What overdrive pedal?
Moderated By: mods
well commonly the practice is that overdrive uses soft clipping and distortion uses hard clipping. not always the case, mind, but often enough.Pens wrote:Really though, any dirt pedal can be an OD if you just back off the gain and crank the volume on them. All OD pedals are basically gain-limited regular dirt boxes.
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
No? The Tubescreamer uses normal diodes for it's clipping just like every other distortion out there. The only different is the GAIN which causes distortions to clip more severely if you turn them up. But they are the same.mage wrote:well commonly the practice is that overdrive uses soft clipping and distortion uses hard clipping. not always the case, mind, but often enough.Pens wrote:Really though, any dirt pedal can be an OD if you just back off the gain and crank the volume on them. All OD pedals are basically gain-limited regular dirt boxes.
I've made a fuck ton of dirt circuits dude. The only diff with fuzz/distortion/OD is the amount of gain stages you put in them.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
alright, that's cool, I didn't say I necessarily disagree with you. in a way you could say as you increase the gain in a distortion circuit more and more it shapes the waveform until the peaks are almost completely flattened off. this is called hard clipping. over drive doesn't have enough gain to do that, it merely mashes down the peaks a bit. this is called soft clipping.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/050ce/050ce320d7f889d7d72d1a8ef7f757fd03b0f05c" alt="Image"
I'm pretty sure there are some circuits that work better for one kind of clipping rather than the other. you might be able to gain the hell out of a soft clipping circuit until it hard clips but there are a lot of circuits that just don't do soft clipping (aka overdrive) very well. fuzz being the most blatant example.
this site talks about it a bit: http://www.gmarts.org/index.php?go=217
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/050ce/050ce320d7f889d7d72d1a8ef7f757fd03b0f05c" alt="Image"
I'm pretty sure there are some circuits that work better for one kind of clipping rather than the other. you might be able to gain the hell out of a soft clipping circuit until it hard clips but there are a lot of circuits that just don't do soft clipping (aka overdrive) very well. fuzz being the most blatant example.
this site talks about it a bit: http://www.gmarts.org/index.php?go=217
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
You get harder clipping by using the same diodes and pushing the wave bigger through them. They get chopped off more until they are square waves.
In other words, you increase the gain to make harder clipping.
In other words, exactly what I said.
EDIT: To clarify further, yeah a fuzz might have multiple clipping stages but if you don't put through a high gain signal, the wave won't hit the clipping threshold and will clip the same way as a Tubescreamer does. However, distortion circuits typically have the same amount of clipping built into them. The Rat and DS-1 have the same number of clipping stages (one) as the TS808, and the diodes are the same type. There is no difference except the amount of gain.
In other words, you increase the gain to make harder clipping.
In other words, exactly what I said.
EDIT: To clarify further, yeah a fuzz might have multiple clipping stages but if you don't put through a high gain signal, the wave won't hit the clipping threshold and will clip the same way as a Tubescreamer does. However, distortion circuits typically have the same amount of clipping built into them. The Rat and DS-1 have the same number of clipping stages (one) as the TS808, and the diodes are the same type. There is no difference except the amount of gain.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
-
- .
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
- Location: London, England
Thanks for all the advice. In the end I ordered a Danelectro Transparent Overdrive after reading reviews and hearing soundclips etc. I figured for the price and with all the recommendations I couldn't go wrong. In fact, as all the Cool Cat range pedals are so reasonably priced, I ordered the Drive and Fuzz pedals too!
-
- .
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
- Location: London, England
Thanks for all the advice. In the end I ordered a Danelectro Transparent Overdrive after reading reviews and hearing soundclips etc. I figured for the price and with all the recommendations I couldn't go wrong. In fact, as all the Cool Cat range pedals are so reasonably priced, I ordered the Drive and Fuzz pedals too!
Except, of course, that they're a provenly hateful, homophobic company whose CEO is a supporter of Prop 8. You're new to the boards, so couldn't be expected to have known this, but try to only buy Dano product second hand if you can possibly help it.johnnyseven wrote:I figured for the price and with all the recommendations I couldn't go wrong.
That said, I have a (pre-hate) Dano TOD and it's great. And welcome aboard SS Shortscale.
-
- .
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
- Location: London, England
Stewart said 'dude' in the diary thread, and the whole 'Bill and Ted'-ness of it has given me ammunition to jibe him about it since.
Oh, you mean this Dano lark.
Oh, you mean this Dano lark.
-
- .
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:42 pm
- Location: London, England
Thanks for that. I've not heard of the Zoom pedal but i've had a Turbo Rat before and would catagorise it as more of a heavy distortion pedal than a mild overdrive and I found the one I had to be too muddy sounding for my taste. I have a modified Rat2 which I love and I much preferred to the Turbo Rat but again I would count this as a distortion pedal as opposed to an overdrive.