I tried the combo out the other day, and was kind of disappointed, to be honest. I think it had more to do with the fact that it was pointed at my knees though.
I only used the Clean channel (this only had two, Clean and OD1, I think), but was impressed by how much gain I could get out of just that, and how useable it was.
It wasn't really that the amp disappointed me, it was more that I was getting great sounds from it, then I'd change soething, and it would sound shit. i need a good sut down with it.
aen wrote:I reeeeeally get along with it. My wife said the other day she really liked the tone. More than my telecaster. WTF?
it definitely has a unique "tone." the swimming pool style route makes it like a semi-semi-hollow. it actually has a decent amount of unamplified output.
Mines not so semi hollow anymore. What with the fuzz and the battery nad extra swich and pots. and my stash.
I thinking of getting a a duosonic (new or old one, what i can get my hands on), the problem is i need a guitar with a tremolo. Would it be hard to put a mustang bridge/tremolo on a duosonic? i won't have money for a mustang for a long time...
BacchusPaul wrote:I would have thought so. I shte body even deep enough? Aren't the Duosonics thinner than Mustangs?
I thought the bodys were the same, but i don't shit about this kind of thing. I did saw an old duosonic with mustang bridge, but i think it was a vintage one (it used to belong to thurston moore)
aen wrote:I reeeeeally get along with it. My wife said the other day she really liked the tone. More than my telecaster. WTF?
it definitely has a unique "tone." the swimming pool style route makes it like a semi-semi-hollow. it actually has a decent amount of unamplified output.
This one gets to stay in SS family.Serfx will be the new owner...
