What should I do with my Jaguar rhythm circuit?

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

What should I do with my Jaguar rhythm circuit?

Post by Thom »

So, I categorically never use the rhythm circuit on my Jag, and I've always thought that it was a bit of a waste of space/opportunity to put something I would find useful there.
Have considered a built in effect of some sort, maybe a fernandez sustainer.
Anyway, what would you do if you were to replace the rhythm circuit with something else?
benecol

Post by benecol »

Pretty sure you have to carry out all sorts of fuckery under the scratchplate to fit a sustainer. I'd bung in either a fuzz or a boost; one of my favourite things about my Dano's has always been that you get quite a boost in the middle pickup position. You know, for those days when you don't want to move your foot...

I vote Rangemaster.
User avatar
Bacchus
Whatever's handiest
Posts: 23590
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:10 am
Location: wandering

Post by Bacchus »

benecol wrote:Pretty sure you have to carry out all sorts of fuckery under the scratchplate to fit a sustainer.
As far as I know it involves installing their neck humbucker.
Image
benecol

Post by benecol »

Pretty sure there's a load of gubbins in between under the scratchplate.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

BacchusPaul wrote:
benecol wrote:Pretty sure you have to carry out all sorts of fuckery under the scratchplate to fit a sustainer.
As far as I know it involves installing their neck humbucker.
Ah ok! Shows how much research I did into this.

I was thinking maybe fuzz, as I don't have one on my board at the moment (or in general)...
User avatar
laterallateral
Traynor or Death
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am
Location: Montery Howl

Post by laterallateral »

I would pop a tremolo in there with a simple rate/depth/on/off.
it's the kind of effect that people typically do a lot of on-offing with, so putting it right there on the guitar would be convenient.
Last edited by laterallateral on Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:05 pm; edited 115,726 times in total
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

laterallateral wrote:I would pop a tremolo in there with a simple rate/depth/on/off.
it's the kind of effect that people typically do a lot of on-offing with, so putting it right there on the guitar would be convenient.
Nice...I like this suggestion...
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

if it's possible, fuzz AND hard clip tremolo.

one knob is mix fuzz/trem.
other knob is trem rate.

i have no idea if you could screw around with two of those modboard things from GFS or whatever to do that, or if they would even fit in the cavity but it would be awesome if you could.
User avatar
the isaac eaton
.
.
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:48 am
Location: Kennewick, WA free country USA
Contact:

Post by the isaac eaton »

theremin plate that controls a crazy moog synth sequencer that is also in your guitar, also you will need a FM radio tuner, a remote control for a microwave oven, an aquarium, laser light projector, flame thrower, Kaoss pad used as a midi controller to control how high your drummer's drum riser is, thrown an analog delay and a barrack obama sound board in there and you are good to go.

Get to work on that.
Mike wrote:Welcome to like 2005, you bleeding idiot.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

the isaac eaton wrote:theremin plate that controls a crazy moog synth sequencer that is also in your guitar, also you will need a FM radio tuner, a remote control for a microwave oven, an aquarium, laser light projector, flame thrower, Kaoss pad used as a midi controller to control how high your drummer's drum riser is, thrown an analog delay and a barrack obama sound board in there and you are good to go.

Get to work on that.
Damn now why didn't I think of that! :lol:
User avatar
laterallateral
Traynor or Death
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am
Location: Montery Howl

Post by laterallateral »

A theremin would be FREAKING AWESOME, though.
wire up the truss rod in your neck to act as the pitch control and the plate itself as the volume.
Last edited by laterallateral on Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by laterallateral on Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:05 pm; edited 115,726 times in total
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Theres aplenty of MicroFX out there, i've considered this many times. What would be more usefull Thom? Onboard boost, comp, fuzz, tem, delay..?
Personally, considering restrictions based on design size, i would avoid stuff too complicated. I would go for something more practical like an onboard clean boost switch.
User avatar
the isaac eaton
.
.
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:48 am
Location: Kennewick, WA free country USA
Contact:

Post by the isaac eaton »

honestly it was my first thought
Mike wrote:Welcome to like 2005, you bleeding idiot.
User avatar
Reece
.
.
Posts: 10359
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Reece »

actually i think an onboard delay would be awesome.

much easier for screwing around the controls so it goes all glitchy, or the ability to have a "self oscillate" switch on the guitar.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

Fran wrote:Theres aplenty of MicroFX out there, i've considered this many times. What would be more usefull Thom? Onboard boost, comp, fuzz, tem, delay..?
Personally, considering restrictions based on design size, i would avoid stuff too complicated. I would go for something more practical like an onboard clean boost switch.
Absolutely Fran, am thinking simple. Boost is the most obvious choice, but I have 2 boosts on my board, so think that that would be a bit of a waste.
Things currently missing from my board that I may use most are trem and fuzz.
User avatar
Thom
lamp
Posts: 6999
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Exeter, UK

Post by Thom »

Reece wrote:actually i think an onboard delay would be awesome.

much easier for screwing around the controls so it goes all glitchy, or the ability to have a "self oscillate" switch on the guitar.
Also good points!
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Some modestly priced boosts and distortions HERE.

Judging by Owens guitar onboard tremolo could sond good. Not sure what circuit was used there though.

Hmm... Tremololz!
User avatar
Noirie.
YOUTH
Posts: 5364
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:51 pm

Post by Noirie. »

Fran wrote:Judging by Owens guitar onboard tremolo could sond good. Not sure what circuit was used there though.
I'm 100% certain its a EA Tremolo.
theshadowofseattle wrote:less being WOKE
more being STOKED
User avatar
robert(original)
.
.
Posts: 7174
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: somewhere in the midwest

Post by robert(original) »

put some toggles on there and rock a ROT YR BRAIN!
the tremolo idea is pretty good tho...
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

KILL

SWITCH