretty great, spesh for delay time-tweak freakouts.

That said, I wouldn't want them at the start of my chain.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Doog wrote:
aphasiac wrote:
sorry but thats totally retarded - no phaser or fuzz? FFS, who wants an onboard delay or trem?!!
Uhm, a lot of people I'd think- trem and delay being time-based effects, having them at your finger tips would be pretty great, spesh for delay time-tweak freakouts.

That said, I wouldn't want them at the start of my chain.
Yeah, delay at the start of your FX chain is completely unacceptable. I've never known it work that way. But saying that, these are like micro effects for subtle effect, not your standard stomper affair. I imagine working with a clean amp would give the best results.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

It can work- I'm pretty certain East Bay Ray had his Echoplex/Copycat (?) before his amp gain, you can hear the repeats get less distorted as they fade out on stuff like Police Truck.

But yeah, you're somewhat limited and lose the spacious swirlings a properly-placed delay can give youse.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Them old echo units were a different beast though doog. I had a Carlsbro model the size of an amp head that consumed anything in its path, i tried the wem copycats out and they were much weaker (unless the tape had deteriorated.. i dunno). Police Truck! What a song.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Yeah, true enough- the guitarist in my 3 piece jerky punk band messes around with a WEM Copycat in practise sometimes and that thing is noisy and fuzzy as fook, even in the FX loop. Think the tape is just so worn out, it's just wooly as anything.
User avatar
aphasiac
.
.
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by aphasiac »

Doog wrote: Uhm, a lot of people I'd think- trem and delay being time-based effects, having them at your finger tips would be pretty great, spesh for delay time-tweak freakouts.
meh, guess it's ok for the noisemakers. but for the other 99% of guitar players, tap-tempo is a good enough solution.

just seems an odd choice of effects to intigrate - not that useful considering how much you have you cut up your axe.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

THIS IS OLD FUCKING NEWS
User avatar
aphasiac
.
.
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by aphasiac »

Mike wrote:THIS IS OLD FUCKING NEWS
i had a search but couldnt find anything on here.

link to old thread??
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

aphasiac wrote:
just seems an odd choice of effects to intigrate - not that useful considering how much you have you cut up your axe.
I'd sooner carve up a guitar for something like a built in delay rather than some boringass FUZZ sound..
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

Basically he wants to Bellamy himself.
Image
euan
User avatar
aphasiac
.
.
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by aphasiac »

damn straight.

You have ONE famous guitarist (Bellamy) who uses integrated effects (fuzz and phaser), and they decide not to include those. odd decision - these kits oare freaking DESIGNED for Muse fanboys!
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

aphasiac wrote: no phaser or fuzz? FFS, who wants an onboard delay or trem?!!
The same kind of people who'd want an onboard phaser or fuzz.
Bellamy didn't invent onboard effects, he's just one of the more famous people who uses them. I have no idea how an onboard phaser is cool and an onboard tremolo is "retarded". You'd think the more effects they offer on these things the happier people would be, but no. Bellamy never had one, why does it even exist?
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"