Korean SHO clone kit & moar...
Moderated By: mods
I though Zvex was quite quick on issuing IP takedown notices on schematics regarding clones of his pedals?euan wrote:ZVex would struggle in any court with IP or copyright. The only thing he has a leg on is his branding and name.
You certainly can't buy any clones or kits on ebay, and even discuss them on HC or the Muse forum.
- euan
- partynerd!
- Posts: 27589
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan
The is general moderation. He asks moderators of forums not to allow it. Freestompboxes open discuss and dissect his pedals and ignored his threats. If you were selling a circuit which was basically a Fuzz Factory there is very little he could do. He can protect his trademark but can do very little about the actual circuits.aphasiac wrote:I though Zvex was quite quick on issuing IP takedown notices on schematics regarding clones of his pedals?euan wrote:ZVex would struggle in any court with IP or copyright. The only thing he has a leg on is his branding and name.
You certainly can't buy any clones or kits on ebay, and even discuss them on HC or the Muse forum.
Case example being when Behringer released all their Boss clones. The only thing Boss could do was sue them over the copying of cases, so Behringer redesigned them.
euan
Seriously, with the mystery around this pedal for years I am dying to see the schem to know how it is different from the AMZ Mosfet Boost.PenPen wrote:Is there a schematic of the SHO on that site? I can't read gibberish.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
He said it started as that circuit, but always hinted that he changed something in it. I want to know what it was. I've built my own variants of that circuit and want to know how close I got to the legendary SHO.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
-
- .
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:30 am
Dude, if people could sue for making a variant of another pedal circuit there would be nothing out there but Dist+, Rangemasters, and Fuzz Faces. Everything, and I do mean everything, is based on some very very very basic designs.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
They're almost identical - if I remember correctly, the only change is upping the 2.2M input resistor on the MOSFET.PenPen wrote:Seriously, with the mystery around this pedal for years I am dying to see the schem to know how it is different from the AMZ Mosfet Boost.PenPen wrote:Is there a schematic of the SHO on that site? I can't read gibberish.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/M ... ockdc1.png
There's one on the back end as the switchable boost.
There's one on the back end as the switchable boost.
BMP is just three cascaded amplifier stages. It's basically three tweaked Rangemaster circuits in series. The only "new" think about it is the tone circuit, but I'm sure some amp maker did the same thing before the BMP. So that I would put under the "Rangemaster-derived" basket.euan wrote:And the BMP.PenPen wrote:Dude, if people could sue for making a variant of another pedal circuit there would be nothing out there but Dist+, Rangemasters, and Fuzz Faces. Everything, and I do mean everything, is based on some very very very basic designs.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
Mike wrote:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/M ... ockdc1.png
There's one on the back end as the switchable boost.
Thanks. I'll have to compare this to my "Boots" pedal schem.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now