What do you think of the Starla?
Moderated By: mods
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
What do you think of the Starla?
New PRS for the "retro' market?
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
- Jagermeister
- .
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:22 am
- Location: Riverside CA
It sounds OK, but it looks like ASS.
It looks like the old Gibson L-5S solid bodies that all my friends had in high school because they wanted a Gibson but could only afford the dodgy 70s shit.
My favorite PRS:
In this color. Lightweight, cool P-90 sounds (little weak, but oh well), and plays very well.
I still would never buy a PRS because of all the terrible associations with the late 90s, when EVERY SHIT BAND had a PRS and Mesa Boogie Triple Rectifier.
It looks like the old Gibson L-5S solid bodies that all my friends had in high school because they wanted a Gibson but could only afford the dodgy 70s shit.
My favorite PRS:
In this color. Lightweight, cool P-90 sounds (little weak, but oh well), and plays very well.
I still would never buy a PRS because of all the terrible associations with the late 90s, when EVERY SHIT BAND had a PRS and Mesa Boogie Triple Rectifier.
As far as I can tell, 2 types of people play PRSs.Fran wrote:Jagermeister wrote:PRS can take the legitimacy away from nearly any genre or style.
Do you think that way because it is a relatively new brand?
1. Puddle of Mud, Nickleback, Creed, Sum 41, etc.
2. Old hippies who say "hep" and "cool" every 6th word
Add to this Jimmy Buffet and you've got a cauldron of vapidity.
They're not bad guitars, but it seems only shit musicians play them (or are at least seen with them).
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
im not a fan of.....
the headstock
the inlays.
the body shape.
the pickguard shape.
the color combo.
and finally.
the old fucker playing with that doesn't really tell you anything about the guitar rather than.
"sounds good, its mohogany, single coils get kicked up"
it'd be nice to know what kinda amp/effects he was using and whats on the inside.
for future reference, a simple clean amplifier will showcase the guitar more than a digital proccessor, please let these demo's be a lesson.
everything sounds the same thru digital behringer effects.
the headstock
the inlays.
the body shape.
the pickguard shape.
the color combo.
and finally.
the old fucker playing with that doesn't really tell you anything about the guitar rather than.
"sounds good, its mohogany, single coils get kicked up"
it'd be nice to know what kinda amp/effects he was using and whats on the inside.
for future reference, a simple clean amplifier will showcase the guitar more than a digital proccessor, please let these demo's be a lesson.
everything sounds the same thru digital behringer effects.
- Fran
- The Curmudgeon
- Posts: 22219
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.
I dunno, i like and respect Steve Craddock, Alex Lifeson and Carlos Santana but i dislike all those you mentioned. Thing is, they make some great guitars, and the usual designs are quite easy going. Its not like BC Rich. If association to shit musicians was an issue for me i would never touch a Fender again in my life.DuoSonicBoy wrote:As far as I can tell, 2 types of people play PRSs.Fran wrote:Jagermeister wrote:PRS can take the legitimacy away from nearly any genre or style.
Do you think that way because it is a relatively new brand?
1. Puddle of Mud, Nickleback, Creed, Sum 41, etc.
2. Old hippies who say "hep" and "cool" every 6th word
Add to this Jimmy Buffet and you've got a cauldron of vapidity.
They're not bad guitars, but it seems only shit musicians play them (or are at least seen with them).
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest