HOLY JESUS!!!!!DO WANT

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
light rail coyote
.
.
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:01 am
Location: Rena, Norway
Contact:

HOLY JESUS!!!!!DO WANT

Post by light rail coyote »

Fuzz monkeys are generally fed the most bananas
User avatar
Sloan
Sexy Predator
Posts: 11797
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:02 am
Contact:

Post by Sloan »

FUUUUU
User avatar
Wilbur
.
.
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:25 am
Location: Diggnation, USA

Post by Wilbur »

??? What were they thinking?
User avatar
Ty
.
.
Posts: 2265
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon, U.S.A.
Contact:

Post by Ty »

Wilbur wrote:??? What were they thinking?
THAT 9 SPEAKERS EQUAL PURE AWESOME!
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

hahaha that thing is ridiculous.
User avatar
william
.
.
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:59 pm

Post by william »

how hard would it be to make something like this? im really into the idea of big ridiculous cabs. that one is amazing.
User avatar
Ty
.
.
Posts: 2265
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon, U.S.A.
Contact:

Post by Ty »

I'm sure if you had the speakers, wood working skills, electronic wiring skills, and other parts. Not very.
User avatar
william
.
.
Posts: 1186
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:59 pm

Post by william »

silly_rabbit_band wrote:I'm sure if you had the speakers, wood working skills, electronic wiring skills, and other parts. Not very.
cant be too hard to wire, if you had a bit of direction. the woodwork would be harder for me, but maybe some ikea style ingenuity could help, here.

fender style is maybe contextually more apropo of our purposes. what i mean is, suitably rugged fasteners and well placed, likewise. and sturdy enough materials. no reason that wouldnt/couldnt work as well as tongue and groove or dovetail or whatever styled traditional joints.

is this done? seems too elementary for it to never have been at least attempted.
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 9526
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

Reminds me of:

Image
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

eugh
User avatar
Ty
.
.
Posts: 2265
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon, U.S.A.
Contact:

Post by Ty »

william wrote:
silly_rabbit_band wrote:I'm sure if you had the speakers, wood working skills, electronic wiring skills, and other parts. Not very.
cant be too hard to wire, if you had a bit of direction. the woodwork would be harder for me, but maybe some ikea style ingenuity could help, here.

fender style is maybe contextually more apropo of our purposes. what i mean is, suitably rugged fasteners and well placed, likewise. and sturdy enough materials. no reason that wouldnt/couldnt work as well as tongue and groove or dovetail or whatever styled traditional joints.

is this done? seems too elementary for it to never have been at least attempted.
Or if you have a 4x12 investegate how it's constructed then attempt to imatate it.
brambleperro
.
.
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: California

Post by brambleperro »

silly_rabbit_band wrote:
william wrote:
silly_rabbit_band wrote:I'm sure if you had the speakers, wood working skills, electronic wiring skills, and other parts. Not very.
cant be too hard to wire, if you had a bit of direction. the woodwork would be harder for me, but maybe some ikea style ingenuity could help, here.

fender style is maybe contextually more apropo of our purposes. what i mean is, suitably rugged fasteners and well placed, likewise. and sturdy enough materials. no reason that wouldnt/couldnt work as well as tongue and groove or dovetail or whatever styled traditional joints.

is this done? seems too elementary for it to never have been at least attempted.
Or if you have a 4x12 investegate how it's constructed then attempt to imatate it.
I think the difficult part would be setting up the ohm rating to match up to standard 4/8/16 ohm cabs. 9 speakers doesn't make for easy math.
User avatar
Sublimedo
.
.
Posts: 2656
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:24 am
Location: SO CAL
Contact:

Post by Sublimedo »

It wouldn't be that bad to figure out. Its actually a bit fun.

the more exhaustive part would be the proper power dissipation so you don't blow them speakers up with wrong power rating.
User avatar
Ty
.
.
Posts: 2265
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon, U.S.A.
Contact:

Post by Ty »

MATH IS FUN KIDS!
User avatar
mickie08
.
.
Posts: 6417
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Contact:

Post by mickie08 »

You need to do it in stereo in some cool pattern with the speakers then when you stand in front of it using a stereo effect you get a cool back and forth kind of sound.... It must come with warning labels so as not to endanger small children or animals.
They say great minds think alike....Sometimes we do too...
brambleperro
.
.
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: California

Post by brambleperro »

Sublimedo wrote:It wouldn't be that bad to figure out. Its actually a bit fun.

the more exhaustive part would be the proper power dissipation so you don't blow them speakers up with wrong power rating.
But wouldn't the odd number of resistors force you to use strange wiring to get it to work right? Like 3 sets of 3 series speakers wired in parallel? (R+R+R)||(R+R+R)||(R+R+R) or something similar.

EDIT: That's not strange at all. nvm, then. I don't know what I'm talking about. Each speaker couldn't individually by 4, 8, or 16, that's for sure.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Series/Parallel is a really common wiring scheme in Cabs.
brambleperro
.
.
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: California

Post by brambleperro »

Mike wrote:Series/Parallel is a really common wiring scheme in Cabs.
I know, it's just the specific ohms of each cab that would get me confused, but now I realise that I was over thinking it. If you started with a basic rating (8 for example) for your final rating and worked backwards, it would be simple enough to figure out. I'd just need a pen and paper (and a calculator).

Anyways, I'm making myself look like more of an idiot than usual here. Back to the topic - What would the benefits be of a 9x8? More "tight," "punchy," and with a better high freq response than a 4x10 in the same way that a 4x10 is more so than a 4x12?