Really? How come?gaybear wrote:looks purdy, but the neck looks like a pain in the ass to play
What do you think of the new(2009) Les Paul Junior?
Moderated By: mods
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
- damienblair17
- .
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:31 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Well, there's all the evidence I ever needed.Mike wrote:I love him. He's basically me without any self awareness and with better playing ability.Reece wrote:i can't help but kinda like phil x.
he clearly got the love, although in person he'd be insufferable.
I think his demos are fantastic, he loves playing guitar. Hooray for joy.
WHAA? You're back?pumpkin wrote:Well, there's all the evidence I ever needed.Mike wrote:I love him. He's basically me without any self awareness and with better playing ability.Reece wrote:i can't help but kinda like phil x.
he clearly got the love, although in person he'd be insufferable.
I think his demos are fantastic, he loves playing guitar. Hooray for joy.
NJjoanjettfan wrote: Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks to save the originals from wear.
Congrats on the new Junior!
Gibson is charging way too much for them new. List is something like $150 more than the faded SG, despite having fewer body contours, half as many pickups/pots/no switch, cheaper tuners, etc. Compared the SG at $700, they should be charging $600-650 tops. A used model at $500 or so would be a good deal.
Gibson is charging way too much for them new. List is something like $150 more than the faded SG, despite having fewer body contours, half as many pickups/pots/no switch, cheaper tuners, etc. Compared the SG at $700, they should be charging $600-650 tops. A used model at $500 or so would be a good deal.
- westtexasred
- Shortscale Cultural Minister
- Posts: 16977
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:10 pm
- Location: Minneapolis
Thanks man. Yeah,I agree that they are too expensive but you can find good deals on used one's. I'm really happy with the one I got. I just love that Gibson P-90Dice wrote:Congrats on the new Junior!
Gibson is charging way too much for them new. List is something like $150 more than the faded SG, despite having fewer body contours, half as many pickups/pots/no switch, cheaper tuners, etc. Compared the SG at $700, they should be charging $600-650 tops. A used model at $500 or so would be a good deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d84b9/d84b94d4aa65e2d6e18d5e0b8d4f7f34ddc739ab" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d5c8/7d5c853c6417c32e63ad52e5508b5d256ea7eff6" alt="Image"
I used to have a 2003 Melody Maker which is similar but I like the wraparound bridge on the Junior better. Also I like the finish on the Junior better
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a660/6a6606e6616d0a7e2ba6df31a65e37297d7bbabb" alt="Image"