Robert(original) Duo-Sonic II Demo Video

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Robert(original) Duo-Sonic II Demo Video

Post by Mike »

[youtube][/youtube]

BAM.
User avatar
ultraviolence
.
.
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:26 pm
Location: Montreal QC

Post by ultraviolence »

sounds pretty good, but the video doesn't seem as good quality as your mustang demo?
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

The video quality changes for some reason, my camera is a POS. The audio is the same though, SM57 close mic'd audio.
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by Hurb »

FUCKIN YEAH! I know how much you wanted this project done mike. And your glee is amazing.
Mustang/duosonic the new mike guitar! fuck some tele's
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Hurb wrote:Mustang/duosonic the new mike guitar! fuck some tele's
It's the future.

Watch this space but the Telecaster is very, very annoyed at me at the moment. First I sell it's friend and now it's flanked by two shortscales.
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

ah, you can't beat an ash body for a bit of neck beef. or you can, probably, but it still sounds top hole!
Image
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

Some viscious twang there.
User avatar
astro
.
.
Posts: 1765
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Montreal

Post by astro »

Sounds immense!

What kind of pickups did you stick in there?

How cool would it have been if Fender/Squier would have put out a Duo 2 with these features instead of the faux 50's one they released?
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

They were just CIJ '69 pickups I bought from The 'Burbz, a fellow shortscaler. I was mainly interested in them for the covers, but I like them plenty. I see no reason to change at the moment - sure they're low gain, and sure they're both fucking IDENTICAL (5.78K) because fender are knobs but they sound good to my ears, I'll know more when I play with the band next week.
User avatar
MaMo
.
.
Posts: 972
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: San Francisco,CA
Contact:

Post by MaMo »

astro wrote: How cool would it have been if Fender/Squier would have put out a Duo 2 with these features instead of the faux 50's one they released?
My thoughts exactly. Nothing against the classic duo, but the Duo II is far to dope to not have some sort of reissue.
scandoslav wrote:i heard these are wank when it comes to metal
RUN AMOK!.
JamesSmann
.
.
Posts: 11873
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by JamesSmann »

you need to stop cussing so much.


lol

just fuckin' kidding.

i also like hearing you say things are "immense" in IRL. it makes me realize you post like you talk, ng.
User avatar
astro
.
.
Posts: 1765
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:04 pm
Location: Montreal

Post by astro »

Mike wrote:They were just CIJ '69 pickups I bought from The 'Burbz, a fellow shortscaler. I was mainly interested in them for the covers, but I like them plenty. I see no reason to change at the moment - sure they're low gain, and sure they're both fucking IDENTICAL (5.78K) because fender are knobs but they sound good to my ears, I'll know more when I play with the band next week.
Interesting... I hated the stock pickups in my '69 RI. They weren't in there long before I swapped them out. However, I'm starting to hate the new ones I put in (Lace Sensors), so maybe I should revisit the stock pickups to verify that I wasn't just being delusional in my hate.
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

that guitar looks so fucking sexy.
i love the decal placement, i think thats the best decal placement i have ever seen!
srsly! it sounds fucking b'dass.
if i ever make it accross the pond thats the 2nd guitar i want to play, the first being hurbs 69 jaggie baby so pretty.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Cheers man, I was proper scared of doing the decal as I was sure I'd fuck it up, but it went ok.

it's not absolutely perfect, since today I noticed after it's dried that if you look closely you can see a couple small bubbles in the light, but I don't really mind, I think considering what a cackhanded fool I am that it came out good. Thanks so much for the body, this piece of wood is glorious.

I can't stop looking at it, or playing it, and I can't wait to crank it with the band.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Most awesome, that's a thing of sexiness.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Sounds excellent Mike, beefs up well. Love the Pixies tonez 8)
User avatar
NickD
.
.
Posts: 6089
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:41 am
Location: Sheffield, Innit

Post by NickD »

Looks and sounds great 8) You should be proud of your (and Robert's) work.
User avatar
TideBleach
.
.
Posts: 178
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:09 am

Post by TideBleach »

sounds awesome and looks very well done. finish is pure epicness.
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

i really didn;t do much at all, and in fact made more work for him in the long run.
a.) i didn't factor in the difference in bridge height/ pocket dept
b.) the guard was more brown tort than red tort, altho it was 5 ply which looks kinda cool from an angle.
c.) i fuct up the neck placement, there is a small bit of wood putting the neck farther from the bridge than normal, but the guard covers it up.
so all in all, mike may have been able to do a better job if he cut the thing himself, in fact, im sure that he could have done a better job.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

I wouldn't know where to start. And the bridge height issue wasn't your problem, it was mine from the design perspective. I didn't think it through that a standard Mustang neck pocket wouldn't line up with a hardtail bridge. Also you couldn't just have made a more deep neckpocket anyway, we thought of that (and tried it), and what happens is that then the strings from the bridge make contact with the robroe covers unless they're flush with teh pickguard, which looks wank. We ended up putting back the wood we removed. It is cosmetically invisible as we did a careful job.

The spacers we put under the bridge work a treat and are practically invisible. You'd never know they were there unless I pointed it out. We need one more for it to be perfect but that's it.

The bit of wood in the neck pocket has never and would never be an issue, it's tiny and hidden by the scratch plate, it's a non issue.

As for the brown plate, I still have it and who knows, down the line it may get used if I change my mind or the finish of the guitar in the future. Regardless I won't sell it and I'm really happy with it, it's a fantastic piece of wood and it sounds great.