squier affinity teles
Moderated By: mods
Yeah can you wait for tomorrow and decent light?heavium wrote:can you send me a pic of the whole guitar btw ? it's the one you play in that pmt jamz too not ? haha
see what shipping would cost and what you want for it, this isn't a bad idea at all actually
I will cut you deal kim so its not much more with the shipping than the 80 quid I paid without. cause your my numro uno shortscale brethren.
http://fashiontipsband.bandcamp.com/album/fucking-hell
Dance music for anxious people
Dance music for anxious people
I'm quite fond of v-neck jumpers myself, I just don't have any. Same with teles, I suppose.
Kim, I would spring the extra couple bucks for the Standard version over the affinity. Nicer neck for not much more cash.
I had a Squier Standard Telecaster that was brilliant. Seriously, even the hardware was LUSH... not just acceptable, but actually rather nice. It had 6 polished-steel lookin' square block saddles and everything. I guess because it was my first Squier since the mid 90's I was expected a cumbersome, cheap, cut-yourself type guitar, and was very suprised even though I knew Squiers had allegedly gotten nicer.
The neck pickup sucked but I don't like that tele neck pickup anyway (have played american teles where I'm like "what is this wooly lump of shit doing in this guitar?") so I don't know how much of it was me vs. the guitar. The bridge pickup, however, gave exactly the sound I considered "tele-like". Took it home and hooked it up to the Marshall and pedalboards and it was right at home instantly, which is rare when I get a new guitar.
The neck was slim and super comfy too. Overall I considered it a more comfortable tele than the MIM standard Fenders I tried, it just had cheaper electronics in it, thin wire, fischer-price pots with chrome-painted plastic knobs, etc... but all that can be changed on the mega-cheap these days, and I consider that kind of stuff negligible if the basic wooden guitar is nice and you're running it through nice gear. Plus I was only looking for a cheap tele to record a few tracks with at the time... I wish I'd kept it!
Kim, I would spring the extra couple bucks for the Standard version over the affinity. Nicer neck for not much more cash.
I had a Squier Standard Telecaster that was brilliant. Seriously, even the hardware was LUSH... not just acceptable, but actually rather nice. It had 6 polished-steel lookin' square block saddles and everything. I guess because it was my first Squier since the mid 90's I was expected a cumbersome, cheap, cut-yourself type guitar, and was very suprised even though I knew Squiers had allegedly gotten nicer.
The neck pickup sucked but I don't like that tele neck pickup anyway (have played american teles where I'm like "what is this wooly lump of shit doing in this guitar?") so I don't know how much of it was me vs. the guitar. The bridge pickup, however, gave exactly the sound I considered "tele-like". Took it home and hooked it up to the Marshall and pedalboards and it was right at home instantly, which is rare when I get a new guitar.
The neck was slim and super comfy too. Overall I considered it a more comfortable tele than the MIM standard Fenders I tried, it just had cheaper electronics in it, thin wire, fischer-price pots with chrome-painted plastic knobs, etc... but all that can be changed on the mega-cheap these days, and I consider that kind of stuff negligible if the basic wooden guitar is nice and you're running it through nice gear. Plus I was only looking for a cheap tele to record a few tracks with at the time... I wish I'd kept it!
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"