suede wrote:manga...Yarko wrote:could someone enlighten me about why fender japan is making BECK guitars that weren't in the show? all I remember seeing was a vintage tele and a les paul. no mustang.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f313/4f313d3cf1c04e50320b0fb1ad8e735f647460fb" alt="Image"
Moderated By: mods
We're talking about someone that spent $2500 on a Mustang. $2500. On a Mustang. I doubt someone would spend that much money on a guitar they don't have some sort of intention on using.stewart wrote: or maybe they want something that they prefer aesthetically, even if it means they don't use the full functionality of it.
for example, i rarely if ever use neck pickups, but still reserve the right to purchase a guitar with one.
That's a really good point. My Mullet-stang has a 1969 Mustang neck and you would think the neck on my 1969 Comp-stang RI (MG69) would be similiar profile but they aren't . The nut on the Comp-stang is much smaller and the neck feels thicker while the Mullet-stang's neck feels almost like a Jaguar neck. I know expecting a vintage neck to match a RI neck might be asking a lot, but I am surprised considering the reissue is from the same year.SKC Willie wrote:what you have to keep in mind w/ the vintage comp stangs as well, is that while those two are very, very similar, there was a lot of change from one comp stang to another.
I went to Rodvonbon's place and got to play all of his and it's amazing how every single one was different. from the size of the neck to the location of the stripe. I ended up getting one of the guitars and it has a pretty chunky neck, on the other hand, the neck on another friends and several of Eric's guitars are pretty skinny.
I'm not sure the vintage ones had any specs, or I should say the tolerances were all over the place. I've owned and still own quite a few vintage Mustangs and they all vary from one to another.stewart wrote:The specs on the 69RIs are all over the place, they're nothing like vintage compstangs.