I gots moogerfooger
Moderated By: mods
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
It (ring mod)effected my bypassed tone. that is redick. Pedals should not do that period. let alone a pedal that is so costly. yes the sounds they make are awesome. but it is unforgivable to mess with bypassed tone imo.
http://fashiontipsband.bandcamp.com/album/fucking-hell
Dance music for anxious people
Dance music for anxious people
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
well, pedals work the way they work and its up to you to use them or not. moogs are not like a drive pedal where wet and dry must be two seperate things. for moogs sound IS supposed to go through the circuit all the time. that said i dont know to what extent your signal was affected and if there was any defect but with all moogs i've seen the signal isnt affected drastically to the point of being unusable.Hurb wrote:It (ring mod)effected my bypassed tone. that is redick. Pedals should not do that period. let alone a pedal that is so costly. yes the sounds they make are awesome. but it is unforgivable to mess with bypassed tone imo.
It's cool to have a different opinion on pedals, but don't try and school me on pedals matey. I will keep it simple. when pedal is off I want the sound to be as close to as if I had no pedals in-between me and my amp. when on it can do what the fuck it wants. the moogs change the bypassed sound. not cool.riotshield wrote:well, pedals work the way they work and its up to you to use them or not. moogs are not like a drive pedal where wet and dry must be two seperate things. for moogs sound IS supposed to go through the circuit all the time. that said i dont know to what extent your signal was affected and if there was any defect but with all moogs i've seen the signal isnt affected drastically to the point of being unusable.Hurb wrote:It (ring mod)effected my bypassed tone. that is redick. Pedals should not do that period. let alone a pedal that is so costly. yes the sounds they make are awesome. but it is unforgivable to mess with bypassed tone imo.
http://fashiontipsband.bandcamp.com/album/fucking-hell
Dance music for anxious people
Dance music for anxious people
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
So why does it have a footswitch?riotshield wrote:for moogs sound IS supposed to go through the circuit all the time.Hurb wrote:It (ring mod)effected my bypassed tone. that is redick. Pedals should not do that period. let alone a pedal that is so costly. yes the sounds they make are awesome. but it is unforgivable to mess with bypassed tone imo.
That's pretty ridiculous reasoning- no-one wants one effect plaguing their sound ALL THE TIME. Just sounds like a shit bypass.
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
Seriously. This cannot be defended.Doog wrote:So why does it have a footswitch?riotshield wrote:for moogs sound IS supposed to go through the circuit all the time.Hurb wrote:It (ring mod)effected my bypassed tone. that is redick. Pedals should not do that period. let alone a pedal that is so costly. yes the sounds they make are awesome. but it is unforgivable to mess with bypassed tone imo.
That's pretty ridiculous reasoning- no-one wants one effect plaguing their sound ALL THE TIME. Just sounds like a shit bypass.
It is SIMPLE circuit design to eliminate this issue and they just don't care enough to do it. At that price, that is a straight insult.
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
i am not trying to defend and this is my last post on this as it doesnt matter that much
if the moogs were true bypass it wouldnt be (for me at least) a benefit as they actually make the signal better even when the effect is not engaged. that is obviously highly debatable but i think that they do that for a reason.
if the moogs were true bypass it wouldnt be (for me at least) a benefit as they actually make the signal better even when the effect is not engaged. that is obviously highly debatable but i think that they do that for a reason.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
They do not "do it for a reason", and the "makes your signal better" by degrading it and removing treble content goes against everything I believe as a builder.
When the effect is off you don't monkey with the signal - you buffer it WELL or you true bypass. These are the options. Any reduction in information is unacceptable.
When the effect is off you don't monkey with the signal - you buffer it WELL or you true bypass. These are the options. Any reduction in information is unacceptable.
- riotshield
- .
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 1:51 pm
- Location: Athens
- Mityushikha
- .
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:05 pm
- Location: Plymouth, UK
I use it with my synths rather than with my guitar...sounds cool with a drum machine too...aen wrote:Actually they were some of the last thigns he worked on, sound great, and have perfectly fine bypass. Expensive, yes. They're really quite a crossover machine, work best together or wiht a synth setup. Imagine trying to find synth modules as versatile for the same price. Not going to happen.Mike wrote:They're pretty much a blight on Moog's legacy. Overpriced, don't sound that good. They look stupid. I think they're incredibly shit.
I'll see you in hell with the rest of the trash
C'mon guys, you can't spend as much as a moogerfooger costs and then go "wow, this thing has a shit bypass."
You'll feel a bit stupid.
You'll feel a bit stupid.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"