gibson dark fire les paul???

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
benwalker
.
.
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 3:14 pm
Location: Brighton / UK
Contact:

gibson dark fire les paul???

Post by benwalker »

more robots..

seems like they're going down the "let's put as much on here as possible" route - piezo, humbucker and new p90, self tuning gizmo and what looks like a re-branded echo audiofire 2 with hex input on the back... no clips yet though.

might rock. might just be the same as the gibson/moog guitars from the norlin era.. certainly a nice finish though - red/black burst with black binding.
my signature goes here
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Re: gibson dark fire les paul???

Post by Mike »

benwalker wrote:might rock.
No. See Name on Headstock. See robotic tuners on headstock.

Impossible.
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by Hurb »

That's ugly, even for a les paul.
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

They'll be selling these for real cheaps, yes?

I fucking love the smoked-glass looking scratchplate with the red and matt black pickups. It's iconic.
It's got a breakout box for Roland and Axon compatible MIDI shit- awesome: 100 points for effort more than Fender.

In fact the only thing I don't like is the stupid fucking robotard tuners, and for $$$$ I'd except them to throw in the dots on the fretboad as well.
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

Red + Quilted + ROBOT TUNERS + Gibson = No.
User avatar
Baaan012
.
.
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:02 am
Location: Indianapolis

Post by Baaan012 »

We used to have that color as a carpet when I was like 2 in the "toy room". . . It torments me for life with is ugliness
User avatar
sp3k
.
.
Posts: 1282
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: Portugal

Post by sp3k »

i like the color, but don't like lp's body. what's that neck pickup? a p-90?!
User avatar
benwalker
.
.
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 3:14 pm
Location: Brighton / UK
Contact:

Post by benwalker »

cheap - probably not. To be honest, they'd be better off ditching the tuners (I still hate the glowing tone knob), the interface thing (it's a guitar, not an ipod), putting sperzels on in place and then selling it for maybe $200 more than a stock LP. Like an upgraded BFG?

colour (like the red/black combo), smoked scratchplate and black pickups look sweet, but carbon fibre inlays though???

fender did do something vaguely "hey kids, we're down with your interweb thing" a while back with the four knob VG-Strat - that seemed to be a roland modeller built into the guitar. but four knobs looks wrong and imho 95% of the time you'd end up just playing the pickups rather than the virtual built-in sounds i guess...
my signature goes here
User avatar
DGNR8
.
.
Posts: 4220
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:51 am
Location: DC Area

Post by DGNR8 »

That headstock's already about to break off.
Image
Yell Like Hell
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

We're known for the structural integrity of our headstocks. Let's fuck them up worse, because we truly are the stupidest guitar company in the world
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

Hahaha I didn't even look that much at the website.

LIGHT YOUR FIRE?
The original Robot Guitar took the guitar world by storm
Hahaha
The design and shape of Gibson's iconic Les Paul is timeless, and needs no real introduction or explanation. It is simply the most recognizable and functional guitar design in the world
Hahahahaha

Here is post in the forum that is apparently "BURNING UP" with discussion of this thing (5 topics and a handful of posts \m/)
I hope Gibson never stops keeping up with the new technology. Otherwise, who will set the bar?
Oh god.
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

my 12 year old brother in law is really excited about this. IT TUNES ITSELF GUYS.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
User avatar
Justin J
.
.
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:42 pm
Location: usa

Post by Justin J »

oh cool. a countdown.
r40f
.
.
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:19 am
Location: new york
Contact:

Post by r40f »

aen wrote:my 12 year old brother in law is really excited about this. IT TUNES ITSELF GUYS.
did he also come up with the name of it? i'm embarrassed that i looked at a page that Introduced me to Dark Fire.
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

I like the finish, thats it though.

I got a catalog from Thomann in the post yesterday, had the Les Paul Vixen and the SG with 3 lipstick pu's both for around £350 which seemed like a good deal.
On the site they are more expensive though.

http://img3.musiciansfriend.com/dbase/p ... 390259.jpg

http://en.woodbrass.com/images/woodbrass/SG3WEBCH1.JPG
User avatar
MaMo
.
.
Posts: 972
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: San Francisco,CA
Contact:

Post by MaMo »

Fuck it, I think its cool. Well, except for the autotuning function, that's retarded. But the finish, PAF, P-90 andpiezo? Neato.
scandoslav wrote:i heard these are wank when it comes to metal
RUN AMOK!.
User avatar
jcyphe
.
.
Posts: 16888
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:18 am

Post by jcyphe »

Gibson > Fender
paul_ wrote:When are homeland security gonna get on this "2-piece King Size Snickers" horseshit that showed up a couple years ago? I've started dropping one of them on the floor of my car every time.
User avatar
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by timhulio »

DanHeron wrote:I like the finish, thats it though.

I got a catalog from Thomann in the post yesterday, had the Les Paul Vixen and the SG with 3 lipstick pu's both for around £350 which seemed like a good deal.
On the site they are more expensive though.

http://img3.musiciansfriend.com/dbase/p ... 390259.jpg

http://en.woodbrass.com/images/woodbrass/SG3WEBCH1.JPG
Those are funny blade pickups, like the S1 from the seventies. If they made an sg with a coupla lipsticks I'd pay attention :-)

For trying, Gibson > Fender
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

The robot tuners actually weigh about the same as the normal tuners. They're big but very lightweight.

The robot tuners piss me off. Also, I have no idea why Gibson is offering all these new innovations in such horrid looking finishes. All I can say though is since most of the people who like the vintage look are against these new gadgets they're putting on these guitars, they see no reason to make these "new" guitars vintage looking.

Either way, Gibson still > Fender. At least in my opinion.
User avatar
damienblair17
.
.
Posts: 1069
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by damienblair17 »

Finish = RAWK

Pickups = RAWK

robotics = SUCK

LP Body = MEH

Give me an SG body and maybe even an Epi manufacture and I'll be sold.

and does anybody else feel the new gibson site is ripping off the Apple website?
Doog wrote:The perfect marriage of Teh Kurdtz and Teh Durstz.
RUN AMOK!

KESSEL RUN!