New Mustang ri

Post by **Mike** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:58 pm

Don't boast, it's incredibly unattractive.

MaMo · Post by **MaMo** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:03 pm

Mike wrote:Don't boast, it's incredibly unattractive.

lolz, but its tort on blue, Mike. What's not to like?

Post by **Mike** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:04 pm

Everything. If it's Tort then it's not original either.

MaMo · Post by **MaMo** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:07 pm

Mike wrote:Everything. If it's Tort then it's not original either.

I gots the og gaurd...may put it back on one day.

DGNR8 · Post by **DGNR8** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 7:12 pm

I wouldn't change a thing on that. Very nice.

Z*Z*Z · Post by **Z*Z*Z** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:45 pm

Nice one

landon · Post by **landon** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:08 am

the guitar is amazing quite an upgrade from the 69 reissues
completely different guitar
the neck pup is really really nice im keeping it stock
but im not so fond of the bridge pup
any bridge pup suggestions
think along the lines strat sized buckers

all post pictures when i can

rodvonbon · Post by **rodvonbon** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:19 am

landon wrote:any bridge pup suggestions
think along the lines strat sized buckers

Hotrail

robroe · Post by **robroe** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:32 am

DuckBucker
http://www.seymourduncan.com/products/e ... ckers_sdb/

robroe · Post by **robroe** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:33 am

i also want to try these active pickups called blackouts
http://www.seymourduncan.com/products/e ... uts_singl/

Bacchus · Post by **Bacchus** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:41 am

Active? So you'd have a mustang with a battery hole routed in the back?

MaMo · Post by **MaMo** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:32 pm

59'er

Post by **Mike** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:36 pm

Boo Buckers.

rodvonbon · Post by **rodvonbon** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:54 pm

Someone should link this to the "things Mike hates" thread :}

MaMo · Post by **MaMo** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:00 pm

Mike wrote:Boo Buckers.

Well, he can always try these then...Lindy Fralin

terronado · Post by **terronado** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:55 pm

back to the original topic: if it says "offset contour body" on the headstock, assuming it's the original neck, doesn't that mean it has a contour on the body? therefore a '69 RI?

MaMo · Post by **MaMo** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:57 pm

terronado wrote:back to the original topic: if it says "offset contour body" on the headstock, assuming it's the original neck, doesn't that mean it has a contour on the body? therefore a '69 RI?

Some necks have that sticker even though the body doesn't have contours. My neck is dated 65 B and has "offset contour body" on the headstock but hasn't a countour to speak of.

purplehaze19x · Post by **purplehaze19x** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:35 pm

^ +1 same here. neck heal read 8JUN65B and has a offset contour decal.
My other vintage stang neck reads 16MAR66B and doesnt have the contour decal. ?? i guess the just put them whereever and whenever

Post by **dots** » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:38 pm

MaMo wrote:59'er

+1

or a lil screamin' demon. i've used both with absolutely satisfying results.

DanHeron · Post by **DanHeron** » Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:08 am

Nice guitar, I'm thinking of getting the '65 RI. Is Â£499 for a brand new one a good price?