Now THAT'S how you use a shortscale...

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

Raist330
.
.
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Fake Tales of San Fran-cis-co

Now THAT'S how you use a shortscale...

Post by Raist330 »




Check out Tina's bass.

And as for Byrne...watch/listen closely around 4:21 into the vid.

'Stang or Duo? Looks an awful lot like my 65 RI.

A post of no consequence. Just thought I'd share.
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

i have a double live record that has a a load of pics (its like 77-87 or something like that)
but anywho.
there is a house part pic where you can see the guitar you speak of.
its a duo with a chrome bucker in the bridge.
and i think actually it might be a music master II
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

correction, its a duo
Raist330
.
.
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Fake Tales of San Fran-cis-co

Post by Raist330 »

Point taken. Thank you sir.

And I suppose my follow-up will paint me as some kind of sonic-neanderthal..

...but...

I own a 65 RI 'Stang.

I've tried out that HORRIBLE (what!?! it's an opinion!) GOLD Squier Duo reissue.

And I've never had the honor of futzing around with a genuine vintage Duosonic.

Question is:

Sound-wise...with AND without overdrive/distortion...

what really IS the difference between a DuoSonic and a Mustang?

Aside from the obvious COSMETIC quirks?
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

are you speaking in terms of re-issue's or vintage?
and what years of each?
there are like 3 different re-issue duo-sonics, maybe only two actually, but i think there are three.
and there are 3 different re-issue stangs.

and as far as vintage stuff, same sort of deal.
there are a couple differences between a 57 duo compared to a 65 duo(mainly finish options, pickguards, and scale length)
and with stangs there is a difference with colors, body styles, and i have felt a couple with insanely different feeling necks.
Raist330
.
.
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Fake Tales of San Fran-cis-co

Post by Raist330 »

Thanks for the info.

I guess my question was too broad. Will have to be more specific in the future.

But generally (and I DO mean GENERALLY) speaking...which is shriller/twangier? The Duo or the Stang?

I know, I know...define "shrill" and "twang" right? Well...I can't. All I know is that between my Strat (sold), my Tele and my Mustang, the Mustang sounds closest to the Beatlesque Rickenbacker sound I've always been after.

Sorry...does that make any sense?
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

well, you have to factor in scale length, string size and pickup type.
oh and the type of bridge.
and the electronics.
there are a million different factors.
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

Oh, damn dudes, I played that new duo, it felt like a fucking Katana. it had that awesome "brand new strings/brand new guitar" klannng! Bonars. Sounded just as good plugged in. The neck was bassy enough, but the whole thing had a great metallic edge to it. Dare I say Shellac-y?
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury