does anyone still play thier jag-stang?
Moderated By: mods
- theshadowofseattle
- THE TAMPA BAY HERO
- Posts: 62654
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:11 am
- Location: Skrampa, FL
I think he posted here with a different name for a year or so? His real name was matt.theshadowofseattle wrote:Anyone remember the original YKYR?
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
a joke?
well, i think that if you were jumping aroudn the room and your j.s. broke, that sounds retarded, i have thrown my j.s. acroos several stage settings as well as during practice, always stays in tune, and it has always been a reliable guitar.
ask a few of the people that have seen mine in real life, it looks like its 30 years old or so, but its a fucking killer.
well, i think that if you were jumping aroudn the room and your j.s. broke, that sounds retarded, i have thrown my j.s. acroos several stage settings as well as during practice, always stays in tune, and it has always been a reliable guitar.
ask a few of the people that have seen mine in real life, it looks like its 30 years old or so, but its a fucking killer.
robert(original) wrote:a joke?
well, i think that if you were jumping aroudn the room and your j.s. broke, that sounds retarded, i have thrown my j.s. acroos several stage settings as well as during practice, always stays in tune, and it has always been a reliable guitar.
ask a few of the people that have seen mine in real life, it looks like its 30 years old or so, but its a fucking killer.
trooth. this thing looks like its been through a fucking battle, but it still plays and sounds awesome!
jcyphe wrote: Mo is the most sensible person in this thread.
icey wrote:and thats for the hatters (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
- Jagermeister
- .
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:22 am
- Location: Riverside CA
I want to see your jagstang.robert(original) wrote:a joke?
well, i think that if you were jumping aroudn the room and your j.s. broke, that sounds retarded, i have thrown my j.s. acroos several stage settings as well as during practice, always stays in tune, and it has always been a reliable guitar.
ask a few of the people that have seen mine in real life, it looks like its 30 years old or so, but its a fucking killer.
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
the overall look of the 96 perloid vs. the re-issue is alot better too.
the 96 materially looks more natural and flowing, kinda like wood grain.
the newer stuff looks.... crushed, or something, more spuratic, and if i remember correctly there was actually like a square inch of material that was just plain white, but im not sure, fran can verify, i sold him the re-issue about 1 year ago or so.
the 96 materially looks more natural and flowing, kinda like wood grain.
the newer stuff looks.... crushed, or something, more spuratic, and if i remember correctly there was actually like a square inch of material that was just plain white, but im not sure, fran can verify, i sold him the re-issue about 1 year ago or so.
Who me?TheDude2112 wrote:do you have a jagstang?silly_rabbit_band wrote:It does look vintage, and very sweet.robert(original) wrote:this pic, is OLD, but you get the point.
i put a cream guard on it since this was taken and its more beat up now, this pic is like.... 4 years old or so.
If I came across a left handed hell even a right handed one and it was cheap, I would buy it.
But no I don't have one.