sinister shortscale Rondo strat

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

sinister shortscale Rondo strat

Post by cur »

There is a left hand shortscale strat on Rondomusic and it has the older style fenderish headstock. Not sure if it is th only one they have. Might make someone a nice project. I know it is hard out there for a lefty.


Lank

If this does not belong in this forum section please move to where it does belong.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

I've contemplated buying one of those for years now. $80 almost makes it worth it.

Considering.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

I was thinking of you when I posted it. Might be a nice treat since you latest neck problems.

I love mine, I did some upgrades to it. I have two Rondo guitars now, the little SX and a Douglas, They each had some minor issues but I sort of figured they would not be perfect for the price. Both guitars needed fret levels but this was really no big deal since they have big ol' frets. I think this is why they come with the big frets as well ; }
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

How does the neck feel in comparison to a Fender 24" neck?
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
endsjustifymeans
Grown Up Punk
Posts: 19442
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
Location: Ball So Hard University

Post by endsjustifymeans »

Pens wrote:How does the neck feel in comparison to a Fender 24" neck?
curious about that as well, their 24" tele has always called to me.
dots wrote:society is crumbling because of asshoels like ends
brainfur wrote:I'm having difficulty reconciling my desire to smash the state & kill all white people with my desire for a new telecaster
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Well, the thing is, I need to drop some cash on fixing up that SuperSonic at this point. I really want to start using that guitar. $80 isn't much but I'd have to do work to that SX before I could use it, so I'd be dropping more money in it, and I'd really just rather not have another project at this point.

Now, if the neck is decent I would be very very tempted.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

The SX neck (fender looking headstock) is like a c neck more or half round, The fender 2009 duo sonic is very thin profile. That being said, the SX neck is not as broad across as the duo sonic neck. The nut on the SX is 1 1/2 inch. To be noted, the douglas 24" scale necks they have are the wider nut. The SX neck is very comfy in my hands, but the stings are closer together.

The douglas spad guitar I have is a lot more similar to my duo sonic in neck profile.

In a day or so I can post picks if you guys are interested.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Hmmm. It sounds like the SX is closer to the vintage Jag neck then, which I like.

I don't see a shortscale Douglas lefty though, so doesn't matter. However, they do have a few different shortscale strats there. I kinda like this one though I don't want all the extra crap:

http://www.rondomusic.com/product2235.html

They also have a single humbuck shortscale however I hate maple fretboards.

http://www.rondomusic.com/product2201.html

Trying to talk myself out of this.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
clarkbar
.
.
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Connellsville, PA

Post by clarkbar »

so the width of the neck is similar to a mustang? but a C shape?
yes, thats clark...like the candybar...
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Anyway, I didn't realize they had the better looking headstocks left. Then I saw one in their email adds and thought someone might b interested. When I got mine I figured for $80 bucks if it is shit i can bring it out back and shoot it with guns. But Rondo has a good return policy so you don't have to do that unless you want to.
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Never spent any time on a mustang so I could not tell you. But the nut is narrow and I think that some mustangs had A necks and I think that was 1.5 inch nut, but I am no expert.
ItsaBear
.
.
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:40 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by ItsaBear »

from the 10 minutes i spent on a 70s mustang at my local GC i would say the width is indeed similar on the sx shortscales

but you have to take that with only 10 minutes of experience so dont go all aggro if im wrong :D
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Man I almost want to buy both the first one and the single humbucker version, and just put the rosewood neck on the humbucker guitar. That would still only be $160.

Fuck.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Hey quick question about those, what kind of routing is under the pickguard with regards to pickups?
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
endsjustifymeans
Grown Up Punk
Posts: 19442
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
Location: Ball So Hard University

Post by endsjustifymeans »

you bastards... now you got me looking at these...

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu...

If they are like the full sized sx strats then they are routed per pup, not swammin pool.
dots wrote:society is crumbling because of asshoels like ends
brainfur wrote:I'm having difficulty reconciling my desire to smash the state & kill all white people with my desire for a new telecaster
ItsaBear
.
.
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:40 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by ItsaBear »

im not sure about the single coil one but on the single humbucker mine was routed for just the humbucker and it stops after that so adding pickups would require extra routing. but the humbucker area is like a kiddy pool if you will so you could put pretty much any pickup there with some slant

ill try and snap a picture of the route for the single hum one tonight
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Image
Image

I will try and do a trace of neck for you.

Itsabear what one do you have? The shortscale?
User avatar
Grant
.
.
Posts: 1148
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:46 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Grant »

cur wrote:The nut on the SX is 1 1/2 inch.
THIS. This is why I want one. This one: http://www.rondomusic.com/eg134pbu.html. I've got some other plans for the neck as well.
User avatar
Pens
less dickface
Posts: 13982
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:51 pm
Location: South St. Louis

Post by Pens »

Okay, so the routing would make putting in a bridge humbucker on the single coil ones not feasible without routing. Good to know.
euan wrote: I'm running in monoscope right now. I can't read multiple dimensions of meta right now
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Image

pipe-cleaner trace of neck profile at 12th and 1st fret. E to E spacing at the nut is 1.5" and is to scale in the pic.