Les Paul Project

Painting? Routing? Set-up tips? Or just straight-up making a guitar from scratch? Post here, and post pics!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
ElCapitan
.
.
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Somerset, UK

Les Paul Project

Post by ElCapitan »

Image
This fine specimen is a Hondo II Les Paul copy. I'm not sure how old it is, but I believe these began being made under the Hondo II name in 1979. My friend's guitar teacher found it in a skip(!) and eventually it was handed to me as neither of them could be bothered to fix it up. I substituted a wraparound bridge for a tailpiece I found among my friend's collection of parts purely for simplicity at the moment. The pickup it came with is incredibly microphonic, literally in fact, as when my amp is up high enough I can shout in to the pickups, sonic youth style. It's very squealy and noisy, which I quite like. The pickup ring is from Zaphod, thank you again btw. At some point I guess I should put in a neck pickup purely for aesthetics as I hardly ever use the neck pup anyway. I put in a new jack as the original was busted, and 2 new tuners care of Fran, again thank you. It also needed a complete rewire to stop all the buzzing and hissing and such. It is now playable to a certain degree, although the action is almost painfully high on the 12th fret and above, I guess I'll need to shim or something. At the moment this is my only playable guitar as my Jag-Stang is waiting for a setup and my other partsocasters in works in progress.

Image
Image
iCEByTes wrote:now start drools please
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

that thing looks pretty cool. altho the lack of binding and blocks almost makes it look like an entirely different guitar.
User avatar
Will
Up on his Whore Lore
Posts: 5328
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:40 am
Location: MADTOWN RAT 2011

Post by Will »

Groovey - don't get rid of those microphonic PUPs. It's really hard to find anything microphonic these days - total shame. I always felt they just sounded more alive.
User avatar
DGNR8
.
.
Posts: 4220
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:51 am
Location: DC Area

Post by DGNR8 »

Good deal. I almost bought an LP "Teh Paul II" named after pope. The guy made an appointment with me and then made another one right before me. What a choad. I decided before he called back that I was no longer interested. I would have had to monkey with it to make it do bad things.
Yell Like Hell
User avatar
ElCapitan
.
.
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Somerset, UK

Post by ElCapitan »

I'm still not entirely happy with it, it plays wonderfully up to about the 7th fret, then it's all buzzy and high. Also this thing has nooooo sustain. It's almost shameful for a les paul. Despite all that, considering it was in a skip and at least 20 years old it's manageable. The hardest thing is to think of a decent name for it. "Les Paul" is much less flexible than "-caster".
iCEByTes wrote:now start drools please
User avatar
Fibus
.
.
Posts: 553
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 1:15 pm
Location: Limerick, Ireland

Post by Fibus »

Home-les Paul?

Nice job rescuing it by the way. The need a show on discover like animal rescue but where people rescue old guitars and do them up like this. I think it would be class.
Image
User avatar
plopswagon
cutesy tag
Posts: 18906
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: 3rd Fret
Contact:

Post by plopswagon »

That was my second guitar only in white. Plywood body baby!
► Show Spoiler
ekwatts wrote: Wed Dec 21, 2022 12:53 pm The word "moisty" has made me irrationally angry.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

That's newer than the 1981 Les Mike I gave Shad, which has a standard tailpiece and tuneomatic setup.
User avatar
Mr.Ripley
.
.
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Boken

Post by Mr.Ripley »

I saw the second pic and said to myself that it needed wide range p/ups t'would be badarse in my opinion.
User avatar
ElCapitan
.
.
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: Somerset, UK

Post by ElCapitan »

You maybe right there Ripley. They're bigger than normal buckers though aren't they?
iCEByTes wrote:now start drools please
User avatar
Mr.Ripley
.
.
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Boken

Post by Mr.Ripley »

Yes, but it just oozes the need to have slightly larger better sounding p/ups. It just looked to me that they would fit without looking cramped