Goodbye Supersonic... hello SG

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

You must know it by now having played it and with the replies but that guitar is going to be a lot better than a Super Sonic. If you don't mind saying, how much did you play? Yours is a 1500? That sort of thing can go for an awful lot of money.
Shabba.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Gibson SG's bite the big one for tuning stability and balance.

These ones are much nicer. They finished the design work.
User avatar
dub
.
.
Posts: 1733
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: WGTN, Aotearoa

Post by dub »

The supersonic was fun to play and I enjoyed it's oddball shape. Its just I had a local guy bugging me to sell it to him and so when this deal came up, it was an obvious way to raise capital fast. I wasn't trying to compare the two, as mentioned: There is no comparison aha. If I could have held off a week or two more I just would have bought the guitar outright without needing to flog the SS.
But the guy was threatening to take it the NZ ebay, TradeMe... and there's no way I'd be able to fend off bids.
in fact there's some guy trying to sell a lesser model SG there for twice the price. It's in a bit better shape.. but meh.

I bought the supersonic for 400$NZ, and sold it for the same, that's about 275$US.
The SG2000 was 800$NZ, or 550$US

So ridiculous deal. Yes.
The guy bought it cheaper than that I think which is why he was willing to let it go so cheaply, and he got it from a guy who bought it for 300NZ with an amp included!

It's heavier than any les paul I've played, and EDIT: wait, it's actually heavier than my Sonex, which is like 13 pounds or something retarded. I quite like heavy guitars though, whenever you strap them on its like: "BUSINESS TIME!"
Last edited by dub on Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

SG2000 for 800$NZ/550$US/£350 - that's a contendor for deal of the year.
Shabba.
dezb1
The Oppressor
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:59 am
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Post by dezb1 »

I had a Yamaha SG 1300t years ago, Floyd Rose style trem, locking nut, coil tap.

Like this one but with a black trem

Image


I wish i still had it, it was a beast of a guitar

[edit] don't ever sell it, learn from my mistake
Last edited by dezb1 on Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XY
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

James wrote:SG2000 for 800$NZ/550$US/£350 - that's a contendor for deal of the year.
Agreed.
benecol

Post by benecol »

That is an amazing guitar - great deal. I'm jealous.
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

Fran wrote:
James wrote:SG2000 for 800$NZ/550$US/£350 - that's a contendor for deal of the year.
Agreed.
:shock: there's one from the same period on edinburgh gumtree that i was looking at today priced at £800.

damn.

Image
Image
pinkandblue
.
.
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Dublin

Post by pinkandblue »

Mike wrote:Gibson SG's bite the big one for tuning stability and balance.

These ones are much nicer. They finished the design work.
I disagree, like all Gibsons they stay in tune perfectly. Also, the balance comes down to personal preference. I owned a Gibson SG Special that I had to sell but I really loved that guitar...