Jagstang w/ built in sustainer

Painting? Routing? Set-up tips? Or just straight-up making a guitar from scratch? Post here, and post pics!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Joey
.
.
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Jagstang w/ built in sustainer

Post by Joey »

I've had this project for a while just hadn't gotten around to finishing the paint. I was wanting to paint the body black. But now I'm leaning towards Dakota Red. I made a one peice pickguard, that replaces the control plate cause I got 3 control pots. I'm thinking about adding a battery box to the rear of the guitar, just to make battery change out easier. Putting the jack on the bottom of the guitar like a Les Paul. And installing the orginal control plate. I dunno what to do?

Black handmade pickguard
Bridge pickup JB
Fernandes Neck Pickup/Sustainer
3 way Toggle Switch Bridge/Both/Neck
Tune-o-matic Bridge
Locked Tail
Volume Pot / Tone Pot / Sustain Intensity
Switch on/off Sustainer / Switch Sustain Pitch
Orginal Jagstang Neck w/ Matching Pre-CBS Headstock
Replacement Tuners
Contour Added, no belly contour.... parnoid I might go thru the stock switch cavity


Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Joey
.
.
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Joey »

My other Jagstang

Electronics
Bridge Pickup EMG - 81
Neck Pickup EMG - 85
Toggle Switch - Bridge/Both/Neck
25K Volume Pot (stock cause of active pickups)
25K Push/Pull Pot (push is wired .1mf cap (stock for active pickups)/pull is wired tone bypass (wide open))
2 - 9 Volt battery, pushing the pickups to 18 volts

Body & Neck
Replacement Tuners & Shimmed neck
Tune-o-matic Bridge & Lock Tail
Custom Pickguard, forgot who made it
Shielded guard and cavity
Chrome Knobs

I slanted the bass side of the TOM bridge back towards the tail (extend the scale) for better intonation on my 52's.

Image

Image
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

Those are both pretty sweet. Im tinkering with a sustainer project too.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Memories
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

+1 for Dakota Red.
Its great to see some fellow enthusiasm for the JS and to see modified models. I would be very interested to see and hear that when its finished Joey.
m0n0mania
.
.
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:40 pm

Post by m0n0mania »

I've got a sustainer on a jagmaster, with the battery box sunk in the back. The annoying thing for me though is not being able to get to the trimmer pots without removing the pickguard, tempted to just put an extra hole in the back & be done with it!
User avatar
Joey
.
.
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Joey »

hahaha... yeh your right it's a pain to adjust the pots on the circuit board, don't mention that again, I just wanna finish the dam thing.

Other then that are you happy with the sustainer?
User avatar
DICHOTOMY
BLOWN MINDS
Posts: 4640
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:53 pm

Post by DICHOTOMY »

loving the color on the second one.

i really need to branch out of my regular red or white comfort zone.
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

gerryhernandez wrote:loving the color on the second one.

i really need to branch out of my regular red or white comfort zone.
I hear you on that.

My guitars are:

Sunburst
Brown
Red burst
White
Desert.

I didn't intentionally go for that side of the colour spectrum but it just keeps on happenin'.
prospect
.
.
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:10 pm
Location: brooklyn and miami
Contact:

Post by prospect »

I vote for returning to your initial idea; black!

I'm excited to see the finished product either way.
I like your ideas.
User avatar
ploppy
.
.
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Wales,UK

Post by ploppy »

Image
That looks really cool,
How does the EMG compare to the original humbucker?
User avatar
Joey
.
.
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Joey »

prospect wrote:I vote for returning to your initial idea; black!

I'm excited to see the finished product either way.
I like your ideas.
I'm just nervous about the black pickups... black guard... black knobs... ehhh black body? Just might be too much black. I really wanted to do a bloody red/black color. And with nitrocellulose lacquer your color spectrum is really limited. Unless you buy some pigment and mix your own colors. I've got some time before I get around to this project. I'm working on a few other Mustang/Jazzmaster body build at the moment.
How does the EMG compare to the original humbucker?
Alot more power! I tried several high out put passive pickups but was never happy with them. So active pickups were the next step. I like the pickups with my amp lead channel. I've got the 81 & 85... 81 great for metal riffs, sterile/weak for clean stuff. The 85 is good for clean stuff, not as good for metal riffs, but I still use it alot.

I wouldn't of put in EMG's if I owned just one guitar. If I wanna rock out, I grab this guitar. If I wanna chill, I grab different guitar. I like to have guitars that do one thing really great, rather then "ok all around". You can check out these pickups at Guitar Center, EMG are stock in alot of "heavy metal" guitars now a days.
User avatar
ploppy
.
.
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Wales,UK

Post by ploppy »

What's the main differences between active and passive pickups then?
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

Heard of google?
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED
User avatar
paul_
.
.
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by paul_ »

Good point, Google may very well lead him to a guitar discussion website where he can learn useful information on the matter.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang? :x
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
User avatar
ploppy
.
.
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Wales,UK

Post by ploppy »

Noirie. wrote:Heard of google?
Yes thanks!Image
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

passive means it's not powered. active means it's powered. active pickups have a pre-amp built in that boost the output level.
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
User avatar
ploppy
.
.
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Wales,UK

Post by ploppy »

mage wrote:passive means it's not powered. active means it's powered. active pickups have a pre-amp built in that boost the output level.
Cheers Mage.
User avatar
Joey
.
.
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Post by Joey »

Yeh, active pickups require a power source. Most people use one 9 volt battery with their EMG's. I put in 2 - 9 volt battery to push the pickups. They are rated for 27 volts... but there isn't much difference in tone 18 volts vs 27 volts.
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

Joey wrote:Yeh, active pickups require a power source. Most people use one 9 volt battery with their EMG's. I put in 2 - 9 volt battery to push the pickups. They are rated for 27 volts... but there isn't much difference in tone 18 volts vs 27 volts.
I still want a guitar with a petrol generator to power crazy hot pickups.
Image